Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester Model 1892 .25-20/.32-20?
Avatar
Donovan Cooper
New Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
June 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 5, 2026 - 8:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I recently purchased an 1892 Winchester SN 5759XX with the barrel caliber marked .25-20.

 When going through it to clean it up I have determined it has a .32-20 Chamber and barrel.

 It does not appear to have been worked over and in fair condition. The rifling and interior of the barrel

 is excellent. I called Cody and checked to see what a letter would say about the caliber and their records

do not go back that far. Does anyone out there ever found a caliber mismarked firearm shipped from the factory?

 Has anybody ever seen such a mistake made by Winchester?

 I would appreciate any thoughts on this subject.

 Thanks 

 Don Cooper #65709

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 7104
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 5, 2026 - 8:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Don-

Take a look at the bottom of the barrel, if unsure take and post a few good pics of the stampings.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13972
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
March 5, 2026 - 9:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The odds of it being a factory mismarked caliber are extremely miniscule.  Based on your description of the exterior condition of the rifle versus the bore and rifling, I highly suspect that the barrel was rebored & rechambered for the 32-20 cartridge.  It is very unlikely that that a “fair” condition Model 1892 has an “excellent” condition bore & rifling.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
John D.
Star ID
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 203
Member Since:
March 3, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 6, 2026 - 6:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
The odds of it being a factory mismarked caliber are extremely miniscule.  Based on your description of the exterior condition of the rifle versus the bore and rifling, I highly suspect that the barrel was rebored & rechambered for the 32-20 cartridge.  It is very unlikely that that a “fair” condition Model 1892 has an “excellent” condition bore & rifling.
Bert
  

Especially in that caliber.  A good number of the 25-20’s I’ve looked at have roached bores, so re-boring and re-chambering would not be a surprise.

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2627
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 6, 2026 - 6:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Donovan Cooper said
I recently purchased an 1892 Winchester SN 5759XX with the barrel caliber marked .25-20.
 When going through it to clean it up I have determined it has a .32-20 Chamber and barrel.
 It does not appear to have been worked over and in fair condition. The rifling and interior of the barrel
 is excellent. I called Cody and checked to see what a letter would say about the caliber and their records
do not go back that far. Does anyone out there ever found a caliber mismarked firearm shipped from the factory?
 Has anybody ever seen such a mistake made by Winchester?
 I would appreciate any thoughts on this subject.
 Thanks 
 Don Cooper #65709
  

Hello Don,

If you will post some additional images of the gun and the stamped writing on the barrel I will be happy to take a look and advise.  I have looked at more than 22,000 individual rifles while working on my research survey of the 1892’s And have a pretty good idea of what should be correct for any SN range.  [email protected]

Michael 

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Bert H.
Guest(s) 272
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 7104
Chuck: 6461
steve004: 5517
1873man: 4846
deerhunter: 2848
twobit: 2627
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2350
Maverick: 2156
Newest Members:
Jeffhuey1n
rttexas
Shark
Tim I
triggeron
Grousehunter
BrickTamland
GaryS
Krazykarsen270
MacM
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15548
Posts: 141061

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10470
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation