IsaiahMN said

Bert H. said
Quite frankly, I do not recommend purchasing that rifle.  It is a cobbled together "Frankenchester".
It appears that the forend tenon has been soldered in place by the "Bubba" who rebuilt it.  The bedding in the forend stock was added by "Bubba", so No, it is not normal.
To remove the magazine band, the first step is to drive the transverse pin out (left to right with the muzzle pointed downrange).  Ordinarily, with the pin removed, it would allow the magazine tube to be pulled forward (through the band and forend cap) until it clears both.  However, it appears that the tube has been soldered to the tenon and barrel. If that is the case, it will not be possible to remove the mag tube.
Bert
  

Thank you for the reply, I think what you are seeing that looks like solder is actually a layer of plastic that is part of the bedding, in your opinion in its current state is the wood forend able to be removed? 
I can pick this rifle up for $400 out the door, I’ve never seen such an early example receiver, I don’t plan to shoot it much if at all. More wanted it for a wall hanger conversation piece. Do you feel it’s still a bad call at the price? Please be blunt. Haha
  

If it is bedding material (not solder), and you can remove it, the magazine tube should slide forward and out of the mag ring which will allow the forend stock to be removed.

As for the price... I personally would be hard pressed to pay more than $200 for it.

Bert

Bert H. said
Quite frankly, I do not recommend purchasing that rifle.  It is a cobbled together "Frankenchester".
It appears that the forend tenon has been soldered in place by the "Bubba" who rebuilt it.  The bedding in the forend stock was added by "Bubba", so No, it is not normal.
To remove the magazine band, the first step is to drive the transverse pin out (left to right with the muzzle pointed downrange).  Ordinarily, with the pin removed, it would allow the magazine tube to be pulled forward (through the band and forend cap) until it clears both.  However, it appears that the tube has been soldered to the tenon and barrel. If that is the case, it will not be possible to remove the mag tube.
Bert
  

Thank you for the reply, I think what you are seeing that looks like solder is actually a layer of plastic that is part of the bedding, in your opinion in its current state is the wood forend able to be removed? 

I can pick this rifle up for $400 out the door, I’ve never seen such an early example receiver, I don’t plan to shoot it much if at all. More wanted it for a wall hanger conversation piece. Do you feel it’s still a bad call at the price? Please be blunt. Haha

It appears that the forend tenon has been soldered in place by the "Bubba" who rebuilt it.  The bedding in the forend stock was added by "Bubba", so No, it is not normal.

To remove the magazine band, the first step is to drive the transverse pin out (left to right with the muzzle pointed downrange).  Ordinarily, with the pin removed, it would allow the magazine tube to be pulled forward (through the band and forend cap) until it clears both.  However, it appears that the tube has been soldered to the tenon and barrel. If that is the case, it will not be possible to remove the mag tube.

Bert

Excited to be a new member! About to pick up my first ever Winchester rifle!

I am looking at purchasing a model 94 from 1895 (serial in 26,000) range. Though it has a model 64 barrel and forend. It appears the forend has some sort of bedding done (is this normal?) and I’d like to remove the forend but there is this dovetail like piece under the forend cap between the barrel and magazine tube that I cannot seem to figure out how to remove. Also curious how to remove the front magazine tube band that dovetails into the barrel just before the magazine cap. I would love any input or resources on disassembly of this area.

Thank you!!

PHOTOS BELOW

https://photobucket.com/share/d0941a6b-61fe-40d1-8d8d-2b8cb92ec081

This one's in the 32,000 range, but the shot gun but would be a better choice to shoot! IMO!

Tony

MidwestCrisis said

Edward Southgate said
Just as a shooter and hunting gun , the '95 with the Lyman sight would be interesting to me . If that's an original Lyman 21 rather than a Providence Tool reproduction , it's worth considerable . 
  

I see those sights sell for a lot.  That’s why guys like me buy guns with holes in them at these auctions.  This thread previously ended with a bunch of pictures of beautiful guns. I’m sorry to bring attention to the lot for someone who thought they’d get a deal.  Hopefully the sight question will be answered when one of the experts chime in.  I brought this up because this was a rifle I might have paid too much for when I started buying old Winchesters.  
  

The serial number is early enough to get a CFM research sheet for it... which what I recommend.

The Lyman No. 21 receiver sight appears to have been on that rifle for a very long time, and if not factory installed, it is certainly a period installed sight. 

Due to the overall "well worn" graded condition, it primarily is a shooter grade rifle, and as such, the Lyman No. 21 is an added bonus regardless of who or when it was installed.

Bert

Edward Southgate said
Just as a shooter and hunting gun , the '95 with the Lyman sight would be interesting to me . If that's an original Lyman 21 rather than a Providence Tool reproduction , it's worth considerable . 
  

I see those sights sell for a lot.  That’s why guys like me buy guns with holes in them at these auctions.  This thread previously ended with a bunch of pictures of beautiful guns. I’m sorry to bring attention to the lot for someone who thought they’d get a deal.  Hopefully the sight question will be answered when one of the experts chime in.  I brought this up because this was a rifle I might have paid too much for when I started buying old Winchesters.  

https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/5033/29/winchester-model-1895-lever-action-rifle

thanks,

Adam

Michael