<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: What's New!</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Blue Ridge Parson on RIA 1892 Antique status</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183143</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183143</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago I purchased a Winchester 1894 takedown rifle that was considered an "antique" according to the Madis info, but in reality was made in 1900 (as confirmed by the info on this site.)  The seller, who was an FFL, was willing to ship it directly to me, and thought I was "just plain nuts" to insist it be shipped to my local FFL.  I would not knowingly give the BATF a reason to come knocking on my door.  So if I were the buyer on that RIA auction, I would again insist that the rifle go to my local FFL, in accordance with federal law.</p>
<p>BRP</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>steve004 on RIA 1892 Antique status</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183138</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183138</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I had observed RIA's boiler plate statement in several of their post M1898 pieces.  I have a bit of a different take.  I am still dumbfounded that they classify the guns as meeting, "antique status" (and presumably will ship them out directly as such), when they provide the clear evidence that the guns are not antique (the museum letter specifying they were made post 1898 and the WACA data).  It's like they are saying the Madis numbers are the final authority - the heck with actual reality.</p>
<p>Let me ask this - how comfortable would others here be (who don't a regular FFL or a C&#038;R), having one of these non-antiques shipped directly to your home?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on RIA 1892 Antique status</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183086</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183086</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
<strong>Bert H. said </strong><br />
Tony,<br />
I have observed a decent number of RIA's listing in the past year or so with the "Winchester Collectors Association indicates" statement, and I applaud them for doing so.  They also usually show a copy of the factory letter which is also greatly appreciated.<br />
Bert<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bert,</p>
<p>Once again I'm in agreement with you, and remember you saying this. I feel we're the Era that's kinda in a transitional information period, and it's almost our duty, to do much of what members like yourself has been doing, and educating the masses.  Showing the factory letters, for verified information is important.</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on RIA 1892 Antique status</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183082</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183082</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>I have observed a decent number of RIA's listing in the past year or so with the "<em>Winchester Collectors Association indicates</em>" statement, and I applaud them for doing so.  They also usually show a copy of the factory letter which is also greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony on RIA 1892 Antique status</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183080</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/ria-1892-antique-status/#p183080</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I chose to put this under, "What's New", vs anywhere else, because RIA, actually accredited the WACA, with the serial number timeline, vs. the Madis out of date information, in their description. This is not meant to be a knock on George in any way, but just an information update as time allows us.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/4098/3001/antique-winchester-model-1892-saddle-ring-carbine-in-4440-wcf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/4098/3001/antique-winchester-model-1892-saddle-ring-carbine-in-4440-wcf</a></p>
<p>In RIA's defense, I give them credit for bringing this to light.</p>
<p>Another way to look at this is to not even try to educate the past Madis quotes, and just list it as a year 1900 manufactured SRC!</p>
<p>Again, at least RIA, is listening to the many calls, from the members here, with the many hours of up dated information, from the timeless surveys and dedicated searches that are constantly being done.</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Buck94 on Simpson Ltd. New Winchester 86 Collection Arrivals</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/simpson-ltd-new-winchester-86-collection-arrivals/#p182720</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/simpson-ltd-new-winchester-86-collection-arrivals/#p182720</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Jeremy P said </strong><br />
Can you come back and let us know when they're live on the site?<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>He just posted a bad link. Unintentional I’m sure! I went to their website and am posting a direct link to their Winchester page. They do have about 15 pages of Winchesters for sale…</p>
<p><a href="https://www.simpsonltd.com/products/category/Long%20Guns/page/1?subcategory=Winchester" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.simpsonltd.com/products/category/Long%20Guns/page/1?subcategory=Winchester</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>epoletna on Simpson Ltd. New Winchester 86 Collection Arrivals</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/simpson-ltd-new-winchester-86-collection-arrivals/#p182713</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/simpson-ltd-new-winchester-86-collection-arrivals/#p182713</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Jeremy: I went to the link and it would not open.  The original post is a waste of our time.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 14:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jeremy P on Simpson Ltd. New Winchester 86 Collection Arrivals</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/simpson-ltd-new-winchester-86-collection-arrivals/#p182557</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/simpson-ltd-new-winchester-86-collection-arrivals/#p182557</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Can you come back and let us know when they're live on the site?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>robertsimpson on Simpson Ltd. New Winchester 86 Collection Arrivals</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/simpson-ltd-new-winchester-86-collection-arrivals/#p182556</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/simpson-ltd-new-winchester-86-collection-arrivals/#p182556</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hundreds of Collectible Winchesters on our website.  We just received a fresh collection of over 50 WIN 86's.  They will be on the website in the next few weeks.  Check out our "What's New" Section on our website for new arrivals:   <a href="http://www.simpsonltd.com " rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.simpsonltd.com </a>    Thank you!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>86Win on Winchester codes</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-codes/#p182428</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/winchester-codes/#p182428</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone explain these codes : E on tang end of 1892 25-20 Winchester stock and what code is on bottom of Lyman tang sight. I<img data-upload="1" data-width="640" data-height="480" title="P1050201.JPG" alt="P1050201.JPG" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/86win/2026/08/P1050201.JPG" /><img data-upload="1" data-width="640" data-height="480" title="P1050204.JPG" alt="P1050204.JPG" src="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/86win/2026/08/P1050204.JPG" /> can't understand it.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Zebulon on Oh I went and did it again!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/oh-i-went-and-did-it-again/page-2/#p182298</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/oh-i-went-and-did-it-again/page-2/#p182298</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>It would be extremely helpful if you could take some measurements and photographs. I'll try to find the Winchester production drawing of the more common 3278, so you can take comparable measurements.  </p>
<p>If you could, closeup photos of these views would be very useful:</p>
<p>A view of the side (an elevation view)</p>
<p>A view of the top (a plan, or dorsal, view)</p>
<p>A view of the inside (an antral view)</p>
<p>A view of the inside, from either end.)</p>
<p>What I would propose to do is to take your photos and measurements and annotate the photos with the measurements, using Photoshop. Then, post the annotated photos here with full credit to you. </p>
<p>If you would undertake the task, I'll PM you my personal email to receive the jpeg images. By all means, go ahead and post the measurements and your photos here directly, as well.</p>
<p>Thanks very much for your generous offer.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 20:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on New addition 49 model 94</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/new-addition-49-model-94/#p182297</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/new-addition-49-model-94/#p182297</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>TXGunNut said </strong></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>I like it, seems like flatbands are coming out of the woodwork this week.<br />
 <br />
Mike<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes they are... currently, I have <strong>2,726</strong> of them documented in the survey!</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>jsgwoodsman on Oh I went and did it again!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/oh-i-went-and-did-it-again/page-2/#p182296</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/oh-i-went-and-did-it-again/page-2/#p182296</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Zebulon said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>Jeremy P said </p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
oldcrankyyankee said<br />
I will ask this, please note the front sight hoods. They are not the same. Are they correct for the respective guns?<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bert beat me, but if you're interested in repops, this eBay seller has some good ones...here's the one you need: <a href="https://ebay.io/m/No0fTd" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://ebay.io/m/No0fTd</a><br />
Be warned though the listing is kind of broken, it won't combine shipping if you buy more than one. Just call their store in Ocala, FL and they'll ship for $7 no matter how many. I have the number if you need it.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>There were actually four (4) pre-64 Winchester factory sight hoods, designated, from low to high.<br />
#3276 for the Model 94 and others<br />
#3277 for the 24" Model 64 and a few others<br />
#3278 for the Model 70 except for some obsolete calibers,.and 71.<br />
#3279 for the Model 52 Sporting<br />
JWA has published a comprehensive chart showing measured dimensions of these except for the #3279, specimens of which nobody could find to measure. <br />
The #3276 and 3278 are by far the most common, although genuine WRA parts are expensive. <br />
Seewin has said the 3278 actually looks better on the 52 Sporting and that is what I have on my 52C Sporting. <br />
I would want to know whether the Ocala relicas are made of formed spring steel or if they were investment cast. My experience tells me investment cast pieces that thin are too fragile. <br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Zebulon,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have a high condition 52B Sporting, that wears what I assume is the original front sight hood. If it’s helpful to you or Jeff or anyone else, I’m happy to dig it out for confirmation of originality, and measurements. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 18:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>jsgwoodsman on Oh I went and did it again!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/oh-i-went-and-did-it-again/#p182295</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/oh-i-went-and-did-it-again/#p182295</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Handsome pair Tom,</p>
<p>That flavor isn’t what I actively seek either, but a deal is a deal… especially when it comes to Winchesters. </p>
<p>Congrats </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 17:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Jeremy P on Oh I went and did it again!</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/oh-i-went-and-did-it-again/#p182291</link>
                    <category>What's New!</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/whats-new/oh-i-went-and-did-it-again/#p182291</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Zebulon said </strong><br />
If you have bought one of these Ocala repros, stepped on it, and it did not crack, it has passed the Zebulon Test for Right of Continued Existence. <br />
When I can make it upstairs later today, I'll ask "Mother," my office computer, to find my copy of Jeff's chart. If it is in a format I can post here, I will do so. If not, I'll email.it you. <br />
I keep calling it Jeff's chart but I think it has a co-author. My memory fails me.</p>
<p>  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh I got you now, no, they're definitely formed sheet metal, doubt they're spring steel, definitely not cast parts.</p>
<p>Thanks for checking on the chart!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 14:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
