<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: Winchester .22 Rim Fire</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>edensoasis on Model 1890 22 Long Barrel and Stock Length</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/model-1890-22-long-barrel-and-stock-length/#p177701</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/model-1890-22-long-barrel-and-stock-length/#p177701</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, may I ask the experts of their opinion on an 1890 Winchester 22 Long Serial #138 304. From what I have obtained with a letter from Cody Firearms Records it was manufactured in 1902. It is a blued 2nd edition model.  What is puzzling to me is the barrel length and the stocks length of pull. I am posting picks and measurements for all to see. It seems the barrel is 22 to 23 inches and the stock length of pull is about 12". There aren't any WP or W stamps on the barrel. There are what looks like seven punches stamped at the muzzle of crown of the barrel. The front sight is stamped marble 6. The barrel measurement from the the feeding tube to the muzzle is approx. 3.5" On the front face of the receiver are the stampings 14, 9, a six punched circle and a triangle with a one in it. The magazine tube is an after market addition. Any opinions will be grateful.</p>
<p>Pictures link.<br />
<a href="https://www.4shared.com/folder/oGLHzcwW/Winchester_1890_Pictures.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.4shared.com/folder/oGLHzcwW/Winchester_1890_Pictures.html</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 20:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>1873man on 1873 22 Cal</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177645</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177645</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>If you have it refinished by the run of the mill gunsmith then it will definitely  kill its value. Usually that involves wearing out 2 buffing wheels rounding all the corners and smearing the stampings and then having a black finish on it. To have it refinished properly it would be cost prohibitive. A professional refinish is a lot of hand work not power tools. A good gunsmith would use a thick liner so it can be welded in at both ends and rechambered. The welds can be hidden better. </p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 19:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>kem@meyersandshaulis.com on 1873 22 Cal</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177643</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177643</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I would put the gun at 40-50%.  Not much finish remaining but not pitted.  Some tool marks on the barrel near the receiver where someone wrenched on it.  Fires and ejects fine but does not feed properly.  I have not seen the gun in more than a year.  I talked to the gun smith working on it who said his notes said there were some case ruptures during test firing.  He said that was the basis for the recommendation to reline.  I never had that problem.  He said he would re-evaluate and get back to me.  If relining is necessary to make it shoot-able, then I would just as soon have it refinished as well so it is pretty too. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 19:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>1873man on 1873 22 Cal</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177608</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177608</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>What condition is the gun in now? If its been refinished then it wouldn't hurt. If it has a nice original look then don't. 22's are know for having poor bores because of the black powder shells and not having a small enough cleaning rod. Plus if a run of the mill gunsmith lines a barrel, its real obvious. A good gunsmith that works on old guns can do it with it being seen. </p>
<p>bob</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 23:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>TXGunNut on Smooth Bore model 67</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177607</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177607</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>jsgwoodsman said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>XLIV said<br />
I passed on one just like it recently that had wrong sights and custom stock. Got 20 miles down the road, turned around and it was gone.<br />
44<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>This happens to me anytime I walk away from a deal to "think about it". <br />
Sometimes it's for the best, sometimes not!<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sometimes you gotta listen to that little voice and walk away. OTOH if you pick it up off the rack or table more than twice it needs to go home with you. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 22:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on 1873 22 Cal</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177604</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177604</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>A lot!!!  IMO!!!</p>
<p>Instead of doing that, shoot it the way it is, if you must! They will still shoot decent enough, with a 5/10 bore. They're not known to be really all that reliable as a .22 caliber shooter, as a well known fact, is that the magazine issues with them can be many. The main reason Winchester came out with the M-1890, .22 Caliber pump rifle.</p>
<p>Less than 20,000 were mfg, in over the 720,000 M-1873 Rifles, carbines, and muskets. </p>
<p>More of a collector than a shooter. IMO!</p>
<p>As a collector of them, I would classify a person, as "Nuts", doing that! IMHO!</p>
<p>That's why the ones out there, fetch a pretty penny, because some out there have been owned by "Nuts"! LOL! <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Laugh" alt="Laugh" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" /><img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Laugh" alt="Laugh" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" /><img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Laugh" alt="Laugh" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Anthony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 20:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>kem@meyersandshaulis.com on 1873 22 Cal</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177600</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/1873-22-cal/#p177600</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I have a Model 1873 in .22 short that is currently being worked on for similar feed problems.  The gun smith has suggested relining the barrel.  While the bore is not great, I don't see it as ever being a tack driver.  How would re-lining the barrel effect the collect-ability of this gun?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 19:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on Smooth Bore model 67</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177576</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177576</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>jsgwoodsman said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>Anthony said<br />
Nice example Joel,<br />
As I just completed a 7 rifle, .22 caliber trade, for an unbelievable, high condition Custom Winchester Rifle, with a well known Collector/Dealer, and one of the prizes, was a "Smoothbore", M-67, with a Chrome bolt as yours is, and it was no less than 95-98%, according to his and my opinion. Looks like the twin to the one that you have in all reality, as the barrel blue was so good, you could still see the fine factory tooling lines in the original dark bluing, (like yours does), that we like to see. She was a safe queen and never saw the range, as thee bore was pretty darn shiny!<br />
Enjoy you're find, I haven't seen too many in my years of collecting, or even heard of them.<br />
 <br />
Tony<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks Tony,<br />
For clarification, did you trade away the above mentioned M-67 Smooth Bore, or take it in through the trade? If you ended up with it, I'd love to see photos - especially of the Smooth Bore stamp for comparison.<br />
In discussing this with a gentleman on rimfirecentral who collects 67s, he told me the following:<br />
"Model #G6720R. It was authorized in late 1936, but didn't appear in the catalogs until 1938. It was last cataloged in 1947. It has a 27" barrel and standard 67 sights (32B rear and 75C front). I've seen smoothbores with all three stock configurations that occurred during that time period (grooved forearm, blunt forearm, post-war tapered forearm). All of them had the 'Smooth Bore' marking on the left side of the barrel, just behind the rear sight."<br />
*It would be interesting to see catalogs for 1938-47 to confirm these eing offered. All I have is a 1938 Salesman catalogue and it doesn't mention the smooth bore... although it does mention being able to order model 71s in calibers other than 348 wcf!<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes,  I traded it away as part of a 7 rifle trade!  It was marked Identical to you're, and the exact same configuration, including the same sights.</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>jsgwoodsman on Smooth Bore model 67</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177571</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177571</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
<strong>Anthony said </strong><br />
Nice example Joel,<br />
As I just completed a 7 rifle, .22 caliber trade, for an unbelievable, high condition Custom Winchester Rifle, with a well known Collector/Dealer, and one of the prizes, was a "Smoothbore", M-67, with a Chrome bolt as yours is, and it was no less than 95-98%, according to his and my opinion. Looks like the twin to the one that you have in all reality, as the barrel blue was so good, you could still see the fine factory tooling lines in the original dark bluing, (like yours does), that we like to see. She was a safe queen and never saw the range, as thee bore was pretty darn shiny!<br />
Enjoy you're find, I haven't seen too many in my years of collecting, or even heard of them.<br />
 <br />
Tony<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks Tony,</p>
<p>For clarification, did you trade away the above mentioned M-67 Smooth Bore, or take it in through the trade? If you ended up with it, I'd love to see photos - especially of the Smooth Bore stamp for comparison.</p>
<p>In discussing this with a gentleman on rimfirecentral who collects 67s, he told me the following:</p>
<p>"Model #G6720R. It was authorized in late 1936, but didn't appear in the catalogs until 1938. It was last cataloged in 1947. It has a 27" barrel and standard 67 sights (32B rear and 75C front). I've seen smoothbores with all three stock configurations that occurred during that time period (grooved forearm, blunt forearm, post-war tapered forearm). All of them had the 'Smooth Bore' marking on the left side of the barrel, just behind the rear sight."</p>
<p>*It would be interesting to see catalogs for 1938-47 to confirm these being offered. All I have is a 1938 Salesman catalogue and it doesn't mention the smooth bore... although it does mention being able to order model 71s in calibers other than 348 wcf!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>jsgwoodsman on Smooth Bore model 67</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177570</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177570</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>XLIV said </strong><br />
I passed on one just like it recently that had wrong sights and custom stock. Got 20 miles down the road, turned around and it was gone.<br />
44<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>This happens to me anytime I walk away from a deal to "think about it". </p>
<p>Sometimes it's for the best, sometimes not!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 13:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on Smooth Bore model 67</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177523</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177523</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Nice example Joel,</p>
<p>As I just completed a 7 rifle, .22 caliber trade, for an unbelievable, high condition Custom Winchester Rifle, with a well known Collector/Dealer, and one of the prizes, was a "Smoothbore", M-67, with a Chrome bolt as yours is, and it was no less than 95-98%, according to his and my opinion. Looks like the twin to the one that you have in all reality, as the barrel blue was so good, you could still see the fine factory tooling lines in the original dark bluing, (like yours does), that we like to see. She was a safe queen and never saw the range, as thee bore was pretty darn shiny! <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Smile" alt="Smile" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" /></p>
<p>Enjoy you're find, I haven't seen too many in my years of collecting, or even heard of them.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 17:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Steven Gabrielli on Smooth Bore model 67</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177515</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177515</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Madis stated the ‘’target bore’’ was always designed in but was first cataloged in 1940 and the 24 inch barrel was standard at that time. For what is worth, IDK.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 15:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>cranky2 on Smooth Bore model 67</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177514</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177514</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>According to Herbert Houze on page 160 of his book. </p>
<p>The model 67 smooth bore was introduced in September of 1936 with standard rifle sights. With the Miniature target bore introduced on April 24th 1940. It had a 24 inch smooth bore skeet choke barrel with the same sight as the model 12.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 15:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jeremy P on Smooth Bore model 67</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177507</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177507</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>jsgwoodsman said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>Jeremy P said<br />
Are we sure of the factory smooth bore version? I can't remember any references to these...looks like a non standard font stamping but that pic doesn't load up to sufficient size for me...link me to a reference if there is one, would like to read about it!<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Jeremy,<br />
I don’t have a specific link readily available. I’ve read about these for decades. Back before they were “collectable”.<br />
Apparently the most common variation is the regular 27” 22 s,l,lr M67 barrel with rifle sights, reamed out to smooth bore by the factory, and the “smooth bore” stamp added just below/behind the rear barrel sight.<br />
Ive read that there are up to 4 variations of the “smooth bore” stamp, and have seen them in early finger grooved stocks. <br />
There’s also a “for shot only” variation w/ a 24” barrel that came with a single bead or double bead sight arrangement. <br />
This could be a “fake”. It wasn’t advertised or priced as anything special. The barrel finish appears 100% original to me. <br />
I can’t remember if there’s any reference to these in Houze’s single shot book, but think there was… <br />
Clear as mud - right!<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Interesting on the differing stampings, I will have to keep an eye out in the wild for these!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 01:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jeremy P on Smooth Bore model 67</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177506</link>
                    <category>Winchester .22 Rim Fire</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-22-rim-fire/smooth-bore-model-67/#p177506</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
<strong>Steven Gabrielli said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
Jeremy P said<br />
Are we sure of the factory smooth bore version? I can't remember any references to these...looks like a non standard font stamping but that pic doesn't load up to sufficient size for me...link me to a reference if there is one, would like to read about it!<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Madis discusses the smoothbore in the Winchester Handbook, states offered starting in 1936.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks I'll look there and the mentioned Houze single shot book....must've missed that on my previous read-through...but, I also have CRS...so....</p>
<p>EDIT: p. 151 of the Houze book, very quick mention.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 01:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
