Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Proof marks on 1894 trapper
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1915
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 17, 2017 - 7:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

These proof marks look fishy to me–see photo #10.  Shouldn’t they match since they should have been applied at the same time?  The proof mark on the receiver looks completely wrong (missing the “P” completely, the “W” looks way off, and the overall stamp is the wrong size) and a gun with a 41805 serial number shouldn’t even have proof marks unless it was sent back to the factory for rework after 1905, right?  Every Winchester I have with proof marks match each other.  Also, in the same photo it looks like the original caliber marking on the top of the barrel behind the rear sight has been ground off with the caliber stamping moved to the side by bubba.  Maybe this one of those made-up trappers with a non-original barrel, etc???  I’m not interested in this rifle, but just looking to test my skills at identifying a fake.  What do the experts think?

http://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/rifles/winchester-rifles-model-1894-pre-64/antique-winchester-1894-trapper-with-15-quot-bbl.cfm?gun_id=100807106

Don

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 514
Member Since:
August 27, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 17, 2017 - 9:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The text in the last pic notes that the gun has an 1895 receiver fitted with a post 1906 barrel….

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1915
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 17, 2017 - 10:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Tedk said
The text in the last pic notes that the gun has an 1895 receiver fitted with a post 1906 barrel….  

Thanks Ted.  I missed that part of the listing.  It still looks to me that someone attempted to fake the proof mark on the receiver.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Bert H., rogertherelic, Edward Kitner, LeverGunner
Guest(s) 209
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6388
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4601
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2353
twobit: 2306
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12787
Posts: 111395

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8872
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation