<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Bo Rich on Big Bore 94s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/big-bore-94s/#p177853</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/big-bore-94s/#p177853</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The .444 Marlin, and the .450 Marlin were introduced much later.  They feature a cross bolt safety,  or tang style safety.  Pretty sure that the .307, .356, and the .375 were discontinued when the Marlin chamberings were available.  It is just me, but I have no interest in a Winchester Model 94 that has these additional safety features.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 14:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Nevada Paul on Comparing Real Firearms and Paintball Guns: Lessons from Both Worlds</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/comparing-real-firearms-and-paintball-guns-lessons-from-both-worlds/#p177852</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/comparing-real-firearms-and-paintball-guns-lessons-from-both-worlds/#p177852</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>CaseyFields said </strong><br />
Hi everyone,<br />
Collecting and studying Winchester firearms is fascinating and it’s interesting to see how the principles of handling, safety and trigger control translate across different types of guns. In my experience, practicing with paintball guns can actually reinforce some of these fundamentals.<br />
Paintball guns may not fire live rounds, but they still teach grip, stance, aiming and reaction timing, skills that feel surprisingly relevant when handling real firearms responsibly. Even though the purposes differ, there’s a shared appreciation for mechanics, control and precision.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Casey, I don't disagree with what you say about grip, stance, aiming, etc. But I have an inherent aversion to paintball as a sport.</p>
<p>I was taught, and taught all my kids gun safety, which started with 'never swing a muzzle through a person; never point the firearm at a person, etc.'.  That had to be ingrained, along with 'every firearm is loaded, always, until you personally and safely inspect it'.</p>
<p>How can you instill all those safety doctrines when some young person goes to a paintball range and spends the day aiming at people then pulling the trigger.</p>
<p>Just my opinion, but a long standing frustration with me.  I know a lot of responsible hunters and target shooters enjoy and participate in the sport of Paintball, I just was never comfortable with it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>NP</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 13:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>CaseyFields on Comparing Real Firearms and Paintball Guns: Lessons from Both Worlds</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/comparing-real-firearms-and-paintball-guns-lessons-from-both-worlds/#p177851</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/comparing-real-firearms-and-paintball-guns-lessons-from-both-worlds/#p177851</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>Collecting and studying Winchester firearms is fascinating and it’s interesting to see how the principles of handling, safety and trigger control translate across different types of guns. In my experience, practicing with <a href="https://paintballnest.com/paintball-guns/" target="_blank">paintball guns</a> can actually reinforce some of these fundamentals.</p>
<p>Paintball guns may not fire live rounds, but they still teach grip, stance, aiming and reaction timing, skills that feel surprisingly relevant when handling real firearms responsibly. Even though the purposes differ, there’s a shared appreciation for mechanics, control and precision.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 13:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>CaseyFields on ...another 1866 Yellow Boy question...thoughts on rear sight mod </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/another-1866-yellow-boy-question-thoughts-on-rear-sight-mod/#p177850</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/another-1866-yellow-boy-question-thoughts-on-rear-sight-mod/#p177850</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense, the musket sight was likely for better long-range accuracy. The elevator wear fits if it was originally a 22B.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 13:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>steve004 on Winchester 1895,s in .303</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1895s-in-303/#p177849</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1895s-in-303/#p177849</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Eric Coleridge said </strong><br />
I have a copy of the Winchester 1895 book, but not much info on the .303 musket. There is a copy of a catalogue from 1900 that shows the musket was available in .303. The only one I found was advertised on gunsinternational.<br />
1895’s in 303 were popular in Canada, hard to find one in excellent condition as they were well used. Hoping to find a musket in 303, it would be my holy grail!<br />
 <br />
<a href="https://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/rifles/winchester-rifles---model-1895/winchester-95-musket-303-british-.cfm?gun_id=103265576#md-19" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/rifles/winchester-rifles---model-1895/winchester-95-musket-303-british-.cfm?gun_id=103265576#md-19</a><br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Eric - </p>
<p>The gunsinternational listing your show certainly proved they exist.  Did you purchase that one?  I'm sure you would prefer one in better condition.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 13:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jeremy P on ...another 1866 Yellow Boy question...thoughts on rear sight mod </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/another-1866-yellow-boy-question-thoughts-on-rear-sight-mod/#p177846</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/another-1866-yellow-boy-question-thoughts-on-rear-sight-mod/#p177846</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Bob, why though do you think they wanted the musket sight in the first place? It's all conjecture, but what gains would it have gotten...better set up for distance shooting?</p>
<p>You're probably on to something with the elevator wear, hadn't paid attention to that before. Was the original likely a 22B w/ elevator?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 12:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Cowboy103 on The average 1866</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-3/#p177843</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-3/#p177843</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>TR said </strong><br />
  I would look it over, $6600 is cheap, maybe a reason it's cheap. Any damage or repair to the receiver is a deal breaker. T/R<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well he’s got 5 66s there and probably more guns than any shop in Nc, and that’s no joke it’s pretty crazy, but originally he wanted $7500, I left and then called back eh a couple weeks later to talk some more and then he came down after I offered him 6k. But if that’s cheap then I dunno I thought it was a fair price from what I’ve seen them realistically go for and not just the high prices posted. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 03:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>1873man on ...another 1866 Yellow Boy question...thoughts on rear sight mod </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/another-1866-yellow-boy-question-thoughts-on-rear-sight-mod/#p177842</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/another-1866-yellow-boy-question-thoughts-on-rear-sight-mod/#p177842</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The Winchester catalog called it the Musket Rear Sight. The barrel usually had a milled slot that the spring sat in to keep it from sliding out of place. I would guess the rear slot was for the original barrel sight and later they wanted to put on a later Sporting sight that was longer so a new dovetail was added. It looks like I can see wear from the elevator over the slot filler. </p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 02:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jeremy P on ...another 1866 Yellow Boy question...thoughts on rear sight mod </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/another-1866-yellow-boy-question-thoughts-on-rear-sight-mod/#p177841</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/another-1866-yellow-boy-question-thoughts-on-rear-sight-mod/#p177841</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>All, the other recent 1866 thread burning up the forum inspired me to dig out mine and see what everyone thought about the rear sight on it.</p>
<p>See pics. This is gun #105747, purchased from a fellow WACA member a couple of years ago or so.... The current ladder sight is in a dovetail 2-15/16" from the receiver edge to dovetail center. It has no spring tension and just flops around, looks like it's missing the period spring that sits laterally along the barrel from other guns' pics I saw.</p>
<p>The blank filler you see is 1-3/16" forward of the receiver to center of dovetail. The blank looks very well fit and is aged to almost exactly the browned color of the surrounding barrel material.</p>
<p>Thoughts from you sharp-eyed viewers on the theory behind the sight swap (or anything else)? Let the thoughts and observations flow!</p>
<p>View pics here: <a href="https://photos.app.goo.gl/9Pi6qg954JdX3meu7" target="_blank">https://photos.app.goo.gl/HuDNnLrimVvz1ZfU7 </a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 01:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>1873man on The average 1866</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-3/#p177829</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-3/#p177829</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Without good pictures you'll never know whats wrong and whats right.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 21:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>MidwestCrisis on The average 1866</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-3/#p177828</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-3/#p177828</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>TR said </strong><br />
  I would look it over, $6600 is cheap, maybe a reason it's cheap. Any damage or repair to the receiver is a deal breaker. T/R<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>In such a case, what’s its worth?   The sum of the parts? I’m starting to see a correlation between original old guns and original old tractors.  </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 21:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>nascar fan on Big Bore 94s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/big-bore-94s/#p177824</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/big-bore-94s/#p177824</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Wasn't the 444 Marlin one of the big bored?  I have all four in my collection if I recall correctly.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 20:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>TR on The average 1866</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-3/#p177799</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-3/#p177799</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>  I would look it over, $6600 is cheap, maybe a reason it's cheap. Any damage or repair to the receiver is a deal breaker. T/R</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>M64lvr on Big Bore 94s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/big-bore-94s/#p177798</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/big-bore-94s/#p177798</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I tried to find a M94 BB in 356Win for a while around here a number years back, never even came close to one! I find this rifle &#038; cartridge to be as interesting and useful as any the even old Winchester Levers, for my taste &#038; purposes! It along with an 86 in 33wcf and Mid 71 in 348 are just Winchester Levers at their finest IMO! But I detest the Angle Eject Cut, but it wouldn't have stopped me. </p>
<p>I haven't looked for these purposes, but im fairly sure Hawk would have or could make the ideal bullets for either, and probably none better for performance on game!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Eric Coleridge on Winchester 1895,s in .303</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1895s-in-303/#p177795</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1895s-in-303/#p177795</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I have a copy of the Winchester 1895 book, but not much info on the .303 musket. There is a copy of a catalogue from 1900 that shows the musket was available in .303. The only one I found was advertised on gunsinternational.</p>
<p>1895’s in 303 were popular in Canada, hard to find one in excellent condition as they were well used. Hoping to find a musket in 303, it would be my holy grail!</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="https://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/rifles/winchester-rifles---model-1895/winchester-95-musket-303-british-.cfm?gun_id=103265576#md-19" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/rifles/winchester-rifles---model-1895/winchester-95-musket-303-british-.cfm?gun_id=103265576#md-19</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 14:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
