Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
2 model 55s and a model 64 short barrel
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 36
Member Since:
July 22, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 22, 2025 - 7:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Several more victims for the Surveys

Model 55 #1085105 30 WCF solid frame—marbles tang sight with a fold down barrel sight—Nickel Steel bbl

Model 55 #1093482 30 WCF solid frame—Nickel steel bbl

Model 64 #1095067 standard 20 inch bbl Lyman 56 reciever sight 

as an additional outlier I also have a standard 64 rifle 24 inch bbl that’s evidently a “transition model” #1391416   30 WCF with no roll marks on the tang but has the earlier “checkered” hammer (not ribbed) —has the early narrow forearm and a Redfield reciever sight—1946 ish (the Flatband era) was when they quit rollmarking the tangs??—also has no accommodation for a tang sight??

Thanks PH

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12565
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 22, 2025 - 7:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Paul,

First, thank you very much for posting the information.

Model 55 s/n 1085105 was manufactured in late June 1932… can you verify the barrel date?

Model 55 s/n 1093482 was manufactured in early August 1934, and it was a “parts clean-up” production rifle.  Again, can you verify the barrel date?

Model 64 s/n 1095067 was manufactured in November 1934.

Model 64 s/n 1391416 was manufactured in late October 1946.  Winchester discontinued roll marking the upper tangs on August 23, 1942.  The serrated hammers were introduced in February 1947.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 36
Member Since:
July 22, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 22, 2025 - 5:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Not a certified decoder but I made an attempt

Bert— the barrel stampings on both have a poorly struck 32–that is upside down closest to the reciever??

MNC 30 WCF.    <      32  (upside down)——on #1093482

MNS 30 WCF.    <      32   (poorly struck) — on #1085105

FWIW the years aren’t very legible but all the other stamping are fairly well readable

Thanks again Bert and by the way I always stress out when I get out my screwdriver and “pretend” to be a gunsmith.
Thankful also that the button mags are fairly forgiving and simple

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12565
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
April 22, 2025 - 6:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Paul H said
Not a certified decoder but I made an attempt

Bert— the barrel stampings on both have a poorly struck 32–that is upside down closest to the reciever??

MNC 30 WCF.    <      32  (upside down)——on #1093482

MNS 30 WCF.    <      32   (poorly struck) — on #1085105

FWIW the years aren’t very legible but all the other stamping are fairly well readable

Thanks again Bert and by the way I always stress out when I get out my screwdriver and “pretend” to be a gunsmith.

Thankful also that the button mags are fairly forgiving and simple

  

I suspected that both would be marked “32”.

The button mag and the Tae Down rifles are usually very easy to disassemble for cleaning and viewing the hidden markings.  As long as you have the proper sized screwdriver (bits), it is easy to be a “pretend” gun smith.

Thanks,

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: XLIV
Guest(s) 171
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6166
Chuck: 5605
steve004: 5022
1873man: 4652
Big Larry: 2502
twobit: 2475
mrcvs: 2124
Maverick: 1928
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14409
Posts: 128170

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2019
Members: 9770
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation