<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: What's New!</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Rick C on Early 3 digit 1895 flat side acquisition </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180578</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180578</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tim appreciate your comments and you are correct about very few(only 287 from what I read but maybe Brad or Rob has the exact number) left the factory in 1895. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>kevindpm61 on Winchester letter question??</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-letter-question-1/#p180576</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-letter-question-1/#p180576</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Congrats! What do you intend to do with her? She would make a fine hunting rifle.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>helidriver72 on Winchester letter question??</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-letter-question-1/#p180574</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-letter-question-1/#p180574</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Heres the correct info, I’m pretty excited to see that the Lyman model 21 receiver sight letters. I suspected it would since it had the platinum dots on the yardage marks.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>WINCHESTER MODEL 1895 - SERIAL NUMBER 9304</p>
<p>Serial number applied on June 14, 1898</p>
<p>Type: Rifle</p>
<p>Caliber: 30</p>
<p>Sights: Lyman receiver and front</p>
<p>Received in warehouse on September 06, 1898</p>
<p>Shipped from warehouse on September 09, 1898, Order number 4873</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>tim tomlinson on Early 3 digit 1895 flat side acquisition </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180571</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180571</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The folks who can and do download, and then manipulate pictures will see a much better photo than I am able.  From what I see, I would be very happy to own the rifle!  Due to problems (slam firing amongst them, if I recall correctly) very, very few got out in 1895, so 1896 is the real start of serious production.  Right fine piece!  Bet Mark would be trying to own it as well!  Tim</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Rick C on Early 3 digit 1895 flat side acquisition </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180570</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180570</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kem And Tony. It might be a little bit overcast in the next few days here and my plan is to try and get some better photos. It really is 85% – 90% condition imo. Original varnish and sights with a nice shiny bore and strong rifling. I had to give up a really nice octagon 2nd variation 1890 and a few thousand cash but I couldn’t decline, especially an early three digit example. As you stated Tony, they’re hard to find and I wouldn’t probably have the opportunity again.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on Early 3 digit 1895 flat side acquisition </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180569</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180569</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>Congrats and thanks for sharing! </p>
<p>That's a very nice early Flat side M-1895 rifle. As you're well aware of, and as you know their hard to find with that much finish on the metal. It's hard to find a nice flat side in any caliber. </p>
<p>As far as the pics. go yeah I can understand the picture comments, but we've seen a lot worse. You can always throw more up on this thread at a later date when time allows and the weather is cooperative! You wouldn't hurt anyone's feelings. <img class="spSmiley" style="margin:0" title="Smile" alt="Smile" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" /></p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 16:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>kem@meyersandshaulis.com on Early 3 digit 1895 flat side acquisition </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180567</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180567</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Nice looking 1895!  Flatsides are my favorite.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on Early 3 digit 1895 flat side acquisition </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180552</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180552</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Yeah,  photographing high contrast objects - bright reflective steel combined with dark, relatively non-reflective wood -- is hard enough without dealing with strong directional light you can't control and a reflective background. </p>
<p>An old journalism professor, lecturing would-be photojournalists a long time ago,<img data-upload="1" data-width="5568" data-height="3712" title="DSC_0249.JPG" alt="DSC_0249.JPG" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/zebulon/2026/06/DSC_0249.JPG" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="5568" data-height="3712" title="DSC_0013-1.JPG" alt="DSC_0013-1.JPG" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/zebulon/2026/06/DSC_0013-1.JPG" /> said the most elaborate studio lighting setup-- soft boxes, hair lights, reflector sheets, backgrounds, you name it -- are essentially trying to emulate open shade in the morning or early evening. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 02:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Rick C on Early 3 digit 1895 flat side acquisition </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180551</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180551</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Zebulon said </strong><br />
Rick, <br />
Congratulations on a very nice acquisition. Handsomely kept and early in the life of the model. I have only seen a few flatsides. Inside gun photography is a real chore without a fair amount of equipment.  I struggle with it. When you get a nice but overcast day, could you take it outside and show us some more? <br />
A great catch.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks Bill and will do. It’s been pretty warm and sunny here the last few days and not a cloud in the sky. I just couldn’t get my phone to adjust to all the lighting outside that was showing so took them inside.  </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on Early 3 digit 1895 flat side acquisition </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180550</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180550</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Rick, </p>
<p>Congratulations on a very nice acquisition. Handsomely kept and early in the life of the model. I have only seen a few flatsides. Inside gun photography is a real chore without a fair amount of equipment.  I struggle with it. When you get a nice but overcast day, could you take it outside and show us some more? </p>
<p>A great catch.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Rick C on Early 3 digit 1895 flat side acquisition </title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180544</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/early-3-digit-1895-flat-side-acquisition/#p180544</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p class="spImageRemoved">Was lucky enough to become the new owner of this early Winchester model 1895 flat side in 38-72 cal serial #639 applied on June 22, 1896. This is the lowest ser # I’ve owned in a center fire model.</p>
<p class="spImageRemoved">The photos were taken inside so there’s some lighting issues going on but they’re not filtered. Bert feel free to turn them to the correct position if time permits. </p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="5712" data-height="4284" title="IMG_0829.jpeg" alt="IMG_0829.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0829.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="4284" data-height="3213" title="IMG_0831.jpeg" alt="IMG_0831.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0831.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="4284" data-height="3213" title="IMG_0832.jpeg" alt="IMG_0832.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0832.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="4284" data-height="3213" title="IMG_0834.jpeg" alt="IMG_0834.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0834.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="4284" data-height="3213" title="IMG_0833.jpeg" alt="IMG_0833.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0833.jpeg" /></p>
<p><img data-upload="1" data-width="4284" data-height="3213" title="IMG_0836.jpeg" alt="IMG_0836.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0836.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="4284" data-height="5712" title="IMG_0842.jpeg" alt="IMG_0842.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0842.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="4284" data-height="5712" title="IMG_0776.jpeg" alt="IMG_0776.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0776.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="1170" data-height="960" title="IMG_0843.jpeg" alt="IMG_0843.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0843.jpeg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="4284" data-height="5712" title="IMG_0840-1.jpeg" alt="IMG_0840-1.jpeg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/rickc/2026/06/IMG_0840-1.jpeg" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on Winchester letter question??</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-letter-question-1/#p180527</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-letter-question-1/#p180527</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Are you back from the frozen north?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 19:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on My 1886 in 45-90</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/my-1886-in-45-90/#p180526</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/my-1886-in-45-90/#p180526</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Well said. I do intend to try it with my Sharps and might do the same with an 1873 44WCF.  After that, I'll see how I feel about the 45-90. Beforehand, your 5744 will have to serve. </p>
<p>There is one other BP mini-project I'm going to try, replicating what Luke Short used over in Fort Worth (according to some, albeit questionable, accounts.) I have a decent 5" Colt Army Special in .41 Colt.  While not the alleged birdshead Lightning, its lockwork is far more reliable. I've got dies and a bag of Starline brass. What I lack are some hollow-based .388 slugs or some "footed" outside lubed bullets of original diameter, depending on how the barrel slugs out. I've located a source of cast bullets of both types.  At some point, Colt started using the same barrels for .38 WCF and .41 Colt. </p>
<p>Particularly in the case of the skirted slugs, BP would be authentic but also ideal to obturate the bore. And the report and sulfurous smoke would add verisimilitude. </p>
<p>If I can find a suitable torso image of City Marshall/Extortionist Courtwright to superimpose on a 25 yard target, I might allow you the honor of memorializing the end of Longhaired Jim's career. </p>
<p>Years ago, I picked up a blue and yellow box of Western 200 grain "inside jubricated" smokeless .41 Long cartridges. Likely from the Nineteen Sixties. Not being a cartridge collector and curious to shoot the Colt,  I fired a cylinder's worth at a 10 yard target. I recall the gun recoiled manageably but vigorously and the report was a heavy boom, not a bang. All six rounds stayed on the target, some in the black part, <img data-upload="1" data-width="4032" data-height="1816" title="20230630_182751.jpg" alt="20230630_182751.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/zebulon/2026/06/20230630_182751.jpg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="4032" data-height="1816" title="20230630_182825.jpg" alt="20230630_182825.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/zebulon/2026/06/20230630_182825.jpg" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="4032" data-height="1816" title="20230630_182742.jpg" alt="20230630_182742.jpg" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/zebulon/2026/06/20230630_182742.jpg" />and left holes not hard to see.  Across a bar room floor, it would have been all a skillful man needed to defend his honor and hand of cards. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 19:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jeremy P on Winchester letter question??</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-letter-question-1/#p180524</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-letter-question-1/#p180524</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I didn't see it in the GB photos, but now I'm curious...do you have a good photo of the serial number in question?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>TXGunNut on My 1886 in 45-90</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/my-1886-in-45-90/#p180520</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/my-1886-in-45-90/#p180520</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Zebulon said </strong><br />
Mike,  I have read the primer from cover to cover, several times.  What I do not see is any discussion about cleaning repeating rifles after shooting black powder cartridges. Venturino, in his book on shooting lever actions, describes his fondness for the Winchester 1873 clones and for shooting black powder in them in Cowboy Action competition.  What strikes me about that is the 1873 has removable sideplates. <br />
I'm sure the barrel of an 1886 can be saved from corrosion by promptly cleaning it, using the methods and agents you describe.  However, my experience with lever action guns is even smokeless powder residues eventually find their way into the lockwork. It is relatively simple to sluice it out with Ballistol and I need not be meticulous in getting out every last grain. <br />
On the other hand, I've seen enough pre-smokeless repeaters with corroded lockwork to wonder what one does to prevent it.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>My mistake, may have been something he wrote in another book or magazine article, possibly in person or all of the above. In any case it works and most shooters who use Holy Black regularly use the same methods I employ. I've been shooting (and cleaning!) BP firearms for over 30 years. I think Venturino was pretty firmly in the Windex camp, I learned about Moose Milk from members of the Cast Boolit forum. I certainly didn't figure it out on my own! Powder residue in the action is a concern but cleaning a lever gun upside down will greatly reduce the amount of residue in the action. Use any method you're comfortable with but if you won't let yourself experience BP shooting because you think it's too much trouble to clean it's your own fault, not Holy Black's. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
