<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on Model 92 Takedown Rifle With Octagonal Barrel in .44 W.C.F.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180315</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180315</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
<strong>tsbccut said </strong><br />
Thanks again, Michael.<br />
Looks to be about 1.05% (10,549) of total production (1,004,675) by my numbers.<br />
Collector's terms, I know, and most likely subjective, but what are the percentage levels for terms such as "rare" and "scarce" in your opinion? Or is there a standard?<br />
Much appreciated,<br />
Tom<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Speaking only for myself, "rare" is fewer than (10) total specimens, and "scarce" is &#060; 500 specimens.  I would refer to a production total of 10,549 as "slightly uncommon". </p>
<p>Keep in mind that the total Model 53 production was 15,118, and the total Model 65 production was approximately 7,746.  We do not consider either of those models as "rare" or even "scarce".</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on Model 92 Takedown Rifle With Octagonal Barrel in .44 W.C.F.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180314</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180314</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Just a possible point of interest, the total number of serialized Model 1892/92/53/65 receiver frames was actually <strong>1,007,608 </strong>(not 1,004,675 number published by past authors). </p>
<p>Of the total 1,007,608 number, <strong>4,244</strong> of them were Model 53 rifles serialized in the Model 92 range, and approximately <strong>7,746</strong> more of them were Model 65 rifles all serial numbered in the Model 92 sequence.  All told, the actual total Model 1892/92 production was approximately just <strong>995,618</strong> guns.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>tsbccut on Model 92 Takedown Rifle With Octagonal Barrel in .44 W.C.F.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180312</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180312</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again, Michael.</p>
<p>Looks to be about 1.05% (10,549) of total production (1,004,675) by my numbers.</p>
<p>Collector's terms, I know, and most likely subjective, but what are the percentage levels for terms such as "rare" and "scarce" in your opinion? Or is there a standard?</p>
<p>Much appreciated,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on 94/95 Carbine hybrid?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180311</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180311</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Anthony said </strong><br />
Bert,<br />
Thanks for the extra explanation, as I surly do value that as I'm sure others will!<br />
 <br />
Tony<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>You (and everyone else) are welcome.</p>
<p>As you can most likely tell, I and a "numbers" person.  I have at least 700+ active Excel spreadsheets on my PC, and I add at least a couple more every month.  Some of my Spreadsheets are nearing 30-years old (upgraded of course through the years).  I first began actively creating and using Excel when Office 97 first hit the streets.  In the early years, all formulas had to be manually created (programmed) and inserted.  To this day, I still write all of my own formulas even though Excel now has a few hundred of them built-in.</p>
<p>Bert </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on 94/95 Carbine hybrid?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180308</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180308</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Bert,</p>
<p>Thanks for the extra explanation, as I surly do value that as I'm sure others will! <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Smile" alt="Smile" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on 94/95 Carbine hybrid?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180306</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180306</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>Other than the PR records, there are no surviving records beyond May 1907.</p>
<p>Per the PR records, Winchester serialized <strong>25,912</strong> Model 94 receiver frames in the year 1928 (several thousand of which were assembled as Model 55 rifles). Per my extrapolation table (derived from the current survey totals), of the 25,912 total Model 94 &#038; 55 guns manufactured in the year 1928, Model 94 Carbines made up 17,383 (67%) of the total production.</p>
<p>Thus far, I have surveyed &#038; documented <strong>793</strong> (3.06%) of the 25,912 total rifles &#038; carbines manufactured in the year 1928 (see the table below).  Of that total, <strong>638</strong> are Model 94s, with <strong>532</strong> of them being Carbines, <strong>9</strong>2 of which are 94/95 Hybrids.  </p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="791" data-height="120" title="Survey-1928-totals.jpg" alt="Survey-1928-totals.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/bert-h/2026/06/Survey-1928-totals.jpg" /></p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on 94/95 Carbine hybrid?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180305</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180305</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Bert,</p>
<p>That's beautiful work, and very time consuming I'm sure. I like the Excel spread sheet format. </p>
<p>You indicate you have the 92 documented of the possible 1306 that we're most likely manufactured. With 20,702 numbers between the first serial numbered example in the combined members Survey, and the last serial numbered example. I'm thinking with you're documented research, and the information based on factory records and polishing room records, on the other 19396 remaining examples, which probably had longer barrels, including the known examples and the unknown examples, from surveys. The remaining 1306 having the 20 inch barrels and or the possible 21.75" barrel.  Was this barrel length in the records, indicating a possible Hybrid? </p>
<p>Tony,</p>
<p>Currently, I have documented (92) of the (1,306) Model 94/95 hybrids that were most likely manufactured. </p>
<p>By you stating, "Most likely manufactured", it has me wondering, and as Collector/owners of these or possible owners of these, many like to pursue the rare things that might be out there. Being mfg. in 1928, it makes these possibly easier to pursue and maybe something to stumble upon at a gun show vs. say an Antique Winchester that is already harder to find than the proverbial Hens teeth!</p>
<p>You're work along with the others is truly appreciated! <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Smile" alt="Smile" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" /></p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>twobit on Model 92 Takedown Rifle With Octagonal Barrel in .44 W.C.F.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180304</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180304</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>tsbccut said </strong><br />
