Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Looking for correct sight and value of 1928 Mod. 94 .32 Special
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
January 30, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 30, 2015 - 8:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello there,

I have just picked up a 1928 button mag. in .32 but it’s missing it’s rear sight.  I would like to get the correct one for this rifle if possible.  I’m not currently able to upload pictures but anybody who is willing to help me value this thing would be appreciated.  I could PM or email photos to them.

Thanks,

Tom

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 31, 2015 - 1:55 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Tom,

You can send pictures to me at [email protected]

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1042
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 31, 2015 - 3:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Tom, if its a 32 Winchester Special, this is the type of sight it most likely originally had installed.  You can find them for sale from time to time on the internet or larger gun show.  The last one I tried to purchase was about $100.  Prices may vary though.

 

DSC_0151.JPGImage Enlarger

 DSC_0153.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 400
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 31, 2015 - 5:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Is the 32 WS a rifle or carbine?

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 1, 2015 - 6:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I think Bert is on the right track seeing some pictures and that will likely lead to the easiest answer.   

I talked to 1892takedown about this since he has been a regular contributor to my work on the 1894 sights.  I think the 32WS smokeless sight is not very common after the early 1900-10s.  It’s entirely out of the Winchester catalogs, based on the ones I have, sometime before 1916.  Winchester also made mention of that particular special sight in a standard paragraph about the 32WS cartridge in those early catalogs.  They dropped mention of the special sight in that paragraph after a few years.   Currently the latest 32WS sight I data collected on, that looks factory, is from 1910.  The gun in 1892takedown’s top picture above I have entered as 1905.  I’m not sure about the second one pictured.  My survey is no where near complete enough however.  The best I can do is combine the survey data with what I see in the catalogs, sight books, etc. and go from there.  I imagine there will be some found on later 32WS rifles but I do not think they will predominate.

One thing also to consider is that design was intended to accommodate both black powder and smokeless powder trajectories.  Was there much demand for a black powder sight for 32WS in 1928? 

I guess there is really no way to tell for sure without seeing the barrel wear on the particular rifle (if it is a rifle for sure).   There are pictures of the 22E Sporting rear sight with the set screw and 1927 pat. date stamp on at least one ’94 in the late 1920s in the 1894 sight project and I think I have other examples.  Some type of 22 series rear sight or a three leaf express sight would be more likely by 1928 in my opinion.  I’ve been shooting a rifle with the 32WS Smokeless sight lately and I do not feel it would lend itself well to use with a tang sight if desired.  However, a flat top rear,folding rear or express rear sight would be much less obstructive in the field of view if a tang sight was desired.
 
Brad

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 1, 2015 - 7:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Brad,

I just happen to have a relatively new survey in progress that has the serial numbers of (20) Model 1894s that were manufactured in the 1908 – 1924 timeframe that have the 32 Smokeless sight on them.

