Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester Express Sight
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 125
Member Since:
February 5, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 3, 2017 - 8:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Have a Model 1886, 45-70 with a Winchester express front sight.  It has a Gold bead. I think it is a “Semi-Jack” as it is round but I am not sure. See photos. The Winchester Book gives give the numbers 3,4,6,20,31,37 and 39 as designations but fails to tell you anything about the characteristic of the various designations ( ivory ,gold, large,small bead ETC). Not a big help. Confused

Has anyone broken the code on this? What is the likely designation of this sight?

Cheers

KirkIMG_1525.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_1528.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 3, 2017 - 8:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Are you looking in the Madis sight book?

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6387
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 3, 2017 - 9:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

37 (semi-jack) & 39 (jack) are Lyman numbers; don’t know how you could tell them apart without seeing them side by side.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 125
Member Since:
February 5, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 3, 2017 - 10:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bob- Not the sight book “The Winchester Book” , page 576.

Clarence- Are these numbers for the Gold bead sight?

Cheers

Kirk

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6387
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 4, 2017 - 12:01 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Kirk Fitzgerald said
Bob- Not the sight book “The Winchester Book” , page 576.

Clarence- Are these numbers for the Gold bead sight?

Cheers

Kirk  

Actually a little confusing because some but not all are illustrated in the Lyman catalogs I have. #20 is an ivory bead jack sight, #28, ivory semi-jack.  Beads unspecified on the 37 & 39.  Then there’s also a #24 jack, #32 semi-jack, beads unspecified.  Too much of a good thing, I’m beginning to think.

Diameter of the semi is 3/32″, jack 1/8″. 

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
March 4, 2017 - 1:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Clarence,

It looks like you have a Lyman sight. They made them with 1/8, 3/32, 5/64, 1/16 bead diameters in gold, silver, ivory and red. Per the sight book the #20 was called the Full Jack and says ” This was the usual sight for night hunting with a ‘Jack Light’ introduced in the mid 1880’s” I have a Lyman catalog and if yours is a 3/32 diameter bead then you have a #28. #3 is 1/16, #28 is 3/32 semi-jack and #20 is 1/8″ jack.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 125
Member Since:
February 5, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
March 5, 2017 - 12:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Guys, Think this is what I have so far a #20 and #28 are ivory beads #20 being a Jack and #28 being a Half Jack. The rest of the numbers have to do with the size of the bead and not the color.

Cheers

Kirk

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5055
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
March 5, 2017 - 3:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Brownells’ site has good illustrations of the current production Marble sights. Not sure how they compare with Winchester’s model designations.

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
March 5, 2017 - 5:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Kirk Fitzgerald said
Guys, Think this is what I have so far a #20 and #28 are ivory beads #20 being a Jack and #28 being a Half Jack. The rest of the numbers have to do with the size of the bead and not the color.

Cheers

Kirk  

Here is a couple clips from the Lyman catalog. From what I have found the #3 and #20 were patented on Oct. 6 1885, I would presume the #28 was the same date as well so these sights would have been available for the 86 from the beginning of production.

Bob

lyman2.jpgImage Enlargerlyman.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6387
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
March 5, 2017 - 6:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said 

From what I have found the #3 and #20 were patented on Oct. 6 1885, I would presume the #28 was the same date as well so these sights would have been available for the 86 from the beginning of production.

Bob
 
   

Bob,  That ’85 pat. originally covered only the #3 & #4 sights–it referred specifically to the method of fitting the ivory into the metal, as ivory had of course been used in sights long before.  The #20 came along some years later, but it would take a collection of early catalogs to pin down exactly its date of introduction; its listed in the undated, but c. 1900, Lyman catalog, but that’s the oldest one I have.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
March 5, 2017 - 7:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Clarence,

I got the patent date from  a Lyman catalog, it show the #4 as Aug 31 1886

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6387
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
March 5, 2017 - 9:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said
Clarence,

I got the patent date from  a Lyman catalog, it show the #4 as Aug 31 1886

Bob  

It would be odd that the #4 got ahead of the #3, except that numbers weren’t assigned until several years after production had begun.  Originally, #4 was called the “Patent Ivory Front Hunting Sight,” and #3 was “Patent Ivory Bead Front Sight.”  This info from the invaluable Lyman Centennial Journal.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
March 5, 2017 - 10:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

It would be odd that the #4 got ahead of the #3, except that numbers weren’t assigned until several years after production had begun.  Originally, #4 was called the “Patent Ivory Front Hunting Sight,” and #3 was “Patent Ivory Bead Front Sight.”  This info from the invaluable Lyman Centennial Journal.  

 #3 is ahead of #4 according to the patent dates in the catalog. Here is a copy of the sights from the Lyman catalog with the patent dates.

Bob

lyman3-1.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6387
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
March 5, 2017 - 11:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said

 #3 is ahead of #4 according to the patent dates in the catalog. Here is a copy of the sights from the Lyman catalog with the patent dates.

Bob
 
   

My mistake–was thinking they were both 1885.  (Will see my optometrist as soon as possible!)

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: [email protected]
Guest(s) 192
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6387
TXGunNut: 5055
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2348
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12784
Posts: 111359

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8871
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation