73 Tang|Restoration, Repair and Maintenance|Forum|Winchester Collector

Avatar
sp_LogInOut Log In
sp_Search Search
Advanced Search
Search
Forum Scope



Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Search Search
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
73 Tang
Avatar
Rex Mahan
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
May 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 12, 2013 - 9:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I purchased an 1873 Carbine in 44 40 this past weekend. It is a 400,000 serial #. I can get it and be exact if needed. It has aome proof marks which look English.

My question is about the Tang. It is marked 1873 but is not drilled for a Tang Sight. Madis doesnt show this as a variation.

Any thoughts? It has the wrong carbine sight on it. Should it have the one marked 1873?

Thanks
Rex

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2540
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 13, 2013 - 5:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good morning,

According to Jim Gordon the upper tangs of carbines were less commonly D&T with the holes for a folding peep sight.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

sp_Feed
Go to top
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: deerhunter, Tedk, TXGunNut, TR, Rube Burrow, helidriver72, Glshuck, cwmfour
Guest(s) 728
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6632
Chuck: 5964
steve004: 5265
1873man: 4732
deerhunter: 2728
Big Larry: 2574
twobit: 2540
mrcvs: 2232
Maverick: 2049
Newest Members:
eduarget
Maxwell Winchester
Countyab
cwmfour
Shadams3
mojowojo
Mr_Big_Country81
VAGeek
Kenzilena98
WER4USM
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14964
Posts: 134183

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10161
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather

© Copyright 2025 Winchester Collector

Navigation