Log In
April 10, 2015
Offline
Hello folks, I just received two 1894 Saddle Ring Carbine Rifles 30 WCF with manufacture dates going to 1917. They are surprisingly in better shape than I thought when the seller told me about them. On both rifles, the bores are literally 100% mint, sharp, and SHINY as can be. The blueing on one is roughly 90% and the other is 80%. Both are very nice though.
I am not a Winchester nut, nor am I a rifle or 30 30 shooter. So, I must say, I probably do not appreciate these as much as I should.
I am curious as to the thought on restoration of these rifles? If I own something (esp firearms) I like them to look new…. and I understand that these are nearly 100 years old. Should I leave these be? If I am going to restore them, I obviously would only do so with making them perfect. I also may just sell these to someone who appreciates them for what they are.
Any thoughts, help, advise… I certainly do not want to kill these or the value if they are worth more than I expect… or decrease the value because they were restored.
Thanks,
B
April 15, 2005
Offline
Bobby,
Based on your description of guns, it would be a colossal mistake to “restore” or refinish them. Your would instantly reduce the value by a minimum of 50%, not including the added cost of having the work done. Winchester Model 94 SRCs that are still in 80% – 90% original (unrefinished) condition are worth a LOT more than one that has been refinished.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
April 10, 2015
Offline
Im not sure if I am allowed to do this but, here is a link to a post I made with pics of the rifle. Can anyone give me a thought on value of these?
http://www.shootersforum.com/showthread.php?p=814506#post814506
August 27, 2014
Offline
Nothing to be gained by refinishing either of these guns….
“If you can’t convince them, confuse them”
President Harry S. Truman
September 29, 1993
Offline
Bobby:
I collect Model 1894 carbines and agree with all the comments made by others. These are both well above average condition carbines in 100% original condition. The “flaking” or discoloration on the receiver of the one gun is a common occurrence and would indicate that the gun was carried and stored without being wiped down or cleaned and coated with a light coat of gun oil. A ball park retail value on the two guns would be about $4,500 or $$2,750 on the nicer one and $1,750 on the lesser condition piece in the current condition.
WACA Life Benefactor Member
NRA Life Member
April 10, 2015
Offline
Rick Hill said
Bobby:
I collect Model 1894 carbines and agree with all the comments made by others. These are both well above average condition carbines in 100% original condition. The “flaking” or discoloration on the receiver of the one gun is a common occurrence and would indicate that the gun was carried and stored without being wiped down or cleaned and coated with a light coat of gun oil. A ball park retail value on the two guns would be about $4,500 or $$2,750 on the nicer one and $1,750 on the lesser condition piece in the current condition.
Christ… my mind was just blown. I had no idea these rifles could be worth that much money.
April 15, 2005
Offline
Bobby Cundiff said
Im not sure if I am allowed to do this but, here is a link to a post I made with pics of the rifle. Can anyone give me a thought on value of these?
http://www.shootersforum.com/showthread.php?p=814506#post814506
The fellow who told you they were made in 1919 is off the mark a few years. Per the Winchester PR serialization records, both were manufactured in 1917.
I am in complete agreement with Rick’s value assessment.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
April 10, 2015
Offline
Bert H. said
Bobby Cundiff said
Im not sure if I am allowed to do this but, here is a link to a post I made with pics of the rifle. Can anyone give me a thought on value of these?
http://www.shootersforum.com/showthread.php?p=814506#post814506
The fellow who told you they were made in 1919 is off the mark a few years. Per the Winchester PR serialization records, both were manufactured in 1917.
I am in complete agreement with Rick’s value assessment.
Bert
Yep, I did the serial research through your this sites data base… and 1917 on both!
I am still in amazement with the value there.
September 22, 2011
Offline
While the second of the two is clearly the nicer of the two firearms, I don’t think I would go quite as high as $2,750 on the second one, unless the finish on the buttstock better reflected the condition of the blued metal parts. I think the streaking of the finish due to loss of original finish detracts from the value, and I would think that $2350 to $2500 would be the maximum this firearm would be worth at retail sale.
1 Guest(s)
