Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
62 condition
Avatar
bomar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
April 19, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 19, 2016 - 6:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have a model 62 dated 1938 that I’m thinking of selling ( I have a 1906 I prefer to shoot ).. 

In looking on sites like Gunbroker, I get more confused about how to list the gun.  A local dealer said he’d rate it at 70% but I see most of the ones for sale in poorer shape stating 80% or more.  

I also am confused on the blue book listing since it says a .22 short w/o roll die markings is rarer than a gallery.. 

Mine is a .22 short only.. non-gallery.  There is no roll die on it ( at least from what I’ve been able to figure out is a roll die ).

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13457
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
April 19, 2016 - 7:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Your Model 62 is a standard 22 Short rifle.  The Gallery variant is more common without the WINCHESTER roll marking on the left side of the receiver frame. In regards to the stated graded conditions, the majority of the sellers on Gunbroker overstate the graded condition, whereas when they are looking at your gun, the condition will usually be lower.  It is tough to get an accurate feel for what the graded condition of your rifle is from the pictures you posted, but it appearts to be in the 70-80% range.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
bomar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
April 19, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 19, 2016 - 8:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Do you know why the blue book states:  “.22 short only models without the Winchester roll die receiver marking are more scarce than the so-called “Gallery Rifle” ”    ?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13457
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
April 19, 2016 - 9:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Like many other mistakes in the Blue Book… the people editing have no clue.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
supergimp
Los Angeles
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
January 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
April 19, 2016 - 10:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Speaking of which, Bert, what’s the situation with the red book? Is there a current version available somewhere?

WACA Member. CFM Member. NRA Lifer.

Avatar
bomar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
April 19, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
April 19, 2016 - 10:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thank you for your answers. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Bert H., Jim F in CT, Maverick, 1ned1, antler1, TR, Alexander Sanguigni, Buck1967
Guest(s) 452
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6772
Chuck: 6111
steve004: 5324
1873man: 4776
deerhunter: 2782
Big Larry: 2578
twobit: 2562
mrcvs: 2285
Maverick: 2080
Newest Members:
Tony Short
Michael Polachek
Cotyr8807
Morg1960
Centennialrifle
fordwannabe
Chip
Bowhunter1965
wjs_vienna
Mountain guy
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15167
Posts: 136488

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10271
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation