Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 48
Member Since:
May 8, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 13, 2017 - 9:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

      I recently got both of John Campbell’s books about the Single Shot, which brought up a question.     Pages 96 & 97 of Volume I have a long list of chamberings and barrels for the S. S.     I was quite surprised to see that the .38WCF  and .44WCF  had twist rates of 1 -36,  while the .25WCF was 1 – 14 and the .32WCF was 1 – 20.

      Anybody know why the .38 and .44 had such slow twist rates ?     Why weren’t they the same as, or at least closer to, the ’73 and ’92 rifles ?

      Also, anyone have reload suggestions for the .38WCF in the 1885 ?

                  Thanks !

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10836
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
April 14, 2017 - 5:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Not everything you read in Campbell’s 2-volume series is accurate.

Do you have a low-wall rifle, or a high-wall ? The high-wall receiver is quite some bit stouter, and you can load it quite hot if you choose to do so. If you have a low-wall, keep it in the same range as the W.H.V. loads made for the Model 1892.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6368
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4598
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2344
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12759
Posts: 111131

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1766
Members: 8853
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation