Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Stain for gumwood stocks
Avatar
fzando
PA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
September 13, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 5, 2026 - 7:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I will be in the process of removing the old lacquer/varnish, whatever is on it, on a 1905 1894 SCR stock and returning it to an oil finish.  I have noticed gumwood stocks that have been stripped are not the same color as when they left the factory.  So I am sure some type of stain was used to get it to the Winchester color.  Does anybody have a recommendation on what color stain I should use to get it “close” to the original color? And any other tip to help me through this process.  And no, I am not going to sand it after removing the finish.  I am leaving the character right where it is.  The people who put the surface finish on it did not take any time to sand or fuss with the wood. They just grabbed a paintbrush and slapped it on, and it looks exactly as it sounds.  

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13571
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 5, 2026 - 8:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

fzando said
I will be in the process of removing the old lacquer/varnish, whatever is on it, on a 1905 1894 SCR stock and returning it to an oil finish.  I have noticed gumwood stocks that have been stripped are not the same color as when they left the factory.  So I am sure some type of stain was used to get it to the Winchester color.  Does anybody have a recommendation on what color stain I should use to get it “close” to the original color? And any other tip to help me through this process.  And no, I am not going to sand it after removing the finish.  I am leaving the character right where it is.  The people who put the surface finish on it did not take any time to sand or fuss with the wood. They just grabbed a paintbrush and slapped it on, and it looks exactly as it sounds.  
  

I am not of the opinion that there is No “one size fits all” color for the gumwood stocks.  Based on my observations, the color variations found on the gumwood stock guns varied from relatively light red/brown to dark brown.  In your shoes, I would look for a “walnut” stain.

Are you sure that your SRC is a 1905 production gun?  The reason I ask, is that Winchester used Walnut up through 1905, and then switched to Gumwood in early 1906.  What is the serial number on your SRC?

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Alaska94
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 105
Member Since:
June 15, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 5, 2026 - 9:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I just finished redoing a gumwood stock and forearm. I used Liberon BLO250 Boiled Linseed Oil. Here’s what mine came out looking like:

IMG_0373.jpegImage Enlarger

IMG_0374.jpegImage Enlarger

The first coat was 50/50 BLO/Mineral Spirits, followed by 5 coats of 100% BLO. These pics are before hand burnishing and waxing to finish.

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
fzando
PA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
September 13, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 6, 2026 - 12:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Burt,

According to the date of manufacture database, 275121 was manufactured in 1905, just verified.  Based on some of your comments on other posts, I know you said Gumwood was after this date.  I am not really sure what this wood is, but looking at the lack of grain in the wood and  the white streaks in it, it appears to be gum to me.  When I strip off the surface material, I will then know for sure and post the results if you are keeping a database on the type of wood on this model. I want to go with a more reddish color than dark walnut. But if that does not cover the whiteness, I might go darker. The middle gun on your signature block is what I am aiming for. 

Alaska94

The white streaks on the right side of your project are what I would like to cover with a stain before putting on the oil.  I have used BLO for many years and understand the application process. This gumwood, if that is what it ends up being, is different from the walnut stocks I have done in the past.

Thanks for your comments

Frank

Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1015
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
January 6, 2026 - 1:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I would like to see the pics either way if you don’t mind posting…

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13571
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 6, 2026 - 6:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

fzando said
Burt,
According to the date of manufacture database, 275121 was manufactured in 1905, just verified.  Based on some of your comments on other posts, I know you said Gumwood was after this date.  I am not really sure what this wood is, but looking at the lack of grain in the wood and  the white streaks in it, it appears to be gum to me.  When I strip off the surface material, I will then know for sure and post the results if you are keeping a database on the type of wood on this model. I want to go with a more reddish color than dark walnut. But if that does not cover the whiteness, I might go darker. The middle gun on your signature block is what I am aiming for. 
Alaska94
The white streaks on the right side of your project are what I would like to cover with a stain before putting on the oil.  I have used BLO for many years and understand the application process. This gumwood, if that is what it ends up being, is different from the walnut stocks I have done in the past.
Thanks for your comments
Frank
  

275121 identifies your Model 1894 as a mid August 1905 production receiver frame.  If the receiver frame was not immediately used to assemble a complete SRC, it is very likely that it has Gumwood stocks. The probability that it was not immediately used to assemble your SRC is actually quite high.

What many collectors may not be aware of, is the fact that the production of the Model 1894 SRCs was considerably slower (less) than the Rifle variant through the year 1913.  Per the survey of the Model 1894 records conducted by the CFM that encompassed serial numbers 1 – 353999 (documented in the ARMAX Vol 5), 78.2% of the Model 1894 production consisted of the Rifle variant, with just 21.2% of the production being SRCs. 

ARMAX-M1894-Production-Statistics.jpgImage Enlarger

My research survey of the Model 1894 beginning at serial number 354000 (picking up where the available records end) has determined that the Rifle vs. Carbine production ratio remained strongly in favor of the Rifle variant.  Currently I have documented 3,961 Model 1894s that are in the 354000 – 645304 serial range (May 1907 through December 1913), and the production ratio to this point is 2,646:1,315 (66.8% rifles vs. 33.2% carbines).  1914 was the first year that saw a greater number of Carbines produced than Rifles, and the primary reason for that shift in production was the 15,100 Carbines that were manufactured to fill the French WW I contract.

While Winchester had used Gumwood beginning with the Model 1900 (bolt-action single .22 rim fire), they did not begin using it as a standard item for the more expensive Model 1892 and Model 1894 Carbines until late 1905 or early 1906.  I have not (yet) been able to pin down a specific date for that change.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6180
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
January 7, 2026 - 6:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

fzando said
I will be in the process of removing the old lacquer/varnish, whatever is on it, on a 1905 1894 SCR stock and returning it to an oil finish.  I have noticed gumwood stocks that have been stripped are not the same color as when they left the factory.  So I am sure some type of stain was used to get it to the Winchester color.  Does anybody have a recommendation on what color stain I should use to get it “close” to the original color? And any other tip to help me through this process.  And no, I am not going to sand it after removing the finish.  I am leaving the character right where it is.  The people who put the surface finish on it did not take any time to sand or fuss with the wood. They just grabbed a paintbrush and slapped it on, and it looks exactly as it sounds.  
  

Once the finish is removed you have to experiment with different stains.  Start with the lighter walnuts or similar.  A darker or black can be used sparingly just to cover the white areas.  This type of wood usually gets darker than walnut when stained. 

Avatar
fzando
PA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
September 13, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
January 8, 2026 - 5:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have removed the old lacquer finish, and what I am looking at is not gumwood, as I assumed it would be, but a rather unremarkable piece of walnut. If anybody thinks otherwise, please let me know.

The question concerning the actual date of assembly due to slow-moving demand is interesting.  I don’t believe this happened to this gun, as the barrel date is a “3”.

Based on these two observations, I conclude this is a walnut-stocked 1905 SRC manufactured in August 1905.  Correct me if my assumption needs correcting. IMG_E38801.JPGImage Enlarger

IMG_E38851.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13571
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
January 8, 2026 - 5:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

fzando said
I have removed the old lacquer finish, and what I am looking at is not gumwood, as I assumed it would be, but a rather unremarkable piece of walnut. If anybody thinks otherwise, please let me know.
The question concerning the actual date of assembly due to slow-moving demand is interesting.  I don’t believe this happened to this gun, as the barrel date is a “3”.
Based on these two observations, I conclude this is a walnut-stocked 1905 SRC manufactured in August 1905.  Correct me if my assumption needs correcting.
  

The “3” is not a date stamp.  It is a standard marking applied during the process of manufacturing and inspecting the barrel.  Winchester did not begin date stamping their barrels until the year 1920.

The pictures you provided of the stripped stock are not clear enough (closeup) to determine which type of wood they are.  A picture of the end grain on the butt stock would help.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6180
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
January 8, 2026 - 7:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

At this point I’d very lightly sand the wood with 400 grit or finer.  Use a backer block while sanding so it all stays straight.  Don’t sand enough to get rid of the dents.  If you wish you can experiment with stains.  Just do a very small spot and use the lightest stain first.  Then use boiled linseed oil until the wood stops soaking it in.  Let it dry between coats and use a rag to remove the excess.  Keep rubbing until it does not feel gummy.  You can then hand polish if you want more of a sheen. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Gregory, Manuel, Tedk, Robert Vivas, TXGunNut, oldcrankyyankee, Danny Triplett, Jeremy P, gizmost
Guest(s) 632
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6861
Chuck: 6180
steve004: 5369
1873man: 4791
deerhunter: 2785
twobit: 2586
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2296
Maverick: 2095
Newest Members:
The Draw
MattSpencer
Bronco17
Edcamera
Rich44-40
Jacques Emond
DanPfromTexas
Emammad14
RP Guest
jlb
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15268
Posts: 137588

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10339
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation