<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>TXGunNut on But they NEVER made them that way.  24 Inch SRC's!!!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180186</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180186</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Your patience and dedication has paid off again, Michael. If it wasn't for the ledger entries most of us would have never considered the possibility of factory engraving. The story behind this order could be very interesting. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 14:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>twobit on But they NEVER made them that way.  24 Inch SRC's!!!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180179</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180179</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>tsbccut said </strong><br />
Michael,<br />
Echoing Steve's post, this is fascinating information. Your work, along with the others working on various models, is greatly appreciated.<br />
Tom<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks Tom.  This one is especially interesting to work on.  The variation in the usage of the barrel address styles does make me scratch my head at times.  When I look at the Model 1892's these stamp styles change numerous times and not always consistently across the various configurations.  Consistency was not a hallmark within the Winchester manufacturing process.  </p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 12:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>tsbccut on But they NEVER made them that way.  24 Inch SRC's!!!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180177</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180177</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Echoing Steve's post, this is fascinating information. Your work, along with the others working on various models, is greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 11:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Steven Gabrielli on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180176</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180176</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Oy. You even have 45-70s stored in the stock, and you stated they fit?? </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 11:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Commissioner on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180173</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180173</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Zebulon said </strong><br />
From what I can see of the receiver, it appears to have been a high grade, engraved and probably French gray receiver that has been refinished to a matte blue. The engraving seems have been rendered less distinct by polishing. <br />
French gray receivers with engraving and gold overlays were a common feature of Grade 2 or High Grade Miroku Brownings and Winchesters. Tang safeties were not installed on the Brownng branded rifles so the base receiver is almost certainly a Winchester branded one. <br />
If you would, I would like to see a complete list of all the marks, by location. <br />
Unless shown evidence to the contrary, I believe this is a non-factory hybrid modified gun. <br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I need to apologize: The weapon is a 30/06 not a 45/70. Here are all the markings on the weapon. On the right side under the real sight it says “ Winchester” under Winchester it says. License. Under license it says. US Repeating Arms Co USA. Under that it says Made in Japan. On top,in front of the receiver it says 30/06 cal. Under the rear sight on the left side it says It says Especially made for Smokeless Powder, under that is says Special Steel Barrel. On the right side of the receiver to the rear it says NF 1320.  My 45/70 is a model 1886. Sorry. I am glad. I did not try to shoot it?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>steve004 on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180171</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180171</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm dumbstruck.  When I first read the original post, I assumed it was a simple matter of the original poster making an error in listing the model number and it was in fact a Model 1886.  Looking at the photo, that surely is not a Model 1886 and indeed appears a Model 1895.  </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on Winchester 88 "Last Five"? 1993 Parts Cleanup Rifle</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-88-last-five-1993-parts-cleanup-rifle/#p180168</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-88-last-five-1993-parts-cleanup-rifle/#p180168</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>My references indicate that the last Model 88 serial number (in the year 1973) was 283718, or (310) after your Model 88.  </p>
<p>I am extremely doubtful that the U.S. Repeating Arms Company (USRACo) would have assembled any Model 88 rifles after they purchased the New Haven factory from Olin (Winchester) in December of 1980.  Any Model 88 parts clean-up assembly would have taken place in the immediate years after regular production was ceased in late 1973, certainly no later than early 1980.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 22:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180164</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180164</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>From what I can see of the receiver, it appears to have been a high grade, engraved and probably French gray receiver that has been refinished to a matte blue. The engraving seems have been rendered less distinct by polishing. </p>
<p>French gray receivers with engraving and gold overlays were a common feature of Grade 2 or High Grade Miroku Brownings and Winchesters. Tang safeties were not installed on the Brownng branded rifles so the base receiver is almost certainly a Winchester branded one. </p>
<p>If you would, I would like to see a complete list of all the marks, by location. </p>
<p>Unless shown evidence to the contrary, I believe this is a non-factory hybrid modified gun. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 22:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>alex_camarillotraders on Winchester 88 "Last Five"? 1993 Parts Cleanup Rifle</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-88-last-five-1993-parts-cleanup-rifle/#p180163</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-88-last-five-1993-parts-cleanup-rifle/#p180163</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, trying to research a model 88, serial number H283408, which supposedly was assembled in 1993 as the last of the "parts clean up" rifles, 20-years after the M88 was discontinued.   Trying to research it but overall finding it a bit confusing.  The one solid fact that I've been able to determine is that receiver number seems to have been assigned at the tail end of production, in 1973. Some source material makes vague references to parts cleanup numbers, but certainly nothing definitive. Hoping someone on here might be able to shed some light on the subject? [Image Can Not Be Found]<img src="https://camarillotraders.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/photos/DSC_0741_1000.jpg" width="1000" alt="" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180162</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180162</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Customer Service at WinchesterGuns.com should be able to help you. </p>
<p>FN Herstal has never catalogued a Model 1895 chambered for the 45-70 cartridge, whether branded as a Browning or Winchester product. </p>
<p>The photo showing a blued, engraved receiver is unusual, as well. </p>
<p>Could you measure and report the exact barrel.length with a cleaning rod from bolt face to muzzle? </p>
<p>Would you mind to post a closeup image of the barrel rollmark of the caliber. </p>
<p>The tang safety and "special steel" rollmark are consistent with Miroku built, Winchester branded rifles sold by FNH through its Browning Arms Company subsidiary, d/b/a Winchester Repeating Arms. </p>
<p>The odds strongly favor this being a one-off modified gun. If the caliber designation on the barrel has been altered, i would guess a .405 WCF barrel has been rebored to .458, assuming that is possible, and the barrel threads set back to allow rechambering to the shorter cartridge. A non-standard barrel length would be evidence of this. </p>
<p>Alternatively, MIroku has made round tapered 45-70 barrels for Model 1886 rifles, from time to time. Could this rifle have been rebarreled with one of those? </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 21:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Commissioner on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180153</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180153</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The bullets fit just fine.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 18:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Commissioner on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180152</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180152</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>It must be the “Special Steel”?<img data-upload="1" data-width="3264" data-height="2448" title="IMG_3104.jpeg" alt="IMG_3104.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/commissioner/2026/06/IMG_3104.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="3264" data-height="2448" title="IMG_3105.jpeg" alt="IMG_3105.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/commissioner/2026/06/IMG_3105.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="3264" data-height="2448" title="IMG_3106.jpeg" alt="IMG_3106.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/commissioner/2026/06/IMG_3106.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="3264" data-height="2448" title="IMG_3107.jpeg" alt="IMG_3107.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/commissioner/2026/06/IMG_3107.jpeg" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>twobit on Model 1892 Trapper - Value based on caliber??</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-1892-trapper-value-based-on-caliber/#p180151</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-1892-trapper-value-based-on-caliber/#p180151</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>THREEDFLYER said </strong><br />
Michael, <br />
I just sent you a PM with the serial number......feel free to post any info you might dig up on this thread.<br />
Thanks for the help!<br />
Tom<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks Tom.</p>
<p>I had not previously seen that specific rifle.  I added it into my spreadsheet and it is in a small group of other short barrel carbines in either 25-20 or 32 WCF caliber.  SN 859920 was sold at RIA back in May of 2023 as Lot 42 for $11,163.  <a href="https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/88/42/atf-exempted-winchester-model-1892-trappers-carbine" target="_blank">https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/88/42/atf-exempted-winchester-model-1892-trappers-carbine</a></p>
<p>SN 859943 was sold at RIA in August of 2024 as Lot 3032 for $12,925.  <a href="https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/4092/3032/winchester-model-1892-saddle-ring-trappers-carbine" target="_blank">https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/4092/3032/winchester-model-1892-saddle-ring-trappers-carbine</a></p>
<p>That should help give you some ballpark numbers baring the fact that yours is in significantly poorer condition.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="2126" data-height="436" title="Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-1.48.39 PM.png" alt="Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-1.48.39 PM.png" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/twobit/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-1.48.39 PM.png" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>tim tomlinson on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180150</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180150</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Commissioner--That is MOST interesting!  Being 'Made in Japan' makes it a different animal than the original 1895's but still most interesting.  Why?  Because the listings of originals includes a couple supposedly made in that caliber.  The distance between the sidewalls of the receiver are too narrow for a .45-70 rim to fit, let alone to fit into the box magazine.  If Winchester made any back in the day, the receiver would necessitate a greater width to accomodate the caliber.   To my knowledge, none of the originals annotated in unusual, non-standard calibers have shown up.  I would surely like to see how Miroku (assuming they were the Japanese source of yours) accomplished the chambering.  Please follow up on this as it may fill in a few more blanks.  Tim</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>steve004 on But they NEVER made them that way.  24 Inch SRC's!!!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/#p180149</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/#p180149</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Michael - fascinating information.  Thanks (a huge amount) for sharing. </p>
<p>But:</p>
<p><strong>Now for the bad news.  The barrel has subsequently been cut down to 20 inches and a rifle style front sight installed in a dovetail!  AAARGH</strong></p>
<p>That is some seriously bad news!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
