Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Effective range of a 30-30 lever action rifle
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
41
February 1, 2023 - 11:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The M1892 is a strong action and I’ve seen more than one later production ’92 rechambered to .44 magnum.  I also know some hunters loaded .44-40 in a ’92 with jacketed bullets up to near .44 magnum performance.  What are the thoughts performance comparison of modern factory .30-30 ammo vs. .44-40 loaded to the level I mentioned?

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1710
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
42
February 1, 2023 - 11:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

28 gauge said
 

 

 The 44-40 as factory loaded today is kept to low pressure.However ,in the past a high velocity  load was available for it.I wonder what the velocity of that HV load was and its hitting power?

  

 In the 1918 catalog they list “Model 92 Special WHV” at 1563fps with a 200gr bullet. The standard load is 1300fps with a 200gr bullet also. T/R

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 547
Member Since:
March 14, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
43
February 2, 2023 - 12:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

twobit said
I am in the kitchen cooking some rabbit for dinner so don’t hold me to perfect accuracy here.  Modern Winchester and Remington 44-40 shoots around 1200 fps.  Black Hills ammunition is right at 800 fps.

Michael

  

Micheal awesome reply. You just took me back to the good ole days! My thoughts are somewhere else right now from days gone by(thank you) but yes BH is approx 800 fps. 

 RickC 

   

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
44
February 2, 2023 - 12:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Regarding the .44-40, my Lyman Reloading Handbook (which I purchased new in 1982) lists Winchester Model 92 and Marlin Model 94 as test rifles.  For 200 Remington jacketed soft point bullets, they list maximum loads that generate up to 2079 fps. 

Paging forward to the Lyman .44 magnum rifle loads, they don’t list a 200 grain bullet.  However, their maximum load for a 225 jacketed bullet generated 1872 fps.

Switching to my Hornady Handbook (1982) they list a .44 magnum rifle maximum load with a 200 grain soft point bullet reaching 2100 fps.  So – only 21 fps faster than the top 200 grain .44-40 load.  I suppose this makes sense as the .44-40 and .44 magnum have similar case capacities.  And if you fill them with the same powders, with all the powder they will hold, the results should be darn similar.  

Avatar
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1042
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
45
February 2, 2023 - 12:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

28 gauge said

 The 44-40 as factory loaded today is kept to low pressure.However ,in the past a high velocity  load was available for it.I wonder what the velocity of that HV load was and its hitting power?

  

The Winchester 1905 catalog lists the Energy of Bullets (at 50 ft)  for the standard 44-40 load at 688 ft/lbs (velocity 1245 fps) , and for the WHV, 999 ft/lbs (velocity 1500 fps).   I think when you start trying to push these bullets and bores beyond velocities they were intended, your accuracy goes down, you run the risk of damaging your rifle, and your just wasting powder.  Winchester spent a lot more time and money researching and designing cartridges for each caliber than likely all our combined experiences, to find what what works best.  So sticking to those parameters has always worked for me. 

That deer at the end of the rifle sights isnt going to know if you shoot him with a 1200 fps or 1500 fps load or if it was a 180 grain or 220 grain bullet – he’s just going to know he’s been hit, and may be dead depending on your shot placement.  At these velocities your not going to get much expansion, especially if you use hard cast bullets or even possibly jacketed bullets (unless they are hollow-point).  Most entrance and exit wounds are close to the same diameter in my experience.  Thats why Ive switched to the softer lead casts using 20/1 & 30/1, or mix of the two with a little better expansion recognized in exit wounds on hogs and deer.   

As a note, the 38-40 WHV load with 180 grain bullet had 1154 ft/lbs of energy at 50 feet at 1700 fps velocity and was equivalent to our outperformed the 44-40 in wood board penetration tests using a soft point bullet or full metal patched bullets, as per the 1905 catalog. 

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 825
Member Since:
March 23, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
46
February 2, 2023 - 4:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

1892takedown said
 

That deer at the end of the rifle sights isnt going to know if you shoot him with a 1200 fps or 1500 fps load or if it was a 180 grain or 220 grain bullet – he’s just going to know he’s been hit, and may be dead depending on your shot placement.  At these velocities your not going to get much expansion, especially if you use hard cast bullets or even possibly jacketed bullets (unless they are hollow-point).  Most entrance and exit wounds are close to the same diameter in my experience.  Thats why Ive switched to the softer lead casts using 20/1 & 30/1, or mix of the two with a little better expansion recognized in exit wounds on hogs and deer.   

As a note, the 38-40 WHV load with 180 grain bullet had 1154 ft/lbs of energy at 50 feet at 1700 fps velocity and was equivalent to our outperformed the 44-40 in wood board penetration tests using a soft point bullet or full metal patched bullets, as per the 1905 catalog. 

  

 Very interesting,1892.In the past I have bagged deer with the Model 1886 .45-70 using factory 405 grain bullets.Like you with your 44-40,I found the entrance and exit to be about the same size.

 

 Interesting that the 38-40 WHV out preformed the 44-40 WHV.I know another old fellow,now gone as well,who use to shoot moose with a Model 92 38-40 carbine.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4571
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
47
February 2, 2023 - 5:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I think at close range it really doesn’t matter if you are using a standard velocity 44 WCF or a 30 WCF.  I have killed a lot of deer with a shotgun that shoots slugs at about 1350 FPS.  It’s all about shot placement.  If you blow through the heart or lungs the hole size doesn’t matter.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
48
February 2, 2023 - 5:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1892takedown said

28 gauge said

 The 44-40 as factory loaded today is kept to low pressure.However ,in the past a high velocity  load was available for it.I wonder what the velocity of that HV load was and its hitting power?

  

The Winchester 1905 catalog lists the Energy of Bullets (at 50 ft)  for the standard 44-40 load at 688 ft/lbs (velocity 1245 fps) , and for the WHV, 999 ft/lbs (velocity 1500 fps).   I think when you start trying to push these bullets and bores beyond velocities they were intended, your accuracy goes down, you run the risk of damaging your rifle, and your just wasting powder.  Winchester spent a lot more time and money researching and designing cartridges for each caliber than likely all our combined experiences, to find what what works best.  So sticking to those parameters has always worked for me. 

That deer at the end of the rifle sights isnt going to know if you shoot him with a 1200 fps or 1500 fps load or if it was a 180 grain or 220 grain bullet – he’s just going to know he’s been hit, and may be dead depending on your shot placement.  At these velocities your not going to get much expansion, especially if you use hard cast bullets or even possibly jacketed bullets (unless they are hollow-point).  Most entrance and exit wounds are close to the same diameter in my experience.  Thats why Ive switched to the softer lead casts using 20/1 & 30/1, or mix of the two with a little better expansion recognized in exit wounds on hogs and deer.   

As a note, the 38-40 WHV load with 180 grain bullet had 1154 ft/lbs of energy at 50 feet at 1700 fps velocity and was equivalent to our outperformed the 44-40 in wood board penetration tests using a soft point bullet or full metal patched bullets, as per the 1905 catalog. 

  

Let me ask it this way.  Aside from collector considerations, how ill-advised (e.g. not safe) do people here think it is to rebarrel a later production M1892 to .44 magnum?  Or, rechamber to .44 magnum?  As I stated above, the .44-40 holds about the same powder as a .44 magnum and shoots about the same bullet (or if you reload, perhaps exactly the same bullet).  

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4571
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
49
February 2, 2023 - 5:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I can’t answer your question but I would suggest you check the chamber pressure to make sure you are not going over the pressure the original barrel has been proof tested for. 

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
50
February 2, 2023 - 6:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

Let me ask it this way.  Aside from collector considerations, how ill-advised (e.g. not safe) do people here think it is to rebarrel a later production M1892 to .44 magnum?  Or, rechamber to .44 magnum?  As I stated above, the .44-40 holds about the same powder as a .44 magnum and shoots about the same bullet (or if you reload, perhaps exactly the same bullet).  

What would be the point if you’re handloading, since the .44-40 case can be loaded up to .44 Mag performance?  I expect many ’92s have been rechambered without blowing up, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they loosened up after a sufficient number of rounds were fired, leading to excess headspace, which all rear-locking actions are susceptible to. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
51
February 2, 2023 - 8:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

steve004 said

Let me ask it this way.  Aside from collector considerations, how ill-advised (e.g. not safe) do people here think it is to rebarrel a later production M1892 to .44 magnum?  Or, rechamber to .44 magnum?  As I stated above, the .44-40 holds about the same powder as a .44 magnum and shoots about the same bullet (or if you reload, perhaps exactly the same bullet).  

