Zebulon said

Jeremy P said

Zebulon said
I've only seen the 1906 at shows. 

I have one I'll bring you if you've never really gotten to manipulate one....early was .22 short and later S-L-LR....I can show you the different carrier, it's just a subtle mechanism change, hardly anything at all. Super fun to shoot! The action feels dainty at first (probably the skinny forend wood IMO), but they're obviously tough old girls in reality.
I agree the half-nickel is more attractive.
  

That would be interesting. I will bring my Model 62 for comparison. I put a Marble's tang sight on it and still.need to get it sighted in to suit me.
All I can recall about the one Model 90 I had was it was considerably heavier than my 62. I expect the octagon barrel made for a lot of the difference. 
  

To add to the enlightenment (or confusion) I'll bring an 1890 in 22LR (from our friend Randy Saba!) and one in 22WRF. Latter needs to be shot as it has been on my table for a few shows and will hopefully be under someone else's care soon. I think I have a nice 62 around here but that would probably add to the confusion.

Mike

Jeremy P said

Zebulon said
I've only seen the 1906 at shows. 

I have one I'll bring you if you've never really gotten to manipulate one....early was .22 short and later S-L-LR....I can show you the different carrier, it's just a subtle mechanism change, hardly anything at all. Super fun to shoot! The action feels dainty at first (probably the skinny forend wood IMO), but they're obviously tough old girls in reality.
I agree the half-nickel is more attractive.
  

That would be interesting. I will bring my Model 62 for comparison. I put a Marble's tang sight on it and still.need to get it sighted in to suit me.

All I can recall about the one Model 90 I had was it was considerably heavier than my 62. I expect the octagon barrel made for a lot of the difference. 

Zebulon said
I've only seen the 1906 at shows. 

I have one I'll bring you if you've never really gotten to manipulate one....early was .22 short and later S-L-LR....I can show you the different carrier, it's just a subtle mechanism change, hardly anything at all. Super fun to shoot! The action feels dainty at first (probably the skinny forend wood IMO), but they're obviously tough old girls in reality.

I agree the half-nickel is more attractive.

Blue Ridge Parson said
The 1906 Winchester was designed from the beginning (by way of a special cartridge carrier) to shoot Short, Long, or Long rifle interchangeably. 
BRP
  

Not quite from the beginning, the very first Model 1906's were only available in .22 Short.......

Best Regards,

BRP

I've never gotten straight whether the 1906 was cartridge length specific or would take s/l/lr interchangeably like the later.Model 62. 

Funny, but at all the Fall carnivals Dad and I went to in the Fifties, the shooting galleries never had pump action rifles, only butt magazine automatics they could feed with a loader. Mostly Remingtons but once a Model 63 Winchester. 

They are so dog gone hard to find, and let alone as you stated, in nice condition with the Nickel intact. The "Half Nickle", is a little more desirable as a nice looking piece, with the blue barrel and magazine. It's a nice contrasting example.

The M-1906, was developed by Winchester to be a more affordable slide action rifle, than it's predecessor the M-1890. Changes in production allowed it to be sold for 2/3rds of the price of the M-1890. 

Tony

All too often, the half nickel Winchesters look like a late-stage exhibit in a Marine Corps STD training film. "This is your [1906 receiver in a glass jar] at twenty weeks."

I've always admired the restrained elegance of the half nickel guns. The full nickel treatment is too much; makes the gun look like a Kracker Jack prize.

My Model 62 is a reblue job, albeit pretty well done. Of course it has the hard rubber buttplate with some wear. I've given some consideration to finding a suitable flat steel buttplate and then having the receiver and buttplate electro-less nickeled. Pretty low on the "maybe list." 

You did very well with that piece and I'd display it prominently. Congratulations.

Mfg. in 1919 also, as the five, "Half Nickel" rifle's above, (OP), this one is, (third variation marked with the letter "B" under the serial number), also in pretty decent condition, (one of approximately 2600 mfg.), with some good honest marks on it, some light flaking, which was common, on the right side of the Nickel receiver. 

I do wonder how many have survived, since approximately 2600, "Half Nickel" rifles we're mfg. between 1919-1924, and approximately, 10,400 "Expert", (Fluted forearm grip handle), M-1906 rifles mfg. out of the total M-1906 rifles mfg. at over 720,000 rifles. Several "Expert", M-1906 rifles were shipped to Australia. 

Tony

No, it was not likely an SOE weapon.  It was more likely one of the Home Guard rifles like your 677 but in this case, when the war was over, it was "Sold out of Service" to the public.  That is the nose-to-nose broad arrows with "S" and "S" meaning of the butt stock stamp.  Many rifles owned and used at shooting clubs in the UK were threaded for suppressors simply to reduce the noise levels, it is a fairly common practice.  Most are threaded for the British standard 1/2"x 20 tpi suppressors.

Best Regards,

I have another M67 with a British inspection stamp and a Broad Arrow on the buttstock.

It has a shorter barrel and a thread for a silencer at the muzzle. Is it likely that it came from the British SOE?

Best regards,

Stefan

Mike

I can relate more easily to what a Nineteen Fifties Dollar would buy,  after some postwar inflation. Still, a quarter was not to be sneezed at - it would get you into a movie theater except for a Disney film. A Snickers bar was a nickel.

A matter of larger concern to a 12-year old was the price of Winchester .22 rifles. Few today cruising an old Gun Digest think a Winchester Model 63 was particularly expensive. I beg to differ. There was seemingly nobody on Earth who had that much disposable income.