Log In
July 8, 2012
Offline
Bert,
Do you have a survey going for the Model 94 N&W Railway carbines?
Thanks,
Al
April 15, 2005
Online
Al,
I do not have a separate survey for them, but they are included in my all-encompassing survey. Thus far I have (3) of them identified. What is the S/N on the one you have pictured?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
July 8, 2012
Offline
937686
November 19, 2006
Offline
Al –
Very cool. I had never heard of these.
April 15, 2005
Online
tionesta1 said
937686
That is number 3 of 3 in my survey;
937282, 937621, and 937686. I have a note in my survey that 937282 was 1 of 10 in the same crate, and I suspect that all three I have documented were in the same crate.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
July 8, 2012
Offline
Bert,
I have 937282 with the crate.
I attached a .pdf. Not sure if it worked.
Al
April 15, 2005
Online
tionesta1 said
Bert,I have 937282 with the crate.
I attached a .pdf. Not sure if it worked.
Al
It worked.
There is a problem with that hang tag for S/N 937282… per the Winchester PR records, serial number “937282” was applied (stamped) on the receiver frame on January 30th, 1922… almost 7 full years after the date on that tag! Because I am 100% certain that the PR records are accurate, it leads me to believe that the tag is highly questionable.
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
July 8, 2012
Offline
Bert,
The tag has the same serial number (gun number) on it as the carbine, and it appears that the gun number and date issued were written by the same person. Could it be that the date issued 3/15 means March 15th?
Thanks,
Al
April 15, 2005
Online
tionesta1 said
Bert,The tag has the same serial number (gun number) on it as the carbine, and it appears that the gun number and date issued were written by the same person. Could it be that the date issued 3/15 means March 15th?
Thanks,
Al
That is a plausible explanation, though an odd way to record a date.
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
1 Guest(s)