Serial No. Variation Frame Caliber Barrel Length Mag Lgth Proof UT Butt Plate PR DOM Stocks Other/Remarks
383091 Rifle   32 WS Oct 26″ F Yes 2 ? 1/17/1908   Smokeless sight
392964 Rifle   32 WS ½ Oct 26″ F Yes 2 Crescent 4/11/1908   Smokeless sight
400577 Rifle TD 32 WS ½ Oct     Yes 2 Crescent 6/5/1908   Smokeless sight
401239 Rifle   32 WS Oct 26″ F Yes 2 Crescent 6/12/1908   Smokeless sight
408497 Rifle   32 WS   26″ F Yes 2 Crescent 8/12/1908   Smokeless sight
422312 Rifle   32 WS ½ Oct 26″ F Yes 2 Crescent 10/28/1908   Smokeless sight
433113 Rifle TD 32 WS Oct 26″ ½ Yes 2 Crescent 3/3/1909   Smokeless sight
440176 Rifle   32 WS Oct 26″ F Yes 2 Crescent 9/16/1909   Smokeless sight
445557 Rifle   32 WS ½ Oct 24″ F Yes 2 Crescent 11/9/1909   Smokeless sight
450783 Rifle, Semi-Dlx TD 32 WS ½ Oct 26″ ½ Yes 3 Crescent 2/24/1910 PL PG I-CS Smokeless sight
450874 Rifle, Semi-Dlx TD 32 WS Oct 19″ F Yes ? Crescent 3/1/1910 PL PG Smokeless sight, Sling Eyes
455741 Rifle   32 WS Oct 26″ F Yes 3 Crescent 4/12/1910   Smokeless sight
509567 Rifle   32 WS Rnd 26″ F Yes 3 Crescent 8/7/1911   Smokeless sight
535802 Rifle   32 WS Oct 26″ F Yes 3 Crescent 1/9/1912   Smokeless sight
561730 Rifle   32 WS Rnd 26″ F Yes 3 Crescent 6/13/1912   Smokeless sight
587155 Rifle, Semi-Dlx   32 WS ½ Oct 26″ ½ Yes 3 Crescent 11/2/1912 PL PG Smokeless sight
612128 Rifle TD 32 WS Oct 26″ F Yes 3 SS SB 7/29/1913 Fluted Comb Smokeless sight
715334 Rifle TD 32 WS Oct 26″ F Yes 4 Crescent 12/18/1914   Smokeless sight
874965 Rifle   32 WS       Yes 4 Crescent 4/9/1918   Smokeless sight
970044 SRC, Trapper   32 WS Rnd 15″ F Yes 5 Carb 8/25/1924   Smokeless sight

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 1, 2015 - 10:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert

I notice all but one are pre-1920.  Any idea if the sights are original to the guns?  Would you have any pictures to email me of the trapper?

Thanks for posting that information.  It seems right in line with what I’ve seen so far.  You are just about going to have every surviving 1894 serial number recorded by the time you’re done with all of these surveys!

Brad

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
February 2, 2015 - 1:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Can I assume that the 32 spcl sight was an option… not offered as standard ?  How much extra?  I have this sight on a 1894 RBR that was re-barreled with a 1928 stamped underneath standard weight 32 spcl barrel . The sight  may have been put on when re-barreled ?  some time after 1928, as the original cal lettered is 38-55 dom 1902 . Replacement Barrel has both proofs No not collectable , but It was cheap exc bore, great shooter. Original finish Good on Frame and stocks

Phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 2, 2015 - 3:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Phil

I believe the 32WS Smokeless sight was standard in the beginning or advertised as such in 1902, 03 and 1905 at least:

“Rifles for the new 32 Winchester Special Cartridge are fitted with a new and specially designed rear sight…,which is graduated for either Smokeless or Black powder cartridges.”

I do not know yet how long it could be considered standard.  According to information the “The Sight Book” by George Madis it was replaced by sight 22A in 1915.  I still think the most accurate way to figure something like that out is to look at the literature and then look at as much data on actual guns as possible.  I think is more often found on 1900-10s guns as I mentioned earlier.

I would not know about your re-barreled rifle.  Wasn’t 1928 during the period of time when there were some parts cleanup(?) stuff and the 94/95 hybrids also?

Brad

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
February 3, 2015 - 4:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Brad,

I do not have pictures of the trapper, but when I looked at it, the sight appeared to be original to the gun. As for the others I have in the survey, I only included the data if I believed it to be factory original.

I also believe that the 32 WS Smokeless sight was phased out before 1924.  The Model 55 was introduced in June 1924, and I have not ever found one with that sight, and the Model 64 in 1933, again none with the Smokeless sight.

As for my research surveys, I am trying to find as many of the Model 1894s as possible.  I now have three separate surveys in progress, (1) First variations (serial numbers 1 – 8000), (2) All serial numbers 354000 – 999999, and (3) All serial numbers 1000000 – 2600011.  Thus far, I have recorded a total of 12,578 (which includes the Model 55 and Model 64).  I have programmed formulas into each survey that automatically extrapolate production statistics within each survey.

