All you 22 aficionado's.|Page 4|Winchester .22 Rim Fire|Forum|Winchester Collector

Avatar
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_MemberList Members
sp_Search Search
Advanced Search
Search
Forum Scope



Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Search Search
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
All you 22 aficionado's.
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Page: 1234Jump to page
Avatar
Location: 32000' +
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 2479
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
61
January 7, 2024 - 2:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said
Most modern repros that attempt to recreate the classic Schnable fail miserably, making it much too bulky & clumsy looking.

  

I agree, modern attempts at Schnabels are “clunky”, however the original German versions were very thin in the tapered forend and the Schnabel is a bit too small for me.  As Goldilocks said, “the Winchester Schnabels are just right”.

Best Regards,

WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire

http://rimfirepublications.com/  

sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Page: 1234Jump to page
sp_Feed
Go to top
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, 426crown, tionesta1, tim tomlinson, Bill Jokela, TXGunNut, Edward Kitner, Pwog, kevindpm61
Guest(s) 126
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6113
Chuck: 5566
steve004: 4997
1873man: 4643
deerhunter: 2612
Big Larry: 2500
twobit: 2470
mrcvs: 2113
Maverick: 1904
Newest Members:
bdjohn3006
dholjes
joe
Davil1961
Hurleyy2k
Toptom60
Malcolm
mikestan51
Illhuntit
Cord
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14356
Posts: 127587

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2012
Members: 9742
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, JWA, Heather Martin

© Copyright 2025 Winchester Collector

Navigation