<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester Rifles</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on Opinions on (Browning) 1885 High Wall 40/65 BPCR model.?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179671</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179671</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I am still digesting the pair of 99EGs. The .300 has a Redfield 70 receiver sight, my favorite. The 250 has only a barrel mounted rear, but the tang is tapped for receiver sights. After reviewing the scalper prices for "S" coded vintage sights, I asked Midway to ship me their Improved tang sight for the 99, something else to digest, and I sold my 250 dies last year....</p>
<p>The EG rifles are just too sleek to encumber with scopes. The R was intended for that and mine is scoped. However, I still need to shim the scope base because the range of elevation is too limited. Leupold used to make a base with a built in 7 degree tilt, just for the 99. Somewhere there was a failure to communicate....</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 04:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>TXGunNut on Opinions on (Browning) 1885 High Wall 40/65 BPCR model.?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179669</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179669</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Might be fun, Zeb. Does it have sights? Some of those sights cost more than a few of my rifles. I don't cast for that cartridge but I understand it shoots a bit flatter than the 45-70. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 02:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on Opinions on (Browning) 1885 High Wall 40/65 BPCR model.?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179662</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179662</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>TXGunNut said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>Zebulon said<br />
I'm considering one. <br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I understand they're great up to the rams, may have to hold a little high to ensure they fall over. Save the light bullets for the chickens. Since I don't play that game it would need to have spectacular wood or a bargain price tag, preferably both!<br />
 <br />
Mike<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think I've talked myself out of it. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 23:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>steve004 on Winchester 1894 early serial number</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179660</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179660</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Anthony said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>steve004 said<br />
That carbine has seen some weather!  A top, "poster child" candidate for the descriptor, "weathered appearance."  Also a poster child for, "glossy revarnish."  Were it mine (which likely wouldn't happen) I get rid of the varnish very quickly.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Steve,<br />
I also noticed that shiny varnish that looks terrible on it. Like, cj57 said, the heavy cleaning that was done with the steel wool and emery paper, is obvious. How about the wood to metal fit that's pretty obvious as the sanded rounded corner on the wood, hence the heavy varnish being applied, as a cleaned up example and a poor refinish job over dirt and debris, maybe to make it possibly look older or more antique sh ! <br />
Tony<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I agree Tony.  I think that what's been done to it takes it out of the realm of, "character" carbine - which is the most it could be.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 23:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on Winchester 1894 early serial number</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179657</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179657</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>steve004 said </strong><br />
That carbine has seen some weather!  A top, "poster child" candidate for the descriptor, "weathered appearance."  Also a poster child for, "glossy revarnish."  Were it mine (which likely wouldn't happen) I get rid of the varnish very quickly.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Steve,</p>
<p>I also noticed that shiny varnish that looks terrible on it. Like, cj57 said, the heavy cleaning that was done with the steel wool and emery paper, is obvious. How about the wood to metal fit that's pretty obvious as the sanded rounded corner on the wood, hence the heavy varnish being applied, as a cleaned up example and a poor refinish job over dirt and debris, maybe to make it possibly look older or more antique sh ! </p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 21:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>steve004 on Winchester 1894 early serial number</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179655</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179655</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>That carbine has seen some weather!  A top, "poster child" candidate for the descriptor, "weathered appearance."  Also a poster child for, "glossy revarnish."  Were it mine (which likely wouldn't happen) I get rid of the varnish very quickly.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 20:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>TXGunNut on Opinions on (Browning) 1885 High Wall 40/65 BPCR model.?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179654</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179654</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Zebulon said </strong><br />
I'm considering one. <br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I understand they're great up to the rams, may have to hold a little high to ensure they fall over. Save the light bullets for the chickens. Since I don't play that game it would need to have spectacular wood or a bargain price tag, preferably both!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 20:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on Opinions on (Browning) 1885 High Wall 40/65 BPCR model.?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179649</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-on-browning-1885-high-wall-40-65-bpcr-model/#p179649</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm considering one. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Chuck on 1876 questions </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1876-questions/#p179635</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/1876-questions/#p179635</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>You can get a Factory letter for your rifle.  Contact Tisha Johnson at <a href="mailto:tishaj20@gmnail.com" target="_blank">tishaj20@gmnail.com</a>.  She will need the Model and serial number.  If you have an interest in Sharps there is a fairly new 5 book set that you can order from the Sharps collectors.  You may want to buy Vol III.</p>
<p>My guess is that your rifle is a Model 1877 Sporting Rifle modified by Freund.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 15:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Mrgold on Winchester 1894 early serial number</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179626</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179626</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>cj57 said </strong><br />
The photos opened for me and you can see the caliber marking 32-40, it has no finish on metal left and cleaned heavily with steel wool and or emery paper. The wood has a very poor refinish job and the bore is not very good, but may still shoot ok. I would pass or not pay very much for it<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Steven Gabrielli said </strong><br />
Agreed, pass, too rough, unless you can get it for a song.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes you are both correct and Bert has also confirmed this. Unfortunately it's not for sale cheap so will have to pass on it. </p>
<p>Just a shame that someone down the line treated this rifle so roughly. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Buck1967 on Interested in adding a 1964 Wyoming Jubilee “Antique” Model or a 2000 Black Shadow Brushed Chrome to your collection?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/interested-in-adding-a-1964-wyoming-jubilee-antique-model-or-a-2000-black-shadow-brushed-chrome-to-your-collection/#p179620</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/interested-in-adding-a-1964-wyoming-jubilee-antique-model-or-a-2000-black-shadow-brushed-chrome-to-your-collection/#p179620</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>GKADLEC194 said </strong><br />
Both are New Old Stock.  Never fired.  Please email me at <a href="mailto:gkadlec194@yahoo.com" target="_blank">gkadlec194@yahoo.com</a> with questions if you are interested.  They both will sell for $2000+.  You also can Text me at 614-580-1750.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Don’t think I’ve seen a WDJ sell for close to 2k but being the very first Winchester commemorative helps its value amongst a certain crowd. Can you post pics so we can see it? What is the serial # and does it have the matching original box and papers? <br />
Look forward to seeing it, thanks</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 22:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>GKADLEC194 on Interested in adding a 1964 Wyoming Jubilee “Antique” Model or a 2000 Black Shadow Brushed Chrome to your collection?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/interested-in-adding-a-1964-wyoming-jubilee-antique-model-or-a-2000-black-shadow-brushed-chrome-to-your-collection/#p179613</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/interested-in-adding-a-1964-wyoming-jubilee-antique-model-or-a-2000-black-shadow-brushed-chrome-to-your-collection/#p179613</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Both are New Old Stock.  Never fired.  Please email me at <a href="mailto:gkadlec194@yahoo.com" target="_blank">gkadlec194@yahoo.com</a> with questions if you are interested.  They both will sell for $2000+.  You also can Text me at 614-580-1750.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 20:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Steven Gabrielli on Winchester 1894 early serial number</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179612</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179612</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, pass, too rough, unless you can get it for a song.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 18:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>cj57 on Winchester 1894 early serial number</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179611</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179611</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The photos opened for me and you can see the caliber marking 32-40, it has no finish on metal left and cleaned heavily with steel wool and or emery paper. The wood has a very poor refinish job and the bore is not very good, but may still shoot ok. I would pass or not pay very much for it</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 18:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Mrgold on Winchester 1894 early serial number</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179609</link>
                    <category>Winchester Rifles</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-1894-early-serial-number/#p179609</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Bert H. said </strong><br />
The URL to the pictures does not work correctly.  The pictures are not viewable without being logged into the account.  Please send the pictures directly to my email.<br />
In response to your question(s), it is a second year Model 1894 (May 1895), and as such, it is most likely a 32-40.<br />
Bert - <a href="mailto:Win1885@msn.com" target="_blank">Win1885@msn.com</a><br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bert,</p>
<p>Thank you for the confirmation of year and for the month of production. </p>
<p>I just sent you an email and please do let me know which image hosting works best as I do not have much experience with this. </p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 17:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
