June 26, 2013
OfflineHey Bert,
You have this one in your survey? This is the highest condition Spruce gun I’ve seen. However, photo 59 ruins it for me–what a shame!!
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1149964299
Don
April 15, 2005
OnlineDon,
It is a new Spruce Gun for the survey (it brings the total to 296), and yes, it is a crying shame some ignorant moron drilled the ugly extra hole in the upper tang. It is the 34th Spruce Gun documented with the “J.C. ’17” marking, and the 7th verified with a rack # stamped on the stock. It should not be too much longer before I log the 300th Spruce Gun in the survey thanks to you and the other WACA members finding and alerting them to me.
Thanks again,
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

March 15, 2020
OfflineGood morning Bert,
I think you are a bit harsh. There was a time when our guns were not sacrosanct. They were purchased for our use and this moron with macular degeneration would have a tang drilled for a tang sight so I could better use it. That would have been why I purchased it.
Respectfully, Don
June 26, 2013
Offline86Win said
Good morning Bert,
I think you are a bit harsh. There was a time when our guns were not sacrosanct. They were purchased for our use and this moron with macular degeneration would have a tang drilled for a tang sight so I could better use it. That would have been why I purchased it.
Respectfully, Don
Yes, but if the CORRECT tang sight were used, no extra hole would have been needed–and no longer a moron.
Just my 2 cents,
Don
November 7, 2015
OnlineNathan said
Its the same as sporterizing a mauser or springfield in the 50s. I understand why they did it but it’s still a shame today now that they’re valuable.
Have you considered that maybe the fact that so many were modified/sporterized is why the unmolested examples are so valuable?
Mike
1 Guest(s)
Log In