Thank you Michael. Great information.<br />
Do you have data that addresses the octagonal barrel part of the question?<br />
What percentage of total 1892-1941 production were sporting rifles?<br />
Tom<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>84% of the 44 WCF takedown frames have octagon shaped barrels.  Sporting rifles made up 70% of the total production.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>tsbccut on Model 92 Takedown Rifle With Octagonal Barrel in .44 W.C.F.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180303</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180303</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Michael. Great information.</p>
<p>Do you have data that addresses the octagonal barrel part of the question?</p>
<p>What percentage of total 1892-1941 production were sporting rifles?</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on 94/95 Carbine hybrid?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180301</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180301</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>Currently, I have documented (92) of the (1,306) Model 94/95 hybrids that were most likely manufactured.  Based on the serial numbers and their associated PR dates, I believe that Winchester assembled all of them very late in the year 1928.  As of now, all (92) found thus far have a 1928 PR date, with the vast majority of them in the late May to early October time period.  The tables below are a snap-shot of my current Excel survey file.</p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="1341" data-height="3001" title="Model-94-95-Hybrid-survey.jpg" alt="Model-94-95-Hybrid-survey.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/bert-h/2026/06/Model-94-95-Hybrid-survey.jpg" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="791" data-height="210" title="Model-94-95-Hybrids.jpg" alt="Model-94-95-Hybrids.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/bert-h/2026/06/Model-94-95-Hybrids.jpg" /></p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>twobit on Model 92 Takedown Rifle With Octagonal Barrel in .44 W.C.F.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180300</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180300</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>tsbccut said </strong><br />
A question probably most easily answered by Michael. How uncommon is a Model 92 takedown standard Sporting rifle with octagonal barrel in .44 W.C.F.?<br />
 <br />
Thanks,<br />
Tom<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hello Tom,</p>
<p>It is interesting to see the distribution of the various calibers as presented in takedown frame rifles.  I have calculated this a couple of times as I continue to gather more samples in my survey.  Approximately 10% of all sporting rifles were manufactured with takedown frames.  The relative popularity is inverse to the caliber size. </p>
<p>25-20 WCF 39%</p>
<p>32 WCF 29%</p>
<p>38 WCF 16%</p>
<p>44 WCF 15%</p>
<p>I hope this helps</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>tsbccut on Model 92 Takedown Rifle With Octagonal Barrel in .44 W.C.F.</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180299</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/model-92-takedown-rifle-with-octagonal-barrel-in-44-w-c-f/#p180299</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>A question probably most easily answered by Michael. How uncommon is a Model 92 takedown standard Sporting rifle with octagonal barrel in .44 W.C.F.?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on Welcome to the Winchester Rifles Forum</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/Welcome+to+the+Winchester+Rifles+Forum/page-4/#p180297</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/Welcome+to+the+Winchester+Rifles+Forum/page-4/#p180297</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome Duckman,</p>
<p>Like Henry said, you're not considered old around here, as we all enjoy the Hobby, and share the info. as much as we can, as you said you noticed as a guest.</p>
<p>Showing some pictures of you're Winchesters wouldn't hurt anybody's feelings, and it will help you get acclimated to the format for sharing pics. here also. </p>
<p>Who knows you might pick up a few tips or pointers on something that you weren't sure or didn't know about. Some very knowledgeable, and unselfish collectors show up here! <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Smile" alt="Smile" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on 94/95 Carbine hybrid?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180296</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/9495+Carbine+hybrid%3F/page-6/#p180296</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I was re reading the many posts on this topic that I find very interesting, as it shows there's almost 14,000 views. Which tells me that many others, as far back as 2014, as far as I can tell, also see as interesting. </p>
<p>Looking back at the many posts and comments I feel it's important to take notice on the research that has been done here by many and the ongoing and further research that Bert is doing. </p>
<p>In some of the earlier posts, as I have an advantage of looking back, I didn't see where anyone referenced a time of original 1928 production period of these very special and interesting Hybrid 94/95 rifles. My point being that it's no secret to when the economy at that time started to depress, as "The Great Depression", was looming. One of the greater Winchester Referencing books, that many have refereed to here on the Forum, is "The Gun that Won the West, by Harold Williamson. In it he shows and explains with many factual informative historical versions of time how the Great Winchester Corporation, not only started but survived during many tough times, as was the case in point, " The Great Depression", Era!  </p>
<p>Bert,</p>
<p>I was wondering what you're updated survey on this subject indicates, and feel members pics wouldn't be a bad thing to add here also. <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Smile" alt="Smile" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" /></p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Henry Mero on Welcome to the Winchester Rifles Forum</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/Welcome+to+the+Winchester+Rifles+Forum/page-4/#p180295</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/Welcome+to+the+Winchester+Rifles+Forum/page-4/#p180295</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome duckman, You're not really an old guy yet 'cause that would make Me a really old guy,(78). Anyways enjoy the forum and use the knowledge that is freely given here.   Harry</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
