<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on Model 94 butt stock to metal gap.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-94-butt-stock-to-metal-gap/#p186410</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-94-butt-stock-to-metal-gap/#p186410</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The stocks are not original to gun.  Somebody installed the poorly fitting wood on it after they had it engraved and refinished.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 02:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Robo3d on Model 94 butt stock to metal gap.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-94-butt-stock-to-metal-gap/#p186409</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-94-butt-stock-to-metal-gap/#p186409</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Good evening all. I am a new member and I am wandering what your thoughts are on the gap between my butt stock and receiver. It is about .015" on sides and up tight on upper and lower tangs. The fore end is also up tight.<img data-upload="1" data-width="3024" data-height="2268" title="IMG_2603-1.jpeg" alt="IMG_2603-1.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/robo3d/2026/11/IMG_2603-1.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="3024" data-height="2268" title="IMG_2601-1.jpeg" alt="IMG_2601-1.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/robo3d/2026/11/IMG_2601-1.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="3024" data-height="2268" title="IMG_2600-1.jpeg" alt="IMG_2600-1.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/robo3d/2026/11/IMG_2600-1.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="3024" data-height="2268" title="IMG_2599-1.jpeg" alt="IMG_2599-1.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/robo3d/2026/11/IMG_2599-1.jpeg" /> </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 01:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on Question on Cody Letters and Browning Brothers Shipments</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186407</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186407</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>BillWyo said </strong><br />
Bert, I'm so glad you answered my post. I have been reading your posts for a long time, you do a wonderful job. I thought for a real 1885 at the very low price I paid there was a problem. In fact I have been wanting a 1885 in 45-70 for years and could never come up with the $$$$. I will have a 40-70 Browning Brothers 28" barrel to sell in a few weeks. Your information was a great help. I'm very happy. Thanks; Bill<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I have identified at least six different Single Shot order numbers that were shipped to the Browning Bothers as patent payment rifles.  I am still attempting to determine exactly how many Single Shot rifles were shipped to Ogden.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 01:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>BillWyo on Question on Cody Letters and Browning Brothers Shipments</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186405</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186405</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Bert, I'm so glad you answered my post. I have been reading your posts for a long time, you do a wonderful job. I thought for a real 1885 at the very low price I paid there was a problem. In fact I have been wanting a 1885 in 45-70 for years and could never come up with the $$$$. I will have a 40-70 Browning Brothers 28" barrel to sell in a few weeks. Your information was a great help. I'm very happy. Thanks; Bill</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 01:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony #5411 on Question on Cody Letters and Browning Brothers Shipments</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186402</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186402</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>You can take Bert's well surveyed and documented information to the Bank! I have and he hasn't proven me wrong yet, and I know he won't!<img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Smile" alt="Smile" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" /></p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 00:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on Question on Cody Letters and Browning Brothers Shipments</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186399</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186399</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Some might say that I may know a bit about the Winchester Single Shot (a.k.a. Model 1885) rifles.</p>
<p>To start this off, s/n 22154 was not manufactured and shipped as a 40-70 S.S.  As originally manufactured, it was a 45-70 with a 32-inch No. 3 octagon barrel.  It was not ever returned for an R &#038; R, which indicates that it was not rebarreled by Winchester.</p>
<p>In answer to your question about shipping destinations, it is extremely rare to find a record with that information.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 23:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>BillWyo on Question on Cody Letters and Browning Brothers Shipments</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186392</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/question-on-cody-letters-and-browning-brothers-shipments/#p186392</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I recently purchased an 1888 Winchester Model 1885 High Wall in .40-70 SS and am considering ordering a Cody factory letter once I have the rifle in hand and can verify the serial number 22154 and markings.<br />
My primary interest is whether surviving records from this period sometimes identify the original shipping destination, dealer, or consignee.<br />
This rifle is reported to have a "Browning Brothers, Ogden UT" barrel stamp, which naturally raises the question of whether a Cody letter might document shipment to Browning Brothers in Ogden, Utah.<br />
For members who have ordered Cody letters on 1880s High Walls:<br />
• How often do the surviving records include the original shipping destination or dealer?<br />
• Have any of you seen letters documenting shipment to Browning Brothers of Ogden UT?<br />
• If so, what information was provided in the letter?<br />
I realize customer information is not always available in Winchester records, but I would appreciate hearing from collectors with firsthand experience on High Walls of this era.<br />
Thanks in advance for any insights.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 21:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>george@georgeamlott.com on Winchester 94 RIFLES . . . .</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-94-rifles/#p186377</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-94-rifles/#p186377</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Burt Humphrey said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>Bert H. said<br />
The Model 94 Sporting Rifle was officially discontinued as of the January 1938 Catalog.  The last actual "Rifle " that I have verified is serial number 1663507 (assembled in 1952).  Production was nearly non-existant as of 1933 (coincident with the introduction of the Model 64).<br />
Bert<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>And don't forget about my favorite of the 94 family, the Model 55, produced from 1924 to 1932 and only rifles. From the top, Model 1894 in 32-40 , Model 55 in 30wcf and Model 64 in 219Zipper.</p>
<p>  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Burt..........You have an AMAZING collection! I love seeing your photos...........</p>
<p>George......</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 19:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Chuck on Winchester 94 RIFLES . . . .</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-94-rifles/#p186373</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-94-rifles/#p186373</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>TXGunNut said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>Burt Humphrey said </p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is why we can't have eye candy competitions around here. Burt would win every one of them!<br />
 <br />
Mike<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mike, you got that right!!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 19:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Chuck on 95 Barrel questions. </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/95-barrel-questions/#p186372</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/95-barrel-questions/#p186372</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Brad, thanks for all the good info.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 19:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Brad Dunbar on 95 Barrel questions. </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/95-barrel-questions/#p186359</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/95-barrel-questions/#p186359</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I don’t agree that VP always meant Violent Proof.  This is at least my best understanding and opinion on it.  To start, here are a few examples that do support that meaning, apparently and specifically on shotgun barrels:</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="1663" data-height="1061" title="MS20.23.16.jpg" alt="MS20.23.16.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/MS20.23.16.jpg" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="1562" data-height="1913" title="HPDow-VP.ds_.jpg" alt="HPDow-VP.ds_.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/HPDow-VP.ds_.jpg" /></p>
<p>However, it appeared to both Dan Shuey and I that it must have had more than one meaning, or its definition changed.  I worked with Dan at length on magazine articles and in the Model 1895 book on this subject.  I was going to write out a longer post with more photos, but that can all be seen and read in the book and also in the Summer 2018 magazine.  Photos in the book and article will especially pertain to VP being marked on the underside of a Model 1895 rifle barrel.  Here is an example of VP meaning something other than Violent Proof.  Provisional Proof involved a heavy load of powder and slug in an unfinished barrel.  The VP definition is at the bottom of the document:</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="1662" data-height="2645" title="19050928-Provisional-Proof-Chart.jpg" alt="19050928-Provisional-Proof-Chart.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/19050928-Provisional-Proof-Chart.jpg" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="1310" data-height="858" title="Dan-Shuey-Barrel-Proof-House-interior.jpg" alt="Dan-Shuey-Barrel-Proof-House-interior.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/Dan-Shuey-Barrel-Proof-House-interior.jpg" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="1836" data-height="2399" title="165-WW-374A-020.jpg" alt="165-WW-374A-020.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/165-WW-374A-020.jpg" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Note that in some examples, the VP appears to have been applied prior to finishing or additional stamping:</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="851" data-height="852" title="VP-070283-3.jpg" alt="VP-070283-3.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/VP-070283-3.jpg" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="605" data-height="599" title="VP-418135-405TD-2.jpg" alt="VP-418135-405TD-2.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/VP-418135-405TD-2.jpg" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="1134" data-height="972" title="VP-DSCN4475.jpg" alt="VP-DSCN4475.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/VP-DSCN4475.jpg" /></p>
<p>And then Violent Proof, as mentioned here:</p>
<p><em>Merton A. Robinson, long-time Ballistician and cartridge designer at the WRACo, wrote the following in a 1948 letter to Edwin Pugsley, along with C.S. Comeaux, Secretary of SAAMI:</em></p>
<p><em>“...As a matter of interest, there is also attached one (1) label headed “Violent Proof” for the M/73.  This represents our first loading of Violent Proof loads, the name of which was eventually changed to Definitive Proof.”</em></p>
<p>These are Violent and Definitive Proof cartridge box labels.  These cartridges were intended to be fired in a finished, complete rifle, not an unfinished barrel, and passing the proof would eventually (1905?) result in the Winchester Definitive Proof mark being applied.  I also have one surviving ledger of "Violent Proof" cartridge loads.  Like factory Standard Cartridge loads, full factory boxes still exist.</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="891" data-height="777" title="VP-label-73-DP95b.jpg" alt="VP-label-73-DP95b.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/VP-label-73-DP95b.jpg" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="921" data-height="625" title="VP-Label-DP95a.jpg" alt="VP-Label-DP95a.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/VP-Label-DP95a.jpg" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="910" data-height="621" title="Label-DP95.jpg" alt="Label-DP95.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/brad-dunbar/2026/11/Label-DP95.jpg" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 15:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>oldcrankyyankee on 94s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/94s/#p186356</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/94s/#p186356</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>TXGunNut said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>.oldcrankyyankee said<br />
Middle one looks like a post 64 "trapper". <br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yep, betting that's the 45 Colt. That's one post '64 that seems to be getting traction among some collectors. I got decent money for a Trapper awhile back when I sold off most of my post-64's. I like the wood on the one above it.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
Mike<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes they seem quite pricey now.  I bought one for my son a couple years ago in 44 mag and wasn't cheap!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 09:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>dimrod on Winchester 94 RIFLES . . . .</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-94-rifles/#p186354</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-94-rifles/#p186354</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Burt Humphrey said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>Bert H. said<br />
The Model 94 Sporting Rifle was officially discontinued as of the January 1938 Catalog.  The last actual "Rifle " that I have verified is serial number 1663507 (assembled in 1952).  Production was nearly non-existant as of 1933 (coincident with the introduction of the Model 64).<br />
Bert<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>And don't forget about my favorite of the 94 family, the Model 55, produced from 1924 to 1932 and only rifles. From the top, Model 1894 in 32-40 , Model 55 in 30wcf and Model 64 in 219Zipper.</p>
<p>  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for sharing photos of your outstanding rifles, Burt. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 05:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Hotchkiss10 on 94s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/94s/#p186350</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/94s/#p186350</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The middle one is the 45LC, I dont think it’s ever been shot. They would have to supply the sheep herders a rifle, seems like most of them had 25-20s and 25-35 and 30wcf.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 02:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>MidwestCrisis on 95 Barrel questions. </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/95-barrel-questions/#p186348</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/95-barrel-questions/#p186348</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
<strong>TXGunNut said </strong><br />
I was trying to make the first number "82" but "22" certainly makes more sense as a barrel date!<br />
Mike<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I thought 32.  But you can barely see the same odd line on the rear 2 just lighter. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 01:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
