73 Tang|Restoration, Repair and Maintenance|Forum|Winchester Collector

Avatar
sp_LogInOut Log In
sp_Search Search
Advanced Search
Search
Forum Scope



Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Search Search
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
73 Tang
Avatar
Rex Mahan
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
May 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 12, 2013 - 9:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I purchased an 1873 Carbine in 44 40 this past weekend. It is a 400,000 serial #. I can get it and be exact if needed. It has aome proof marks which look English.

My question is about the Tang. It is marked 1873 but is not drilled for a Tang Sight. Madis doesnt show this as a variation.

Any thoughts? It has the wrong carbine sight on it. Should it have the one marked 1873?

Thanks
Rex

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2505
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 13, 2013 - 5:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good morning,

According to Jim Gordon the upper tangs of carbines were less commonly D&T with the holes for a folding peep sight.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

sp_Feed
Go to top
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Tedk, DEEREHART, Louis Luttrell, TXGunNut, Thomas Beckwith, gene66
Guest(s) 234
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6488
Chuck: 5890
steve004: 5217
1873man: 4706
deerhunter: 2713
Big Larry: 2561
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2213
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Andy
James Luoma
DM2012
redfish282000
MFoster
Daltsav
Monk1950
Redcedar7T
KrzHorse
drjjpdc
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14829
Posts: 132765

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10063
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather

© Copyright 2025 Winchester Collector

Navigation