<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Aleck on 1912 Model 1894 SRC in 30 WCF: Likely Sights at Time Of Manufacture?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1912-model-1894-src-in-30-wcf-likely-sights-at-time-of-manufacture/#p178055</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1912-model-1894-src-in-30-wcf-likely-sights-at-time-of-manufacture/#p178055</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Bert H. said </strong><br />
I can see a slight rub mark (wear) on the top of the barrel halfway between the dovetail and the frame ring.  The rear sight was apparently removed fairly early in the Carbines lifetime.  If the gun were mine, I would find a No. 34C 3-leaf express sight to put back in the empty slot.<br />
Bert<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks. I'm on the hunt for one!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 23:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on 1912 Model 1894 SRC in 30 WCF: Likely Sights at Time Of Manufacture?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1912-model-1894-src-in-30-wcf-likely-sights-at-time-of-manufacture/#p178054</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1912-model-1894-src-in-30-wcf-likely-sights-at-time-of-manufacture/#p178054</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I can see a slight rub mark (wear) on the top of the barrel halfway between the dovetail and the frame ring.  The rear sight was apparently removed fairly early in the Carbines lifetime.  If the gun were mine, I would find a No. 34C 3-leaf express sight to put back in the empty slot.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 23:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Aleck on 1912 Model 1894 SRC in 30 WCF: Likely Sights at Time Of Manufacture?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1912-model-1894-src-in-30-wcf-likely-sights-at-time-of-manufacture/#p178053</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1912-model-1894-src-in-30-wcf-likely-sights-at-time-of-manufacture/#p178053</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Bert H. said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>rogertherelic said<br />
There seems to be no signs the carbine ever had a barrel sight installed.  Is that a possiblity?   RDB<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, but Winchester would have put a blank piece in the dovetail slot versus leaving it empty.<br />
Bert<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks Roger and Bert. I, too, was wondering about the rear sight.</p>
<p>FWIW, here are a couple of higher resolution photos.</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="8192" data-height="5464" title="X2A3011.jpg" alt="X2A3011.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/glenslashpine-com/2026/04/X2A3011.jpg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="8192" data-height="5464" title="X2A3017-3.jpg" alt="X2A3017-3.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/glenslashpine-com/2026/04/X2A3017-3.jpg" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 23:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>1873man on The average 1866</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-4/#p178047</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-4/#p178047</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Here are the bulged cases from firing in my 66.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="4160" data-height="3120" title="IMG_0028.jpeg" alt="IMG_0028.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/1873man/2026/04/IMG_0028.jpeg" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Chuck on The average 1866</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-4/#p178045</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/the-average-1866/page-4/#p178045</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Honestly when I was making my first post I was thinking, should I really post this?  I shouldn't have.  I purposely left out some info.  Don't mess with this unless you have some experience with what is necessary to accomplish this task.</p>
<p>I could not find the pic of the fired and bulged Henry cases that we talked about some time in the past.  When I showed the pic to Lou Behling he said it was a common occurrence. </p>
<p>But here are some pics showing the bolt face of an unmodified rim fire and a modified to center fire. </p>
<p>On the top is an original 66 RF bolt face.  See how it is flush.  The second pic show the conversion to center fire.  NOTICE that the bold face is raised to alleviate the excessive head space.   </p>
<p> </p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="653" data-height="1452" title="Win-1866-Bolt-Face.jpg" alt="Win-1866-Bolt-Face.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/cwachter/2026/04/Win-1866-Bolt-Face.jpg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="327" data-height="615" title="Win-1866-CF-Bolt-Face.jpg" alt="Win-1866-CF-Bolt-Face.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/cwachter/2026/04/Win-1866-CF-Bolt-Face.jpg" /> </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on 1886 lightweight or extra light?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178032</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178032</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>ken1989 said </strong><br />
I have a few extra light weights in my collection.<br />
The stock does have large hole as do my other extra light weights<br />
Front sight is soldered onto barrel.<br />
Does not have a nickel steel (smokeless) barrel.<br />
Need to figure out how to post photos here, probably need a subscription.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you send the pictures to me in an email, I will post them for you.</p>
<p>Bert - <a href="mailto:Win1885@msn.com" target="_blank">Win1885@msn.com</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 01:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>ken1989 on 1886 lightweight or extra light?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178030</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178030</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I have a few extra light weights in my collection.</p>
<p>The stock does have large hole as do my other extra light weights</p>
<p>Front sight is soldered onto barrel.</p>
<p>Does not have a nickel steel (smokeless) barrel.</p>
<p>Need to figure out how to post photos here, probably need a subscription.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 01:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>cj57 on 1886 lightweight or extra light?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178024</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178024</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Ken,  </p>
<p>That sounds like a cool gun! Another tell tail sign of being a lightweight is a ramp front sight, please post some photos of this gem!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 23:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on 1886 lightweight or extra light?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178021</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178021</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>ken1989 said </strong><br />
I have a special order 1886 with a 26" barrel that letters as a lightweight. Burt, back in 2019 we had some email communication about this rifle. These are your comments "I have not seen an ELW Rifle with a 26-inch barrel until today.  All of them I have encountered thus far have had a 22-inch barrel.  In addition to the extra long extra lightweight barrel, the plain PG stock without any checkering is somewhat uncommon, and the sight configuration is quite unusual as well (I would have expected a Lyman tang sight with the Lyman No. 6 rear sight and the Lyman No. 4 front sight).  Somebody specifically special ordered the Marbles Flexible Joint tang sight."<br />
WINCHESTER MODEL 1886 - SERIAL NUMBER 13910X<br />
Serial number application date not available<br />
Type: Rifle<br />
Caliber: 40/65<br />
Barrel Type: Round<br />
Barrel Length: 26 inches<br />
Extra Light<br />
Trigger: Plain<br />
Plain, Pistol grip<br />
Sights: Marbles flex joint rear, Lyman leaf, Lyman hunting front sights<br />
1/2 Magazine<br />
Shotgun butt rubber<br />
Received in warehouse on October 07, 1907<br />
Shipped from warehouse on October 09, 1907, Order number 113329<br />
 <br />
FYI,  This is my first post. Long time Winchester collector.  Presently a "Guest", will join when my Cody membership is up for renewal.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>What you have is a special-ordered rifle with a barrel that is lighter than standard.  In the strictest sense, it is not a true ELW. </p>
<p>Based on the factory ledger record information, it apparently does not have Nickel Steel (smokeless powder) barrel.  How is the front sight attached to the barrel?  Does it have large bored hole in the butt stock?</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 21:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>oldcrankyyankee on 1886 lightweight or extra light?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178020</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178020</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest that it maybe referring to the barrel profile. Winchester did use a barrel called a rapid taper. Standard round barrels had a very slight taper to the muzzle, appox .002" per inch. The rapid taper was .005" per inch, same as barrels 32" and longer. I would measure the dia. at muzzle than breach and see.  I have a 45-90 with the rapid taper, thru me for a loop until I learned about the rapid taper barrels.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 21:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>ken1989 on 1886 lightweight or extra light?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178016</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1886-lightweight-or-extra-light/page-2/#p178016</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I have a special order 1886 with a 26" barrel that letters as a lightweight. Burt, back in 2019 we had some email communication about this rifle. These are your comments "<em>I have not seen an ELW Rifle with a 26-inch barrel until today.  All of them I have encountered thus far have had a 22-inch barrel.  In addition to the extra long extra lightweight barrel, the plain PG stock without any checkering is somewhat uncommon, and the sight configuration is quite unusual as well (I would have expected a Lyman tang sight with the Lyman No. 6 rear sight and the Lyman No. 4 front sight).  Somebody specifically special ordered the Marbles Flexible Joint tang sight."</em></p>
<p>WINCHESTER MODEL 1886 - SERIAL NUMBER 13910X<br />
Serial number application date not available<br />
Type: Rifle<br />
Caliber: 40/65<br />
Barrel Type: Round<br />
Barrel Length: 26 inches<br />
Extra Light<br />
Trigger: Plain<br />
Plain, Pistol grip<br />
Sights: Marbles flex joint rear, Lyman leaf, Lyman hunting front sights<br />
1/2 Magazine<br />
Shotgun butt rubber<br />
Received in warehouse on October 07, 1907<br />
Shipped from warehouse on October 09, 1907, Order number 113329</p>
<p> </p>
<p>FYI,  This is my first post. Long time Winchester collector.  Presently a "Guest", will join when my Cody membership is up for renewal.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 21:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jim F in CT on Model 70 Featherweight . . . .</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-70-featherweight/#p178005</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-70-featherweight/#p178005</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Lou . . .</p>
<p>Monte Carlo . . .rear sight looks just like yours.</p>
<p>As an interesting note (to me!) . . . .</p>
<p>I have the original bill of sale for this gem . . . .</p>
<p>”Purchased in 1952, from Haggetts’ (hardware store) in Concord, New Hampshire, $120”.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 14:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Louis Luttrell on Model 70 Featherweight . . . .</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-70-featherweight/#p178004</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-70-featherweight/#p178004</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Jim-</p>
<p>Low comb or Monte Carlo, and what rear sight is on it?  For the survey...</p>
<p>This is my earliest 22-inch Featherweight.  Low comb, S/N 224336.  It may provoke howls of disagreement, but in he early catalogs, the Featherweight was both pictured and described as having a folding rear sight (Marbles 69) regardless of stock style.  I believe that this is correct.  The tall version of the 22K "sporting" style sight for low comb Featherweights came about in 1954, so starts showing up on later 1953 receivers.  Of course, I could be mistaken!!!</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="3000" data-height="1769" title="FWT-SN-224336-copy.jpg" alt="FWT-SN-224336-copy.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/luttrellmusc-edu/2026/04/FWT-SN-224336-copy.jpg" /></p>
<p>Note that this one doesn't have the extra hyphen either.  I was worried about it, but I've since found about a half dozen early ones (22-inch barrel) marked with that die.  Look at Photo 4-32 in Rule's book (you might need to open your hard copy as the image reproduction in the paperback edition is lousy).  That one shows the "dash" on a barrel he said is dated '52...</p>
<p>Lou</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 14:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jim F in CT on Model 70 Featherweight . . . .</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-70-featherweight/#p178003</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-70-featherweight/#p178003</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys . . .</p>
<p>For the record, I have an early 1952 Featherweight (#221891) 22” barrel, 308 caliber, of course.</p>
<p>It does NOT have the extra hyphen in the roll mark.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 14:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Louis Luttrell on Model 70 Featherweight . . . .</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-70-featherweight/#p178002</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-70-featherweight/#p178002</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim-</p>
<p>The 24-inch barreled Featherweight was specifically offered as an option in the 1952-54 catalogs.  I agree with you and Bob that they must not have sold many, and the option was dropped before the Featherweight was offered in anything except 308 WIN.  In surveying, I have only run across four that I thought were genuine (including the one in Rule's book), plus about that many fabricated ones...  The highest serial numbered one I've seen to date is in the 240,000 range.</p>
<p>As for Wayne's 24-inch Featherweight, the S/N is 219278, one of the lowest Featherweight serial numbers recorded, as Featherweights don't become common until around S/N 222,000.  I know that the person Wayne sold it to is NOT the collector who purchased his special order 308 WIN Bull Gun... <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Wink" alt="Wink" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-wink.gif" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="3000" data-height="1769" title="FWT-SN-219278-copy-1.jpg" alt="FWT-SN-219278-copy-1.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/luttrellmusc-edu/2026/04/FWT-SN-219278-copy-1.jpg" /></p>
<p>I do not know why the Forum site stopped displaying thumbnails in the text a week or so ago...  <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Cry" alt="Cry" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-cry.gif" />For those eagle eyed and critical viewers, the wonky "FEATHERWEIGHT" letters and extra dash in "MODEL-70-FEATHERWEIGHT" is a "real" roll die used in some early 308 WIN Featherweights.  Most 308 WIN Featherweights, unlike all other Featherweight chamberings, are usually marked "MODEL-70 FEATHERWEIGHT" (without the extra dash).   </p>
<p>If you find another genuine 24-inch Featherweight I hope you'll tell me the S/N and whether it's got a MC or LC stock (for the survey)... <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Laugh" alt="Laugh" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" /></p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Lou</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
