Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 77
Member Since:
May 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 12, 2013 - 9:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I purchased an 1873 Carbine in 44 40 this past weekend. It is a 400,000 serial #. I can get it and be exact if needed. It has aome proof marks which look English.

My question is about the Tang. It is marked 1873 but is not drilled for a Tang Sight. Madis doesnt show this as a variation.

Any thoughts? It has the wrong carbine sight on it. Should it have the one marked 1873?

Thanks
Rex

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2470
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 13, 2013 - 5:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Good morning,

According to Jim Gordon the upper tangs of carbines were less commonly D&T with the holes for a folding peep sight.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6103
Chuck: 5556
steve004: 4987
1873man: 4637
Big Larry: 2500
twobit: 2470
mrcvs: 2107
Maverick: 1898
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14344
Posts: 127461

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2012
Members: 9738
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation