Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1886 receiverdifferaces
Avatar
hugocowboy
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
June 11, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 3, 2014 - 4:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Is there a differnce in a large cal 1886 receiver compared to a small cal.

Avatar
Mike Hunter
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 352
Member Since:
January 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 5, 2014 - 11:25 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Generally there is no difference in 86 frames as far as caliber. I said generally because some of the 1886s in 50 EX were hand modified by Winchester.

The major transition in 86 frames when Winchester modified the frames for smokeless powder, these are commonly referred to as “smokeless” frames, while the earlier frames are referred to as “black powder” frames. Then very late in the 86 production Winchester incorporated the screw in magazine tube.

Avatar
25-20
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
July 6, 2014 - 7:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have a late 86 in 33 WCF and it has a screw in mag tube as indicated by the ‘A’ suffix to the ser# . I was wondering why Winchester bothered to tool up for this change , An experiment ? I dont think they tried it on other solid frame models ?

Phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13310
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
July 6, 2014 - 8:01 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Phil,

I believe that the screw in magazine tube was also used on the Model 71 as well.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Wincacher
New Mexico
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1167
Member Since:
December 1, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
November 5, 2014 - 6:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Actually, there is a difference in receivers, but not due to caliber.  The differences are due to date of manufacture.

TYPE 1:  up to about serial # 83,000 – the height of the receiver is 2 13/32″ (measured at the front of the receiver).

TYPE 2:  from 83,001 to end – the height is 2 5/32″

TYPE 3:  take-down receivers which also had the same dimensions and dates as above.

1876-4-1.jpg

"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Bert H., deerhunter, Darrin Smith, Ricklin, David Swenson
Guest(s) 337
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6706
Chuck: 6033
steve004: 5293
1873man: 4764
deerhunter: 2751
Big Larry: 2578
twobit: 2550
mrcvs: 2274
Maverick: 2062
Newest Members:
Old-timer
Wdkirk01
F54
BPJACK
Badger557
B_Hank28
Dsauld
Mdo222
donrull
1942 Remington
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15067
Posts: 135410

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10224
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation