Log In
November 7, 2015
Offline
High rings may be easier to find than thicker bases.
Mike
July 21, 2010
Offline
One more tidbit:
The receiver diameter is listed as 0.95 inches.
The diameter of the #12 base is listed as 0.925 while the #15 and #91 are listed as 0.946 so they would probably be better for an adhesive bonding attachment since they are more similar to the receiver.
Good luck.
EW
Edit to add:
Link to Weaver Mount Charts
March 14, 2022
Offline
Vince said
Robert said
just acquired a Model 66a for my son. The Walnut stock is drop dead gorgeous. The machining is flawless. I paid $200..which I thought was a lot..until I spent a day with it. This sort of quality is unobtainable today.
You have been bitten. There is no antidote, but it is not fatal. In fact it is quite enjoyable. These little Winchester 22’s sure do get under your skin. Welcome.
Yes Vince I’ve also been bitten by these little Winchester 22’s. Just finally acquired a first model 69 made 1935-1937 & has both original & short & LR magazines. JWA’s model 69 book has been invaluable with the information identifying the 69/69A.
I also have to give a shoutout to Lefty38-55 as well with the information he provided in this thread. I haven’t compared his information with JWA’s book but I didn’t notice any discrepancies at first glance so kudos to both for their respective work on model 69/69A.
A great little Winchester that I now have a penchant for. JWA’s book definitely expanded my passion.
RickC
Rick C
March 14, 2022
Offline
Meant to attach some photo’s of the newest acquisition.
Rick C
November 1, 2013
Offline
RickC said
Meant to attach some photo’s of the newest acquisition.
Nice. Couple of months ago, thought I was all set to buy a 69A Match, but seller backed out on deal.
March 14, 2022
Offline
Thanks Clarence. 69A Match is the final piece for my puzzle. Something to chase for now.
Rick C
December 31, 2012
Offline
A little late. I just sold mine. Real nice one too. I still have a genuine Target M69-A for sale. Big Larry
July 17, 2012
Offline
Wow, I just noticed this thread has been going on for almost 10 years! It certainly reflects the continued interest in the Model 69.
Best Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
November 1, 2013
Offline
JWA said
Wow, I just noticed this thread has been going on for almost 10 years!
Some threads can’t reach the stratosphere.
March 14, 2022
Offline
My 67 & 68 went to a good home as I decided to only pursue models 69 & 75. I picked up another 69A. Photo of the three.
Rick C
November 1, 2013
Offline
RickC said
My 67 & 68 went to a good home as I decided to only pursue models 69 & 75.
But that leaves two empty notches in your gun rack!
March 14, 2022
Offline
clarence said
RickC said
My 67 & 68 went to a good home as I decided to only pursue models 69 & 75.
But that leaves two empty notches in your gun rack!
Haha. For a Match & Target!
Rick C
November 7, 2015
Offline
RickC said
My 67 & 68 went to a good home as I decided to only pursue models 69 & 75. I picked up another 69A. Photo of the three.
Nice hat trick! As much as I enjoy the 69 I feel the 67 and 68 complement them nicely. OTOH it seems I lack focus but diversity has its merits. What scope is that?
Mike
March 14, 2022
Offline
Thanks Mike. It’s a Weaver Tip-Off 3/4″ circa late 50’s.
Rick C
November 1, 2013
Offline
RickC said
Thanks Mike. It’s a Weaver Tip-Off 3/4″ circa late 50’s.
Those mounts less obtrusive than two-piece mounts with their big protruding flanges on the sides. Looks like a Weaver J or B model, which I also like.
March 14, 2022
Offline
Another pic of the difference in the forestocks(1935/1949/1958).
Rick C
November 7, 2015
Offline
RickC said
Another pic of the difference in the forestocks(1935/1949/1958).
Thanks, I don’t get to look at the early 69’s often.
Mike
July 3, 2023
Offline
Good day, gentlemen! I was inspired to join and post specifically to respond to this thread, and ask a quick question if I could.
I am the proud owner of a 69A, inherited from my mother, who received it from her father…a rare gift in a family that did not have much to their name. It was her “rabbit gun”, and put a lot of meat on the table during hard times. She told me about herself and her brother using it to drive nails deep into the barn board with it, such was the accuracy it possessed…much to my grandfathers consternation.
It’s truly a beautiful gun, for all its scars.
My quick question is…I was fortunate enough to stumble across a 22-short clip for it at a flea market years ago. I recognized it as what it was immediately, even though I had no idea back then that such a thing existed. The Winchester logo followed by “69” confirmed it.
Earlier in this thread someone intimated that it might be a sought after item? Is that the case? Just curious…I would never sell the rifle itself of course.
Thank you for all the wonderful info about the 69A, it’s nice to know that its workmanship is appreciated by others. I always thought it was just me! ?
Cheers,
A Canadian Winchester fan.
July 17, 2012
Offline
Hi Dogteam and welcome to the WACA Forum!
The precursor Model 69 came standard with 2 magazines, one for .22 Long and Long Rifle and one specifically for .22 Short. When the design was updated and became the Winchester Model 69A it was determined that the .22 short cartridges would feed just fine from the long rifle magazine so the dedicated .22 Short magazine was discontinued. Your Model 69A would have only been supplied with the single magazine to cover all three chamberings.
Technically, there should be a .22 Short magazine for every Model 69 produced so that would mean there are at least 40,000-50,000 of them out there somewhere so they are not at all rare or hard to find. Now, having said that, the .22 Short magazine with the patent date marked follower for the Model 56 and 57 (which is interchangeable with the Model 69) is VERY hard to find as there were only about 5,000-6,000 of those made. The “69” marked .22 Short magazines sell in the $40-$50 range and the 56/57 .22 Short magazines sell in the $150-$200 range (IF you can find one). I am missing a few of the 56/57 .22 Short magazines for my rifles and still looking for a couple.
We would love to see pictures of your 69A and can probably tell you a bit more about it after seeing some detailed pictures. As a WACA guest you will have to use a 3rd party host site like Imgur or similar, or you can email them to me and I will post them for you.
Best Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
July 3, 2023
Offline
JWA said
Hi Dogteam and welcome to the WACA Forum!The precursor Model 69 came standard with 2 magazines, one for .22 Long and Long Rifle and one specifically for .22 Short. When the design was updated and became the Winchester Model 69A it was determined that the .22 short cartridges would feed just fine from the long rifle magazine so the dedicated .22 Short magazine was discontinued. Your Model 69A would have only been supplied with the single magazine to cover all three chamberings.
Technically, there should be a .22 Short magazine for every Model 69 produced so that would mean there are at least 40,000-50,000 of them out there somewhere so they are not at all rare or hard to find. Now, having said that, the .22 Short magazine with the patent date marked follower for the Model 56 and 57 (which is interchangeable with the Model 69) is VERY hard to find as there were only about 5,000-6,000 of those made. The “69” marked .22 Short magazines sell in the $40-$50 range and the 56/57 .22 Short magazines sell in the $150-$200 range (IF you can find one). I am missing a few of the 56/57 .22 Short magazines for my rifles and still looking for a couple.
We would love to see pictures of your 69A and can probably tell you a bit more about it after seeing some detailed pictures. As a WACA guest you will have to use a 3rd party host site like Imgur or similar, or you can email them to me and I will post them for you.
Best Regards,
Ah, I see! Well, at least I got a good deal on mine, it was in the $1 bin!?
Very kind of you to offer to post pics for me…I’ll try to see if I can work out the 3rd party thing first.
Cheers,
Dogteam
1 Guest(s)
