<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Winchester Collector - Forum: General Discussions &#038; Questions</title>
        <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Official Site of the Winchester Arms Collectors Association]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Springer2 on 1885 Low Wall in 25-21 Stevens</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184337</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184337</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for the information, Bert. That explains a lot. The breach of the barrel looks like new and just machined, not something done over 100 years ago. Also it locks up very tight but smooth--not like an old rifle. After I read your reply, I took a case I just primed and it fired fine and the primer was hit on center. Looks like whoever did the work knew what they were doing.</p>
<p><img src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/55531058283_449477e05f.jpg" width="375" alt="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/55531058283_449477e05f.jpg" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 23:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on 1885 Low Wall in 25-21 Stevens</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184336</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184336</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Per the original factory records, your low-wall S.S. was originally a 25 Stevens<strong> rim fire</strong>.  I can see in the pictures that you posted that it still has the original rim fire breech block versus a center fire block.  That leads me to question if will actually fire correctly.  Do you know if it has been test fired with a 25-21 Stevens center fire cartridge? </p>
<p>To covert from a rim fire cartridge to a center fire requires changing (or altering) the breech block and the firing pin, and changing the extractor.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>1873man on Winchester M-1866 and M-1873</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/page-2/#p184335</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/page-2/#p184335</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Bert H. said </strong><br />
Bob,<br />
Is this progressive change to the bolt associated with the addition of the "A" and "B" serial number suffix?<br />
Bert<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>The change happened before the A showed up.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Springer2 on 1885 Low Wall in 25-21 Stevens</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184334</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184334</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I shot these pretty quick so not the best photos. They would not come up in preview but maybe I did something wrong. </p>
<p><img alt="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/55529796527_f27d780a51_z.jpg" src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/55529796527_f27d780a51_z.jpg" width="640" /></p>
<p><img alt="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/55530969839_749291a5f4_c.jpg" src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/55530969839_749291a5f4_c.jpg" width="341" /></p>
<p><img alt="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/55529796522_e98679b1bc.jpg" src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/55529796522_e98679b1bc.jpg" width="500" /></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on 1885 Low Wall in 25-21 Stevens</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184332</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184332</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Springer2 said </strong><br />
Thank you all for the responses. I seen the rifle in a local ad along with some accessories and bought it. Using your serial number dater, it came up 1890. It just says 25-21 on the top of the barrel along with the Winchester markings further down barrel but no proof stamp. The bore looks very good, almost too good to be original. It looks like it shot some target as the front post sight is windage adjustable and the rear tang aperture is pretty small. Also this medium weight barrel was drilled and tapped for a target scope so I am guessing a target shooter had it. Looking forward to shooting it. <br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you can, send (or post) pictures of the caliber marking and the serial number. </p>
<p>Bert - <a href="mailto:Win1885@msn.com" target="_blank">Win1885@msn.com</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 21:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Springer2 on 1885 Low Wall in 25-21 Stevens</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184331</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184331</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all for the responses. I seen the rifle in a local ad along with some accessories and bought it. Using your serial number dater, it came up 1890. It just says 25-21 on the top of the barrel along with the Winchester markings further down barrel but no proof stamp. The bore looks very good, almost too good to be original. It looks like it shot some target as the front post sight is windage adjustable and the rear tang aperture is pretty small. Also this medium weight barrel was drilled and tapped for a target scope so I am guessing a target shooter had it. Looking forward to shooting it. </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 20:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Roger Adam on 1885 Low Wall in 25-21 Stevens</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184330</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184330</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>You can find 25-21 Stevens load information for smokeless powder at Loaddata.com</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 20:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on 1885 Low Wall in 25-21 Stevens</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184327</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184327</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Springer2 said </strong><br />
Was the 1885 ever offered in 25-21? Not much information on the round so I am also looking for any load information. Thanks<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes it was, but just (95) rifles (nearly all low-walls) were manufactured.  You can use the 25-20 S.S. load data.</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 20:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Springer2 on 1885 Low Wall in 25-21 Stevens</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184322</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/1885-low-wall-in-25-21-stevens/#p184322</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Was the 1885 ever offered in 25-21? Not much information on the round so I am also looking for any load information. Thanks</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony #5411 on Winchester M-1866 and M-1873</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/page-2/#p184321</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/page-2/#p184321</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>1873man said </strong><br />
I have narrowed it down to 28,000 to 31,000. The problem without looking at the guns themselves is most online photos don't show the bolt face when selling a gun.<br />
Bob<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bob,</p>
<p>That's pretty significant, in all reality. I agree, as it's pretty hard to determine from most of the pictures we see!</p>
<p><strong>Bert H. said </strong><br />
Bob,<br />
Is this progressive change to the bolt associated with the addition of the "A" and "B" serial number suffix?<br />
Bert</p>
<p>Bert,</p>
<p>From Gordon's book, that most of us refer to unless Bob has found out different through his works and surveys,  he states that around serial number, 79,000-182,000, we can see an, "A", follow, and around 179,000, and up, a "B", will follow.</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Bert H. on Winchester M-1866 and M-1873</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/page-2/#p184320</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/page-2/#p184320</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>Is this progressive change to the bolt associated with the addition of the "A" and "B" serial number suffix?</p>
<p>Bert</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>1873man on Winchester M-1866 and M-1873</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/#p184319</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/#p184319</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I have narrowed it down to 28,000 to 31,000. The problem without looking at the guns themselves is most online photos don't show the bolt face when selling a gun.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Anthony #5411 on Winchester M-1866 and M-1873</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/#p184318</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/winchester-m-1866-and-m-1873/#p184318</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Jeremy P said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
Anthony said </p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>
1873man said<br />
If I was going to make a tool, I would start with a pipe the right diameter and thickness and then mill or grind away whats not needed.<br />
Bob<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's another good suggestion, applying equal pressure on both notches. That reminds me of an older tool made similar for working on an appliance like a washing machine. In the automotive industry the Spindle Nut wrench set is just that. And the opposite end is usually made for a 1/2 inch extension to fit into a ratchet.<br />
 <br />
Tony<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>...and also the homemade tool to breakdown a model 1911 widowmaker shotgun! <br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Another good point Jeremy!</p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>1873man said </strong><br />
Tony you started a good thread here. We all are learning something new. I looked through my parts box and found another style of bushing so I started to look through my guns and I found that the first models have the scallops and not a slot. Where you would need a special tool to remove it. The one with the slot is second model.  I don't know if there is a exact serial number that they changed  but its between 27,000 and 40,000 from a quick look through my gun safe. Tonight I will have more time to look.<br />
Bob</p>
<p>  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bob,</p>
<p>The information on the serial number proximity, 27,000-40,000, on the second model is very helpful and informative for collectors, as I know it is for me.</p>
<p><a href="https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/1873man/2026/09/IMG_3574.JPEG" target="_blank">https://winchestercollector.org/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/1873man/2026/09/IMG_3574.JPEG</a></p>
<p>With the image that you provided, that really helps out a lot.</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Roger Adam on Do you have rifles or shotguns featured in The Winchester Book?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/do-you-have-rifles-or-shotguns-featured-in-the-winchester-book/#p184314</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/do-you-have-rifles-or-shotguns-featured-in-the-winchester-book/#p184314</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>Maverick said </strong></p>
<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p>Roger Adam said<br />
My "Winchester International Match Single-Shot Rifle of 1913" is pictured eight times in John Campbell's first volume book "The Winchester Single Shot", and once in his second volume book of the same name.<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I would have to dig out my Maids books to check. But I'm pretty sure if not the rifle, the drawings for that custom style rifle are shown in either the "Winchester Book" or the "Winchester Hand Book". I don't know which specific serial number is shown. But I'll have to dig my copy out and find it.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Maverick<br />
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for the response Maverick.  The International Match rifle that's pictured in the Madis book is serial number 102363.  It's also pictured in the James Grant book "More Single-Shot Rifles" published in 1959.  I was able to handle and inspect that rifle as part of the research that I did on my rifle.  It's currently in a private collection in Minnesota.  </p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 01:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Buck94 on Do you have rifles or shotguns featured in The Winchester Book?</title>
                    <link>https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/do-you-have-rifles-or-shotguns-featured-in-the-winchester-book/#p184299</link>
                    <category>General Discussions &#038; Questions</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://winchestercollector.org/forum/general-discussions-questions/do-you-have-rifles-or-shotguns-featured-in-the-winchester-book/#p184299</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I’ve got the #8 1894 that is mentioned in Winchester Model 94 the first 100 years! It is listed and discussed on pages 15 and 31. It was the 2nd oldest known surviving 1894 but is now the 3rd as the serial #5 turned up a couple years ago at Rock Island. I was gonna send it off and have it restored but Brother Bert convinced me that was a stupid idea 😀 </p>
<div class="flex flex-col md:gap-5">
<div class="px-5 py-8 md:px-10 lg:px-20 xl:px-[120px] min-w-full bg-surface-dark pb-10 pt-[41px] flex flex-col justify-stretch dark relative">
<div class="max-w-[1200px] m-auto flex-1 w-full flex flex-col justify-end">
<div class="flex-col z-10 hidden md:flex gap-5 text-text-contrast-light">
<div class="flex flex-col md:flex-row justify-between flex-wrap gap-6">
<div class="grow-1 shrink-1 basis-0 flex flex-col max-w-[994px]">
<div class="flex flex-col gap-6">
<div class="flex flex-row items-center gap-1">
<div class="grow flex flex-row justify-right gap-1 dark"> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="px-5 md:px-10 lg:px-20 xl:px-[120px] py-20">
<div class="max-w-[1200px] m-auto">
<div class="flex flex-col md:flex-row gap-5 lg:gap-10">
<div class="flex flex-1 flex-col gap-3  xl:h-full">
<div class="flex-1">
<div class="flex flex-1 detail-page-osd-wrapper gap-5 w-full h-[356px] xl:h-[400px] shadow-md">
<div class="bg-white light openseadragon-canvas-container">
<div>
<div class="openseadragon-container">
<div class="openseadragon-canvas" dir="ltr">
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 20:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
