73 Tang|Restoration, Repair and Maintenance|Forum|Winchester Collector

Avatar
sp_LogInOut Log In
sp_Search Search
Advanced Search
Search
Forum Scope



Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Search Search
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
73 Tang
Avatar
Rex Mahan
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
May 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 12, 2013 - 9:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I purchased an 1873 Carbine in 44 40 this past weekend. It is a 400,000 serial #. I can get it and be exact if needed. It has aome proof marks which look English.

My question is about the Tang. It is marked 1873 but is not drilled for a Tang Sight. Madis doesnt show this as a variation.

Any thoughts? It has the wrong carbine sight on it. Should it have the one marked 1873?

Thanks
Rex

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2623
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 13, 2013 - 5:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good morning,

According to Jim Gordon the upper tangs of carbines were less commonly D&T with the holes for a folding peep sight.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

sp_Feed
Go to top
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: steve004, Chuck, 1ned1, win4575, cjs57, keith shaffer, Zebulon, M64lvr
Guest(s) 534
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 7068
Chuck: 6403
steve004: 5486
1873man: 4840
deerhunter: 2846
twobit: 2623
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2344
Maverick: 2144
Newest Members:
Crustynuts
cmj8591
Cobengo
James Miller
Dr. Huesman
Nautilus4531
CLAchamp
JDUB
Bill
lawnman
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15510
Posts: 140543

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10449
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather

© Copyright 2026 Winchester Collector

Navigation