<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>426crown on Winchester 1886 matted barrel's</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1886-matted-barrels/#p180218</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1886-matted-barrels/#p180218</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>According to Chatgpt  there were 206 in the model 1886.  There were 10 in 50-100-450. 2 were matted in 36" 1886 50-100-450.  Others will chime in, but ledger space may have been an issue--Bill</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 23:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>antler1 on Winchester 1886 matted barrel's</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1886-matted-barrels/#p180214</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1886-matted-barrels/#p180214</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to determine the rarity of a matted barrel in model 1886 and also the rarity of a 1/2 Octagon matted barrel in model 1886.</p>
<p>I can't find anything in Madl</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 21:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>steve004 on Tiffany Decorated Model 1886</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tiffany-decorated-model-1886/#p180210</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tiffany-decorated-model-1886/#p180210</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>twobit said </strong><br />
When you absolutely, positively, have to have a FANCY rifle!  A friend of mine sent me this link.  Rather interesting.  <a href="https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/788199" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/788199</a><br />
Michael </p>
<p>  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>It would have to be a very mild weather day for me to carry this one in the woods.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>twobit on 1892 SRC sights?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1892-src-sights/#p180209</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1892-src-sights/#p180209</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
<strong>Tony Ford said </strong><br />
is ebay my best bet for a replacement front blade?<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>You might try here:  <a href="https://homesteadparts.com/shop/sight-front-winchester-blade-steel-blued-for-winchester-1873-1892-1894-p-1457.html?cPath=1_9" target="_blank">https://homesteadparts.com/shop/sight-front-winchester-blade-steel-blued-for-winchester-1873-1892-1894-p-1457.html?cPath=1_9</a></p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Tony Ford on 1892 SRC sights?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1892-src-sights/#p180208</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1892-src-sights/#p180208</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>is ebay my best bet for a replacement front blade?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>steve004 on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180205</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180205</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Commissioner said </strong><br />
You know how they spell assume? I just assumed it was for some reason?. I have two others in 45/70,but they are 1886’s. I have three 1873’s 2 44/40’s and one 38/40. The 38/40 was made in 1903. I have the letter. It’s in great shape.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>When I saw your original post, I assumed you had made a mistake.  Turns out you had. Hence your apology.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Chris D on 1892 SRC sights?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1892-src-sights/#p180204</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1892-src-sights/#p180204</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The rear sight and forward proof mark is correct. The front sight blade has been shortened. You can drift the pin out and put a taller blade in. </p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Chris D on Tiffany Decorated Model 1886</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tiffany-decorated-model-1886/#p180203</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tiffany-decorated-model-1886/#p180203</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I was at the Met in Sept 2024, it was fantastic. Too much to see and too little time. I would love to spend more time there. </p>
<p>The 1886 and 1894 were displayed together with some rare side arms. Here are a couple of pictures. </p>
<p>I preferred the 1866 and 1873 in the cabinet opposite the Tiffany Winchesters, that is me in the picture. Bob Reabe told me I should have asked them to take the 1873 out of the case for a closer look <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Laugh" alt="Laugh" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" /></p>
<p>Chris</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="1080" data-height="2400" title="Met-1866-1873.jpg" alt="Met-1866-1873.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/shotgunhemioptusnet-com-au/2026/06/Met-1866-1873.jpg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="3024" data-height="2268" title="Met-Tiffany-1888-1894.jpg" alt="Met-Tiffany-1888-1894.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/shotgunhemioptusnet-com-au/2026/06/Met-Tiffany-1888-1894.jpg" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Tony Ford on 1892 SRC sights?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1892-src-sights/#p180202</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1892-src-sights/#p180202</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I shot my 1892 for the first time today. It was a great time. It grouped well but shot very high. At 50 yards with a 6 oclock hold it was 6 inches high on a 3 inch dot. At 100 yards it was 10 inches high. Are these the correct sights for a 1906 SRC in 44WCF?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I’d like to add a taller front sight blade. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks, Tony</p>
<p><a href="https://postimg.cc/JGJgFzhz" target="_blank"><img alt="https://i.postimg.cc/651Xy7Jn/IMG-0587.jpg" src="https://i.postimg.cc/651Xy7Jn/IMG-0587.jpg" width="612" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://postimg.cc/vc9jKZmD" target="_blank"><img alt="https://i.postimg.cc/ncwJCsbK/IMG-0589.jpg" src="https://i.postimg.cc/ncwJCsbK/IMG-0589.jpg" width="441" /></a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 03:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Commissioner on 1895 Winchester in 45/70?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180200</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1895-winchester-in-45-70/#p180200</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>You know how they spell assume? I just assumed it was for some reason?. I have two others in 45/70,but they are 1886’s. I have three 1873’s 2 44/40’s and one 38/40. The 38/40 was made in 1903. I have the letter. It’s in great shape.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>TXGunNut on But they NEVER made them that way.  24 Inch SRC's!!!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180197</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180197</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>As there were 12 of them there's a slim possibility another will surface with generous provenance but those are very long odds, especially considering the likely destination for all 12. Likely stashed away in some forgotten locker in an armory but we can always hope.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 21:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on But they NEVER made them that way.  24 Inch SRC's!!!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180195</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/but-they-never-made-them-that-way-24-inch-srcs/page-2/#p180195</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, and as I had previously guessed, all (12) of those special order Carbines were apparently ordered and exported to as yet an unknown buyer somewhere in Europe.  Hopefully a few more of them will surface in the years to come and help solve the mystery surrounding them.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 19:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on Tiffany Decorated Model 1886</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tiffany-decorated-model-1886/#p180194</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tiffany-decorated-model-1886/#p180194</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>426crown said </strong><br />
The Met has some nice rifles...................<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes indeed... the Silver alone is spectacular.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 18:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on Tiffany Decorated Model 1886</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tiffany-decorated-model-1886/#p180193</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tiffany-decorated-model-1886/#p180193</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>twobit said </strong><br />
Here is a Model 1894 takedown frame on 30 WCF.  I am surprised that they obliterated the SN.  <a href="https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/24970" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/24970</a><br />
Michael<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>That did not become a legal issue until the GCA of 1968.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>THREEDFLYER on Model 1892 Trapper - Value based on caliber??</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-1892-trapper-value-based-on-caliber/#p180191</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-1892-trapper-value-based-on-caliber/#p180191</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Thank you Michael for the added info and the links to the two auction listings.....very helpful!!</strong></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 17:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