What would be the point if you’re handloading, since the .44-40 case can be loaded up to .44 Mag performance?  I expect many ’92s have been rechambered without blowing up, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they loosened up after a sufficient number of rounds were fired, leading to excess headspace, which all rear-locking actions are susceptible to. 

  

I mentioned seeing M1892’s rechambered to .44 magnum over the years.  I suspect at least part of the motivation to do so was to be able to use factory .44 magnum ammunition.  Chuck’s point about the barrel proofing capacity is a good one.  They are three things in play here:  the strength of the action, the strength of the barrel and the strength of the brass used (I suspect .44 magnum brass is stronger than modern .44-40 brass)

With a M1892 that has been rebarreled to .44 magnum, it is only the strength of the action inplay.  We know the design of the action is adequate for .44 magnum rifles.  There are various more recent manufacture, “Winchester” versions of the M1892 in .44 magnum that have come out.  I have also been intrigued (but not interested in owning) the Rossi .454 Casull which is based on a ’92 action design.  The steel used in an action on a late production vintage M1892 compares how, to the more recent manufactured, “Winchester” M1892 and the Rossi?

Avatar
North Carolina
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 132
Member Since:
February 11, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
52
February 12, 2023 - 5:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Which case is the 44 Magnum, the other two are 44-40

Image Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
53
February 12, 2023 - 9:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bryan Austin said
Which case is the 44 Magnum, the other two are 44-40

Image Enlarger

  

I can’t say I can tell – which I’m sure it what this photo is supposed to demonstrate.  It begs the question why did the world need a .44 magnum?  The predecessor to the .44 magnum was the .44 special.  And I can see how lengthening the .44 special case allowed more powder.  But wait, there was already the .44-40 that held the same amount of powder and fired the same bullet.  I know, supposedly the .44-40 shoots a .427 bullet.  However, my Lyman Handbook notes the cast bullets used were sized to .430.  And in their two test rifles, the Winchester M1892 has a grove diameter of .432 and the Marlin Model 94, .436!

I suppose the answer is the older guns such as M1873’s and Colt SAA’s.  The .450 Marlin can’t do anything a .45-70 can’t do, except it can’t be fired in a .45-70 chamber.  I know some smaller companies have produced some very hot .45-70 loads.  They print clear warnings on the boxes to not fire them in old guns. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1706
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
54
February 12, 2023 - 9:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

9AB0AFA6-E73E-41A3-B117-FF6AB5CE8382.jpegImage Enlargersteve004 said 3AE40300-2BA4-4E29-925F-114BF75E4312.jpegImage Enlarger

Bryan Austin said

Which case is the 44 Magnum, the other two are 44-40

Image Enlarger

  

I can’t say I can tell – which I’m sure it what this photo is supposed to demonstrate.  It begs the question why did the world need a .44 magnum?  The predecessor to the .44 magnum was the .44 special.    

Darn good question!

If you have a Smith & Wesson Target Model Triple Lock revolver chambered in .44 S & W Special, why ever would you need a firearm chambered in .44 Magnum?

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1706
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
55
February 12, 2023 - 9:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

B160F9D6-0B9D-4ADD-802B-13F7BB7FE59B.jpegImage EnlargerB9FC3FB6-1F15-4690-9890-AD2FE11079D0.jpegImage Enlarger7FBADCD1-0181-4D32-8365-A6B81C27E206.jpegImage EnlargerFB358058-653A-48CA-86FE-18D2F36823E0.jpegImage EnlargerI’ll never figure out the photographs on this site and how to do it.  Here’s four of the six I wanted to post and some decided to flip upside down as well.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1706
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
56
February 12, 2023 - 9:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1552FD1C-2A85-4605-ABDF-B461E42E61EF.jpegImage EnlargerAnd one more…

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
57
February 12, 2023 - 9:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

mrcvs said

9AB0AFA6-E73E-41A3-B117-FF6AB5CE8382.jpegImage Enlargersteve004 said 3AE40300-2BA4-4E29-925F-114BF75E4312.jpegImage Enlarger

Bryan Austin said

Which case is the 44 Magnum, the other two are 44-40

Image Enlarger

  

I can’t say I can tell – which I’m sure it what this photo is supposed to demonstrate.  It begs the question why did the world need a .44 magnum?  The predecessor to the .44 magnum was the .44 special.    

Darn good question!

If you have a Smith & Wesson Target Model Triple Lock revolver chambered in .44 S & W Special, why ever would you need a firearm chambered in .44 Magnum?

  

And, if the .44 S&W Special wasn’t powerful enough, there was the more powerful .44-40 WHV available!

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10726
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
58
February 12, 2023 - 9:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

mrcvs said

9AB0AFA6-E73E-41A3-B117-FF6AB5CE8382.jpegImage Enlargersteve004 said 3AE40300-2BA4-4E29-925F-114BF75E4312.jpegImage Enlarger

Bryan Austin said

Which case is the 44 Magnum, the other two are 44-40

Image Enlarger

  

I can’t say I can tell – which I’m sure it what this photo is supposed to demonstrate.  It begs the question why did the world need a .44 magnum?  The predecessor to the .44 magnum was the .44 special.    

Darn good question!

If you have a Smith & Wesson Target Model Triple Lock revolver chambered in .44 S & W Special, why ever would you need a firearm chambered in .44 Magnum?  

OK, I’ll bite on that question… Because you cannot shoot a 220-gr FMJ load @1900 fps out of that S&W without it blowing up in your hands! OTH, my Ruger Super Red Hawk .44 Mag loves it!!  When I used to regularly compete in IHMSA matches, I would usually shoot 500-rounds per month of that load in that gun, and I shot it in competition for nearly 6-years before I stopped competition shooting.  These days on the rare occasion that I shoot that gun, I run 180-gr Sierra JHP loads @1975 fps through it (I now have a Leupold M8-2X scope on it).  It will cleanly take deer sized animals out to 100-yards.

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1706
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
59
February 12, 2023 - 9:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

mrcvs said

9AB0AFA6-E73E-41A3-B117-FF6AB5CE8382.jpegImage Enlargersteve004 said 3AE40300-2BA4-4E29-925F-114BF75E4312.jpegImage Enlarger

Bryan Austin said

Which case is the 44 Magnum, the other two are 44-40

Image Enlarger

  

I can’t say I can tell – which I’m sure it what this photo is supposed to demonstrate.  It begs the question why did the world need a .44 magnum?  The predecessor to the .44 magnum was the .44 special.    

Darn good question!

If you have a Smith & Wesson Target Model Triple Lock revolver chambered in .44 S & W Special, why ever would you need a firearm chambered in .44 Magnum?  

OK, I’ll bite on that question… Because you cannot shoot a 220-gr FMJ load @1900 fps out of that S&W without it blowing up in your hands! OTH, my Ruger Super Red Hawk .44 Mag loves it!!  When I used to regularly compete in IHMSA matches, I would usually shoot 500-rounds per month of that load in that gun, and I shot it in competition for nearly 6-years before I stopped competition shooting.  These days on the rare occasion that I shoot that gun, I run 180-gr Sierra JHP loads @1975 fps through it (I now have a Leupold M8-2X scope on it).  It will cleanly take deer sized animals out to 100-yards. 

Bert, now that makes total sense.  But my Triple Lock revolver is CLASSIC!

Avatar
North Carolina
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 132
Member Since:
February 11, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
60
February 12, 2023 - 10:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yeap, the 200gr 44-40, even at High Velocities, will never ever match the 240gr 44 Magnum’s performance out of a handgun…where it was designed. As far as the 44 Magnum in a rifle, it will never match the 44-40’s accuracy out to 300 yards. Neither is really needed but it is what it is. The 44 Magnum handgun is built like a tank but even it needs to be loaded different for rifle performance.

If the shooter loves the 44-40 and wants to make the best out it at different ranges and for different uses…it is very versatile in both rifle and revolver when loaded correctly.

If you could really care less what cartridge you use, and performance is what you want…get a 44 Magnum for revolver use and a 45-70 for carbine use and a 30-06 for longer distances or even a .270 for 300 yards. Sight the .270 in at 50 yards and aim 4″ high at 300 yards, meat on the table.

It takes an abondance of skill to do the same with the 44-40 with all the different loads for all the different options..one of which I am too old to achieve! That’s my excuse! Laugh

 

BTW, the 44-40 revolver used 250gr handloads back in the day (1930’s)…published loads to prove it! Cool

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: rustyjack, cranky2, Ben, Zebulon, MNwin, Cilrah
Guest(s) 138
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6281
TXGunNut: 4970
Chuck: 4571
1873man: 4282
steve004: 4160
Big Larry: 2324
twobit: 2291
TR: 1710
mrcvs: 1706
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12650
Posts: 109998

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1745
Members: 8792
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation