<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>twobit on Here are some of my Winchester model 1892’s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182399</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182399</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
<strong>Commissioner said </strong><br />
I just checked the Winchester letter. It is my 1873 that is 1903. The model 92 serial number is 846400, it puts it at 1916. The upper tang says Model 1892 over -Winchester-,under Winchester it says Trade mark US Patent Office &#038; FGN.  I think.  My eyes are not so good. I hope this helps you.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for taking a look.  Any chance that it has a similar looking stamp on the left side of the receiver?</p>
<p>Michael</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="1920" data-height="1080" title="Merz-2.JPG" alt="Merz-2.JPG" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/twobit/2026/08/Merz-2.JPG" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="746" data-height="534" title="00025_Belle-CARABINE-WINCHESTER-1892-cal-44-40-canon-court-bois-sculpte--1.JPG" alt="00025_Belle-CARABINE-WINCHESTER-1892-cal-44-40-canon-court-bois-sculpte--1.JPG" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/twobit/2026/08/00025_Belle-CARABINE-WINCHESTER-1892-cal-44-40-canon-court-bois-sculpte--1.JPG" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Brodg88 on 1864 New Haven Arms Henry Rifle, Serial No. 7516 — Seeking Collector Input</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1864-new-haven-arms-henry-rifle-serial-no-7516-seeking-collector-input/page-2/#p182397</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1864-new-haven-arms-henry-rifle-serial-no-7516-seeking-collector-input/page-2/#p182397</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello all, <br />
I've decided to sell this piece and added it first, based on a member's suggestion, to the Swap Section as a listing. <br />
<a href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-swap-meet/for-sale-new-haven-arms-henry-rifle-sn-7516-accepting-offers/ " target="_blank">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-swap-meet/for-sale-new-haven-arms-henry-rifle-sn-7516-accepting-offers/ </a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 17:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Commissioner on Here are some of my Winchester model 1892’s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182395</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182395</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="3264" data-height="2448" title="IMG_0023.jpeg" alt="IMG_0023.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/commissioner/2026/08/IMG_0023.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="3264" data-height="2448" title="IMG_0022.jpeg" alt="IMG_0022.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/commissioner/2026/08/IMG_0022.jpeg" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Commissioner on Here are some of my Winchester model 1892’s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182394</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182394</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I just checked the Winchester letter. It is my 1873 that is 1903. The model 92 serial number is 846400, it puts it at 1916. The upper tang says Model 1892 over -Winchester-,under Winchester it says Trade mark US Patent Office &#038; FGN.  I think.  My eyes are not so good. I hope this helps you.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jeremy P on Value of a Cody Letter</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/value-of-a-cody-letter/#p182391</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/value-of-a-cody-letter/#p182391</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>antler1 said </strong><br />
I just checked the tang and stock and they all match 906XX and 906 on stock. What nobody has ventured to address so far is how this mismatched letter to an obvious high grade 1886 will affect it's price.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't yet have the eye of others, but everything looks nice to me...I think with the matching numbers and all else considered, it won't matter much at all....maybe to some folks, but not most folks.</p>
<p>Is it possible the mag tube is not original? I've never seen one split like that, even knowing how they're made.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>twobit on Here are some of my Winchester model 1892’s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182390</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182390</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Commissioner said </strong><br />
Fellows: Check these out!top is a 45 Long Colt made by Miroku and imported. Next is a Winchester Saddle Ring Carbine in 44/40. Made in 1903.. still in great shape. Bright bore. I killed a Deer with it two years ago. Next down is a beautiful case colored Octogon  barreled 45 Long Colt made by Armi San Marco’s, next down is special grade Case Colored octogon barreled 44 Magnum. Made by Miroku and imported by Browning. Last but not least is a beautifully engraved 45 Long Colt imported by Winchester and made under license to Miroku of Japan. Some really nice guns here.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Nice collection.  Can I get the SN and some detail images of the upper tang and the barrel address on the 1903 SRC so that I can add it into my research survey?</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Commissioner on Here are some of my Winchester model 1892’s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182387</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182387</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks: I am gun poor. I have lots that are not Winchesters. I have a beautiful Savage 99 in 308 that looks like it just came from the factory. Not a mark on it anywhere. I have killed deer with it in the past. It has a Gold trigger and a Leopold 3x 9. Some beautiful Marlins too! I have lots of bolt actions also. I even have a bolt action in 45/70. I have a one of a kind Model 70, high relief engraved with a carved stock. It was made in 1957. I also have a large collection of Pistols and revolvers. Over 50 of them. Many Colt SAA’s, Beretta’s,etc.  guns everywhere. I have been truly blessed. Many say I am nuts for still buying them. I bought six last week. A Winchester Model 1892 short rifle in 25/20. A Three screw Ruger Blackhawk in 30 carbine. Two Remington 742’s, one in 243 and one in 30/06. Two K 98 Mausers. One in 45/70 and a Hightower custom in 7 mm Mag. I’ll get some of them tomorrow. I don’t know where I am going to put them yet. My kids think I am nuts? I am 91 years old. I do this when I am not fishing or hunting. The fish are biting. The river is full of Stripers. The ocean is full of Salmon, Halibut and Tuna. The Tuna are Close in. Everyone is limiting out. I have my limits the last two times I fished. I am going again tomorrow.  Life is good! Cheers!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on Value of a Cody Letter</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/value-of-a-cody-letter/#p182386</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/value-of-a-cody-letter/#p182386</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Pat,</p>
<p>Good points are once again brought up here, but only the true Die Hard Collectors seem to go by the Cody Letter's, as many nice rifle sell without a Cody letter or any documentation! IMHO!</p>
<p>I also like to see a good letter with as much info on it, but we've been around long enough and seen this before, and will see it again!</p>
<p>You're rifle will command a good $$$ on any good auction site, and Especially on Gun Broker, where many go with extra money to spend and bid things up pretty high! Especially a good looker like yours! IMO! </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>antler1 on Value of a Cody Letter</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/value-of-a-cody-letter/#p182385</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/value-of-a-cody-letter/#p182385</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>TXGunNut said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>antler1 said<br />
I just checked the tang and stock and they all match 906XX and 906 on stock. What nobody has ventured to address so far is how this mismatched letter to an obvious high grade 1886 will affect it's price.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Pat-<br />
I'm afraid it's a long ways down that "excuse gun" trail. My personal feelings stop where the next buyer's pocketbook starts. I think it's a great gun but when the time comes to sell it the information contained in the letter will affect some buyers more than others. Most or all of us have had "excuse guns" and they're a tough sell. Someone with the required expertise and experience will recognize it as an honest gun, as I believe you did. In today's market buyers are sometimes afraid to trust their own judgement but with the high quality fakes we see who can blame them? Many buyers buy to re-sell and simply don't want the "excuse" headache. Letters are an integral part of this hobby but at some point we need to decide if we're buying a gun or a letter. I think Ian has a good feel for the actual numbers on probable sales price but also significant is the percentage of buyers who will eagerly buy a rifle like yours that matches the letter while declining to make an offer on this rifle. That number is hard to put a finger on but certainly a factor.<br />
 <br />
Mike<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Very well stated Mike. I will not intend to keep this as part of my permanent Winchester collection and it is obvious by my post that I have already decided to inform a large collecting audience of its downfall. I would not try to knowingly misrepresent it as other than an above grade highly collectible 1886 in 45-70 with this one problem. This 1886 will be for sale in the near future.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on Tang and cross-bolt safeties vs. traditional?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tang-and-cross-bolt-safeties-vs-traditional/#p182384</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tang-and-cross-bolt-safeties-vs-traditional/#p182384</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Zebulon said </strong><br />
Tony,<br />
Your Shiloh saddle gun is beautiful in that way as well. Only the truly mentally impaired have to guess whether a Sharps is loaded and what to do about it. <br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bill,</p>
<p>I concur! <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Smile" alt="Smile" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" /></p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Commissioner on Some of my Winchester Model 1873’s.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/some-of-my-winchester-model-1873s/#p182382</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/some-of-my-winchester-model-1873s/#p182382</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I auctually have seven. I found two more on the other side of the safe. Short barreled. Both are case colored. One is a SRC in 357/38 special the other is in 45-Long Colt. Both beautiful rifles. Sorry I left them out.  I’ll post some of my 1894’s and 9422’s. I also have some beautiful Marlins I might post?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>tionesta1 on Here are some of my Winchester model 1892’s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182381</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182381</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful set of model 92's.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on Tang and cross-bolt safeties vs. traditional?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tang-and-cross-bolt-safeties-vs-traditional/#p182380</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/tang-and-cross-bolt-safeties-vs-traditional/#p182380</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>Your Shiloh saddle gun is beautiful in that way as well. Only the truly mentally impaired have to guess whether a Sharps is loaded and what to do about it. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Commissioner on Here are some of my Winchester model 1892’s</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182379</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/here-are-some-of-my-winchester-model-1892s/#p182379</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>You are not telling me anything I don’t know. The stock has NOT been heavily sanded. I bought it to shoot. The barrel is pristine. It shoots POA. The never was any rust or pitting anywhere. I would much rather have this then an original beat up piece of crap, that some cherish for their “Originallity” I like nice finished guns. My safe is full of them. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>TXGunNut on Value of a Cody Letter</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/value-of-a-cody-letter/#p182378</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/value-of-a-cody-letter/#p182378</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>antler1 said </strong><br />
I just checked the tang and stock and they all match 906XX and 906 on stock. What nobody has ventured to address so far is how this mismatched letter to an obvious high grade 1886 will affect it's price.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Pat-</p>
<p>I'm afraid it's a long ways down that "excuse gun" trail. My personal feelings stop where the next buyer's pocketbook starts. I think it's a great gun but when the time comes to sell it the information contained in the letter will affect some buyers more than others. Most or all of us have had "excuse guns" and they're a tough sell. Someone with the required expertise and experience will recognize it as an honest gun, as I believe you did. In today's market buyers are sometimes afraid to trust their own judgement but with the high quality fakes we see who can blame them? Many buyers buy to re-sell and simply don't want the "excuse" headache. Letters are an integral part of this hobby but at some point we need to decide if we're buying a gun or a letter. I think Ian has a good feel for the actual numbers on probable sales price but also significant is the percentage of buyers who will eagerly buy a rifle like yours that matches the letter while declining to make an offer on this rifle. That number is hard to put a finger on but certainly a factor.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