This is the extrapolation table for my survey of serial numbers 354000 – 999999;

Variations Qty % of Var. % of All Extrp Qty   Calibers Qty % Extrp Qty
Rifles           38-55 113 7.820% 50,518
Rifle 490 85.37% 33.91% 219,059   32-40 126 8.720% 56,329
Rifle, ELW 26 4.53% 1.80% 11,624   30 WCF 833 57.647% 372,401
Rifle, Fancy 23 4.01% 1.59% 10,282   25-35 WCF 126 8.720% 56,329
Rifle, Semi-Dlx 35 6.10% 2.42% 15,647   32 WS 237 16.401% 105,953
Sub Total 574 100.00% 39.72% 256,612   22 H.P. 2 0.0003% 2
            ?? 8    
Carbines           Total 1445 99.308%  
Eastern 37 4.25% 2.56% 16,541          
Eastern, Fancy 4 0.46% 0.28% 1,788   Take Down 155 10.727% 69,294
Eastern, Semi-Dlx 3 0.34% 0.21% 1,341          
Eastern, Trapper 1 0.11% 0.07% 447          
Musket 2 0.23% 0.14% 894          
SRC 622 71.41% 43.04% 278,071          
SRC, Semi-Dlx 7 0.80% 0.48% 3,129          
SRC, Trapper 195 22.39% 13.49% 87,177          
Sub Total 871 100.00% 60.28% 389,389          
                   
Total Surveyed 1445 % Surveyed 0.224%            

For those of you who read this, and are interested in participating in my surveys, please send me a PM or an email message.  I am also looking for volunteers to assist with surveying the guns out there in collections, auctions, and gun show tables.  If you are interested, please get in touch with me.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
January 30, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
February 11, 2015 - 5:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for all the help so far guys.  The Winchester is 38″ overall length with a 20bbl.  I’m thinking carbine right?  It’s not a saddle ring though.  It’s a 10″ button mag so what’s that, 3 rounds?

 

Thanks,

 

Tom.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
January 30, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
February 12, 2015 - 7:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks again for all the help Gents.  A 44A ladder sight it is.

Tom.

Avatar
Larry Reynolds
Guest
WACA Guest
13
February 15, 2015 - 6:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have a very nice 44A rear sight. Email me at [email protected]  Big Larry

Avatar
Frank Gieske
Guest
WACA Guest
14
October 21, 2017 - 10:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Brad,

I do not have pictures of the trapper, but when I looked at it, the sight appeared to be original to the gun. As for the others I have in the survey, I only included the data if I believed it to be factory original.

I also believe that the 32 WS Smokeless sight was phased out before 1924.  The Model 55 was introduced in June 1924, and I have not ever found one with that sight, and the Model 64 in 1933, again none with the Smokeless sight.

As for my research surveys, I am trying to find as many of the Model 1894s as possible.  I now have three separate surveys in progress, (1) First variations (serial numbers 1 – 8000), (2) All serial numbers 354000 – 999999, and (3) All serial numbers 1000000 – 2600011.  Thus far, I have recorded a total of 12,578 (which includes the Model 55 and Model 64).  I have programmed formulas into each survey that automatically extrapolate production statistics within each survey.

This is the extrapolation table for my survey of serial numbers 354000 – 999999;

Variations Qty % of Var. % of All Extrp Qty   Calibers Qty % Extrp Qty
Rifles           38-55 113 7.820% 50,518
Rifle 490 85.37% 33.91% 219,059   32-40 126 8.720% 56,329
Rifle, ELW 26 4.53% 1.80% 11,624   30 WCF 833 57.647% 372,401
Rifle, Fancy 23 4.01% 1.59% 10,282   25-35 WCF 126 8.720% 56,329
Rifle, Semi-Dlx 35 6.10% 2.42% 15,647   32 WS 237 16.401% 105,953
Sub Total 574 100.00% 39.72% 256,612   22 H.P. 2 0.0003% 2
            ?? 8    
Carbines           Total 1445 99.308%  
Eastern 37 4.25% 2.56% 16,541          
Eastern, Fancy 4 0.46% 0.28% 1,788   Take Down 155 10.727% 69,294
Eastern, Semi-Dlx 3 0.34% 0.21% 1,341          
Eastern, Trapper 1 0.11% 0.07% 447          
Musket 2 0.23% 0.14% 894          
SRC 622 71.41% 43.04% 278,071          
SRC, Semi-Dlx 7 0.80% 0.48% 3,129          
SRC, Trapper 195 22.39% 13.49% 87,177          
Sub Total 871 100.00% 60.28% 389,389          
                   
