steve004 said
Here's one with a sight often seen on a Winchester but almost never on a Savage:

View post on imgur.com

Very impressive!

Bert H. said

mrcvs said

Bert H. said

Bo Rich said
I prefer the Winchester!  Enough is enough on these second rate rifles!  🤪
  

I Concur!!
  

Okay, I won’t post these anymore.  My previous thread was such a hit I thought I might post this one since I really like the configuration and it really reminds me of a Model 1894 rifle.
In time, I’ll find another Winchester rifle to add to the forum.  I have one in the works now.
  

Ian,
I believe that Bo & I were both posting "tongue in cheek" to your recent post.  While the focus of this website and forums is "Winchester", the occasional divergence to the "lesser off brand" firearms is not strictly verboten, especially those that are chambered for a Winchester cartridge.
Bert
  

👍👍👍

I posted them, especially this one, as it so very much reminds me of its competition (e.g., a Winchester 1894) and I think that a Winchester lever rifle collector is likely to make room for one of these over other competing brands if they collect this pre WWI era stuff.

Mike

View post on imgur.com

Bert H. said

MidwestCrisis said

Bert H. said

mrcvs said

Bert H. said

Bo Rich said
I prefer the Winchester!  Enough is enough on these second rate rifles!  🤪
  

I Concur!!
  

Okay, I won’t post these anymore.  My previous thread was such a hit I thought I might post this one since I really like the configuration and it really reminds me of a Model 1894 rifle.
In time, I’ll find another Winchester rifle to add to the forum.  I have one in the works now.
  

Ian,
I believe that Bo & I were both posting "tongue in cheek" to your recent post.  While the focus of this website and forums is "Winchester", the occasional divergence to the "lesser off brand" firearms is not strictly verboten, especially those that are chambered for a Winchester cartridge.
Bert
  

What if I wanted to show off my marlin 36 in 35 Rem?
  

That would be a double foul and land you in the Penalty Box for the entire next month!
Bert
  

Noted….  Thanks Bert 

MidwestCrisis said

Bert H. said

mrcvs said

Bert H. said

Bo Rich said
I prefer the Winchester!  Enough is enough on these second rate rifles!  🤪
  

I Concur!!
  

Okay, I won’t post these anymore.  My previous thread was such a hit I thought I might post this one since I really like the configuration and it really reminds me of a Model 1894 rifle.
In time, I’ll find another Winchester rifle to add to the forum.  I have one in the works now.
  

Ian,
I believe that Bo & I were both posting "tongue in cheek" to your recent post.  While the focus of this website and forums is "Winchester", the occasional divergence to the "lesser off brand" firearms is not strictly verboten, especially those that are chambered for a Winchester cartridge.
Bert
  

What if I wanted to show off my marlin 36 in 35 Rem?
  

That would be a double foul and land you in the Penalty Box for the entire next month!

Bert

Bert H. said

mrcvs said

Bert H. said

Bo Rich said
I prefer the Winchester!  Enough is enough on these second rate rifles!  🤪
  

I Concur!!
  

Okay, I won’t post these anymore.  My previous thread was such a hit I thought I might post this one since I really like the configuration and it really reminds me of a Model 1894 rifle.
In time, I’ll find another Winchester rifle to add to the forum.  I have one in the works now.
  

Ian,
I believe that Bo & I were both posting "tongue in cheek" to your recent post.  While the focus of this website and forums is "Winchester", the occasional divergence to the "lesser off brand" firearms is not strictly verboten, especially those that are chambered for a Winchester cartridge.
Bert
  

What if I wanted to show off my marlin 36 in 35 Rem?

mrcvs said

Bert H. said

Bo Rich said
I prefer the Winchester!  Enough is enough on these second rate rifles!  🤪
  

I Concur!!
  

Okay, I won’t post these anymore.  My previous thread was such a hit I thought I might post this one since I really like the configuration and it really reminds me of a Model 1894 rifle.
In time, I’ll find another Winchester rifle to add to the forum.  I have one in the works now.
  

Ian,

I believe that Bo & I were both posting "tongue in cheek" to your recent post.  While the focus of this website and forums is "Winchester", the occasional divergence to the "lesser off brand" firearms is not strictly verboten, especially those that are chambered for a Winchester cartridge.

Bert

Bert H. said

Bo Rich said
I prefer the Winchester!  Enough is enough on these second rate rifles!  🤪
  

I Concur!!
  

Okay, I won’t post these anymore.  My previous thread was such a hit I thought I might post this one since I really like the configuration and it really reminds me of a Model 1894 rifle.

In time, I’ll find another Winchester rifle to add to the forum.  I have one in the works now.

Zebulon said
Well, you should get plenty of action. Sunflower seeds are crack cocaine for mourning doves. My problem used to be finding them in the 4-foot tall Sunflower patches without a dog. 
My pal TxGunNut will tell you to have the choke polished out to MOD.  I say save your pocket change until you can UPS the barrel down to Houston and let old Jess put in some internal threads for his Briley tubes. The single barrel fee isn't murderous and -- I promise you - actually increases resale value should you ever send the gun downstream. I've seen a high condition Skeet grade Model 42 with Briley tubes at auction and it looked a pool full of Piranah fish fighting over a live chicken. 
If you have an Auto-Five with an Invector or Invector Plus barrel and buy Browning packaged tubes for it,  they're made by Briley and so marked.  
  

My Auto 5 is old enough it doesn’t have removable chokes.  That’s something I’ll think about.  Maybe have both done.  I’ll say the model 11 is smoother than my 97. But that could just be my sample of 1 each.  

Bo Rich said
I prefer the Winchester!  Enough is enough on these second rate rifles!  🤪
  

I Concur!!