Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles

Buckums on M70 Stock Recommendations and Opinions Needed

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:55:35 +0000

Thanks all for the replies. I will keep my eyes peeled for a replacement stock. In the meantime, I'm going to run her like she is. I cleaned up the stock with some elbow grease and renaissance wax, put on an older gloss 3x9 Leupold I had laying around. The cheek weld attained with this MC stock and the rings / Redfield base it came with is really almost ideal. Surprisingly, the MC stock on this ol gal is actually starting to grow on me.

TXGunNut on 1864 New Haven Arms Henry Rifle, Serial No. 7516 — Seeking Collector Input

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:40:47 +0000

Good call, seems provenance appeals to some buyers.

Mike

Brodg88 on 1864 New Haven Arms Henry Rifle, Serial No. 7516 — Seeking Collector Input

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:16:15 +0000

Ok here's the Update,

1. Tony, I tend to agree with you, $100 seems like small potatoes for a cool history project regardless of the outcome!

2. I have inspected my stock VERY closely with a jeweler's loupe and I can't see any kind of imprint or marking.

3. Anyone else have any thoughts on the Ampersand (& symbol) on the lower tang?

4. Cleaning Rod photo attached

5. NRA view of "Condition/quality": https://www.nramuseum.org/gun-info-research/evaluating-firearms-condition.aspx Do any of you have any opinions where this might fall on this NRA scale?

Anthony on 1864 New Haven Arms Henry Rifle, Serial No. 7516 — Seeking Collector Input

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:54:27 +0000

Vonnie Zullo responded to my request and indicated that the serial number I gave her is listed with the stamps on them but no other information, as Marty acquired for his, but several other all around the serial number, had verified information and we're dedicated to some one. No listed person issued to the one I have. It's not listed in Wiley Swords, 2002 book, as she's found a few that weren't listed in his book, in the past.

For $100.00 she will research the Regimental books, and a copy of the ordinance pages listing records listed.

I'm thinking it's worth a shot!

Tony

Rick C on 1894 Delux… I think..

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:03:10 +0000

No, if you already checked with them like you said and they advised they shared all the data, you can pretty much take that to the bank. The original rear sight was most likely switched to a 3 leaf express when the receiver sight was added.

Dell on 1894 Delux… I think..

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:56:24 +0000

Rick C said
Dell, it’s not often they make a mistake, but on the rare occasion, something gets missed. If they had the info, Jesi And the crew would definitely advise you. They have nothing to gain, and they are well aware of the importance of the letter information.

I agree, I’ve had quite a few letters I have ordered from Cody and they’ve been pretty much right on the money. It does seem odd though that the letter would miss things like the three leaf Winchester express site… as I think this would be an optional add from the factory. Would you suggest I go back to Cody and ask them to double check?

Rick C on 1894 Delux… I think..

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:39:54 +0000

Dell, it’s not often they make a mistake, but on the rare occasion, something gets missed. If they had the info, Jesi And the crew would definitely advise you. They have nothing to gain, and they are well aware of the importance of the letter information.

Dell on 1894 Delux… I think..

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:17:30 +0000

Anthony said
Dell,
As others have said, it's a very nice rifle with an exceptional and well liked configuration. We appreciate you returning and sharing with us, as members have said it's truly a prize!
Any time one like this is seen at a gun show or even at Auction, many might suggest or assume it was sent back and the receiver sight was added then.
These are getting harder to come by and sought after and many of us would be proud to own it!

agreed and thanks for your thought. I did check back with Cody, but the only feedback I got was the shared all the data they had already. Maybe they didn’t wanna go back and check or maybe they don’t have the data. Not sure

Anthony on Winchester 94 Carbine N.Y. Militia Marked

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:03:37 +0000

Clark,

Thanks for the auction listing with the pics and description.

Chris,

Thank you for noticing and posting what you're seeing, as it's the reason I have some doubts, until further research is done, if possible, and verified.

Tony

Anthony on 1894 Delux… I think..

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:45:30 +0000

Dell,

As others have said, it's a very nice rifle with an exceptional and well liked configuration. We appreciate you returning and sharing with us, as members have said it's truly a prize!

Any time one like this is seen at a gun show or even at Auction, many might suggest or assume it was sent back and the receiver sight was added then.

These are getting harder to come by and sought after and many of us would be proud to own it!

Tony

Rick C on 1894 Delux… I think..

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:36:42 +0000

Dell said
https://photos.app.goo.gl/P2f2PV959dCMgSk18

Hey y’all I know I’m a little bit late, but I thought I would post the letter I received back from Winchester on this 1894. I would really appreciate any feedback you may have on this.

I remember this thread now back in 2024. No mention of the Lyman 21 receiver sight in the letter but still a very nice rifle. I’m not sure if the repair and return could be related to the addition of the receiver sight? You might want to double check with Cody on the features. Thanks for remembering us.

Dell on 1894 Delux… I think..

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 02:40:41 +0000

https://photos.app.goo.gl/P2f2PV959dCMgSk18

Hey y’all I know I’m a little bit late, but I thought I would post the letter I received back from Winchester on this 1894. I would really appreciate any feedback you may have on this.

Bill Hanzel on 1894 short rifle

Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:56:31 +0000

Very reasonable! If it was/is letterable ,that’s where a Cody museum membership pays for itself…. Email Jessi and see if it matches… or it it’s a ‘custom’ job

Chris D on Winchester 94 Carbine N.Y. Militia Marked

Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:40:00 +0000

A very interesting SRC.

The butt plate has been replaced or removed recently - likely after the top of the stock was damaged. You can see the damage. The gaps and screws tell me that. If genuine, the butt plate may have also had markings on it but that is speculation.

Rick C on Learning exercise: Winchester Model 1894 Rifle in .38-55 with compelling features

Mon, 20 Jul 2026 21:13:43 +0000

Well, if there’s one thing I’ve learned from WACA and this forum over the years, is the value of a Cody letter. I’m still not convinced on the difference in the barrel and receiver contrast mentioned before, and even more now with a special order feature not mentioned in the Cody info. Could’ve been missed back in the day but, could’ve should’ve would’ve is just a story to most collectors, other than the seller. I guess the buyer will have to make the decision if it’s correct or not.