Total Surveyed 1445 % Surveyed 0.224%            

For those of you who read this, and are interested in participating in my surveys, please send me a PM or an email message.  I am also looking for volunteers to assist with surveying the guns out there in collections, auctions, and gun show tables.  If you are interested, please get in touch with me.

Bert  

Although not a collector, I have a takedown .32  #506408 With the WS sight.  My sight is not marked on the sidewalls of the base like the one in your photo but otherwise looks the same.  Only mark is on the target blade stating “Manufactured by the Winchester REP Arms Co, New Haven Conn USA   Pat. Oct8, 1901”.  It is missing a clip – spring – or something as I only have a base, a sight blade and a pin.  Is this a specially valuable sight, or should I feel free to replace it with a 22A or maybe a tang sight??

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
October 22, 2017 - 12:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Frank Gieske said

Although not a collector, I have a takedown .32  #506408 With the WS sight.  My sight is not marked on the sidewalls of the base like the one in your photo but otherwise looks the same.  Only mark is on the target blade stating “Manufactured by the Winchester REP Arms Co, New Haven Conn USA   Pat. Oct8, 1901”.  It is missing a clip – spring – or something as I only have a base, a sight blade and a pin.  Is this a specially valuable sight, or should I feel free to replace it with a 22A or maybe a tang sight??  

No, it is not a particularly valuable sight. Replacing it with any appropriate period correct sight is OK. 

For my research survey, does your take down have a round, or an octagon barrel? Magazine length? butt plate type?

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Frank Gieske
Guest
WACA Guest
16
October 22, 2017 - 2:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Magazine length is 25 inches as measured from muzzle tip (knob on the tube) to the takedown joint.  Octagon barrel and curved metal buttplate.  Thank you for info on that sight.  Do you know where I can get a diagram of it so I can find the missing piece?

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
October 22, 2017 - 4:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Frank,

I am unaware of any diagrams (parts list) for the old Winchester sights, or for that matter, a source of the parts.  Typically, your best option is to find a complete sight and use it as a pattern, or more simply, use it to replace the broken/incomplete sight.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
SO. Oregon
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 678
Member Since:
June 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
October 24, 2017 - 6:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Vince
Southern Oregon
NRA member
Fraternal Order of Eagles

 “There is but one answer to be made to the dynamite bomb and that can best be made by the Winchester rifle.”

Teddy Roosevelt 

4029-1.jpg

Avatar
New Mexico
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1167
Member Since:
December 1, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
October 24, 2017 - 3:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The “Smokeless” sight for the Winchester 32 Special comes up for sale from time to time on eBay.  The last one I saw, about a month ago, went for around $150 and was in so-so condition.  Good ones sell for around $10- $225 on eBay.  Occasionally there is a partial sight listed, but that is usually the base.

1876-4-1.jpg

"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." 

Avatar
Frank Gieske
Guest
WACA Guest
20
October 31, 2017 - 9:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Frank Gieske said
Magazine length is 25 inches as measured from muzzle tip (knob on the tube) to the takedown joint.  Octagon barrel and curved metal buttplate.  Thank you for info on that sight.  Do you know where I can get a diagram of it so I can find the missing piece?  

Well. it turns out I do indeed have all the parts – the forward end of the sight blade near the attaching pin IS the spring.  I had to bend the tip of the blade so the ball on that blade pressed on the barrel when inserted over the pin.  (Hope that makes sense!!)  Thank you for your help.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6387
TXGunNut: 5055
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2348
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12784
Posts: 111359

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8871
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation