<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Chuck on Hotchkiss Muskets</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/hotchkiss-muskets/#p185217</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/hotchkiss-muskets/#p185217</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>TXGunNut said </strong><br />
I seem to recall 45 caliber was sometimes expressed as 45/100 as in 45 100ths of an inch. For me in a military rifle of that era that would mean 45-70 or 45 Guvmint. <br />
 <br />
Mike<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mike, I think this is the best explanation. The 100 has nothing to do with the powder charge.  It is the fraction for a 45 cal bullet. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 16:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>quack1 on 94 deluxe on GB</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/94-deluxe-on-gb/#p185216</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/94-deluxe-on-gb/#p185216</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe just the angle between the camera and gun, but to me, the profile photos of the butt plate show an extreme amount of negative pitch.  I find it hard to believe that would be factory done.  There would be quite a bit of upward muzzle flip from the recoil of each shot.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 16:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bo Rich on 1955 Model 70 30-06 Standard Low Comb</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1955-model-70-30-06-standard-low-comb/#p185215</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1955-model-70-30-06-standard-low-comb/#p185215</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Louis,  This is a funny story!  When I bought my first Super Grade in 1992 I measured the Front Redfield site.  All the SuperGrades I bought after that had the same Redfield site.   So, naturally I thought that they were the same type.  I double checked them, because I wanted you to have accurate information for your book.  Well, I must of measured the site wrong in 1992, and since then I never thought to measure them afterwards.  Yes,  they all are the Redfield 255 Gold Front sites!  </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 13:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Dave M. on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185209</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185209</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the education guys, much appreciated.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185208</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185208</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Csterling1966 said </strong><br />
Or should I say 32 Winchester Special ?<br />
Chris<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>That would be correct.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 06:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Chuck on Hotchkiss Muskets</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/hotchkiss-muskets/#p185207</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/hotchkiss-muskets/#p185207</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
<strong>TXGunNut said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
As far as the rifle or carbine is concerned the chambering is probably best described as 45-70 or as I prefer 45 Guvmint. Like you I find the variations of a few of the 45 (and 50) caliber cartridges fascinating and confusing when two or more cartridges share very similar overall dimensions or may be chambered in the same rifle. I believe a similar practice was used with the Trapdoor. The confusion continues when modern weapons in 45-70 (and 45 Colt comes to mind) will safely chamber cartridges capable of pressures and velocities likely not imagined 153 years ago. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I was disappointed to discover during a recent safe dive a Hotchkiss has yet to follow me home. Perhaps I may need to be more proactive in this area.<br />
 <br />
Mike<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I recently bought my first Springfields.  One is a beautiful trapdoor rifle from 1878 and the other is a Military 22 training rifle used during WW II.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 03:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Csterling1966 on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185204</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185204</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Or should I say 32 Winchester Special ?</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 03:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Csterling1966 on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185201</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185201</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you guys , his is in 32 WCF</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 02:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185198</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185198</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Csterling1966 said </strong><br />
So does that add any more value if they have that x after the serial number , my cousin has this model 94 with one ?<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>No it does not, especially for a Model 94.  Currently, I have (75) "X" marked Model 94s in my survey.</p>
<p>Which caliber is your cousin's Model 94?</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 02:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>JWA on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185197</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185197</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I would pay a significant premium for the pair (or triplets) of the original number + the ones with the "X"s.....just sayin.  <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Laugh" alt="Laugh" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" /></p>
<p>But standalone with an "X" is no premium for me.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Csterling1966 on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185196</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185196</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Okay thanks Ted .</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 01:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Tedk on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185195</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185195</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>IMHO minimal, if any, added value</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 01:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Csterling1966 on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185194</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185194</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>So does that add any more value if they have that x after the serial number , my cousin has this model 94 with one ?<img data-upload="1" data-width="1080" data-height="2400" title="Screenshot_20261006-213113.Moto-App-Launcher.png" alt="Screenshot_20261006-213113.Moto-App-Launcher.png" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/csterling1966/2026/10/Screenshot_20261006-213113.Moto-App-Launcher.png" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 01:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on X after a serial number?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185187</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/x-after-a-serial-number/#p185187</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Louis Luttrell said </strong><br />
Hi Bert-<br />
I know we've touched base on this before, but in your surveys do you have any/many Winchesters (any Model) with the "X" suffix denoting a duplicate fro before WWII?  Not to say that Winchester never had accidental s/n duplications earlier, just asking about how they denoted them...<br />
Reason I ask is that in the M70 survey, I now have (5) with a "D" prefix, ALL between s/n D8690 and D8740.  I have others in that range that lack the prefix but (so far) have not seen the same s/n +/- the "D" which would suggest that the prefix was a pre-war way of denoting "duplicate"...<br />
Thhanks,<br />
Lou<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Lou,</p>
<p>I do indeed have a very small number of Pre-WW II "X" suffixed Winchesters in my surveys.  The earliest is a Model 94 s/n 1261417X (PR date January 10, 1941).  It also has the "<strong>W</strong>" stamp indicating the Du-light Bluing test.</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="434" data-height="842" title="1261417X-W.jpg" alt="1261417X-W.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/bert-h/2026/10/1261417X-W.jpg" /></p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 23:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>TXGunNut on Hotchkiss Muskets</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/hotchkiss-muskets/#p185185</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/hotchkiss-muskets/#p185185</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
<strong>Chuck said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
TXGunNut said<br />
I seem to recall 45 caliber was sometimes expressed as 45/100 as in 45 100ths of an inch. For me in a military rifle of that era that would mean 45-70 or 45 Guvmint. <br />
 <br />
Mike<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mike, you're correct and that may be what was meant?  I have a 2nd Model Military carbine and a 3rd Model Military rifle and each are 45 Cal.  But the carbine should be shot with the 45-55 load.  The Military found the 70 grs to be too much.  The other thing is that the 1st and 2nd Model Military carbines are a joint effort between Winchester and the Springfield Armory.  The 3rd Model Military rifle is all Winchester parts. <br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Chuck-</p>
<p>As far as the rifle or carbine is concerned the chambering is probably best described as 45-70 or as I prefer 45 Guvmint. Like you I find the variations of a few of the 45 (and 50) caliber cartridges fascinating and confusing when two or more cartridges share very similar overall dimensions or may be chambered in the same rifle. I believe a similar practice was used with the Trapdoor. The confusion continues when modern weapons in 45-70 (and 45 Colt comes to mind) will safely chamber cartridges capable of pressures and velocities likely not imagined 153 years ago. </p>
<p>I was disappointed to discover during a recent safe dive a Hotchkiss has yet to follow me home. Perhaps I may need to be more proactive in this area.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
