Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1892 Research Survey
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2303
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
November 5, 2015 - 1:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Henry Mero said

  Hi Michael  Do You have any idea how many Mod. 92 15″ rifles were made. I just purchased ser# 102645. It is in pretty good shape, and all there and all correct, although a brown gun and I think I got it pretty reasonable. It letters as rifle, .38 cal, round bbl. 15″ plain trigger, numbered Dec. 7, 1898 shipped Jan. 9 1899. I just bought it for resale or trade on My favorite , 1894s. Any help would be appreciated.     Henry

Hello Henry,

I saw that rifle at a gun show show in Houston a few years back and have it in my survey.   I was not able at the time to get any photos of it and would appreciate any details that you can send my way.  [email protected]  

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1097
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
November 5, 2015 - 3:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi Micharl    I am at work and the gun is at home but i,ll get You some details to-nite. Do You have any idea how many of these 15″ rifles were built?   Henry

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1386
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
November 9, 2015 - 3:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

For your 1892 rifle survey. Saw this one on gunbroker.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=518890475

Al

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2303
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
24
November 9, 2015 - 4:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

tionesta1 said

For your 1892 rifle survey. Saw this one on gunbroker.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=518890475

Al

I saw that rifle Al.  It is interesting that the serialization date is in 1901 but the rifle was not assembled and in the warehouse until two years later!!  During the R&R in 1912 the barrel was replaced since it has proof stamps and the caliber stamp and barrel address are both located on the left side.  The barrel is definitely not original to the rifle.  And the sights have been replaced.  A great configuration but it looses points, and value, due the non-originality and condition of the receiver.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10845
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
November 26, 2015 - 10:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

For anyone researching the Model 1892 Trappers;

http://www.amoskeagauction.com/108/68.html

http://www.amoskeagauction.com/108/401.html

 

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
sgtsemo
Guest
WACA Guest
26
January 20, 2016 - 12:58 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Michael, one more 1892 followed me home.

WINCHESTER MODEL 1892 – SERIAL NUMBER 358729

Serial number applied on November 02, 1906

Type: Rifle

Caliber: 44

Barrel Type: Round

Trigger: Plain

Received in warehouse on December 07, 1906

Shipped from warehouse on December 10, 1906, Order number 77146

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2303
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
27
January 20, 2016 - 11:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

sgtsemo said

Michael, one more 1892 followed me home.

WINCHESTER MODEL 1892 – SERIAL NUMBER 358729

Serial number applied on November 02, 1906

Type: Rifle

Caliber: 44

Barrel Type: Round

Trigger: Plain

Received in warehouse on December 07, 1906

Shipped from warehouse on December 10, 1906, Order number 77146

Don’t you just hate that  when the rifle just won’t let you go???   I assume the magazine is full length?  Could you please send me a series of photos of the stamped writing on the gun?  [email protected]

 

Thanks so much

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
sgtsemo
Guest
WACA Guest
28
January 21, 2016 - 12:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

You got it.

Avatar
sgtsemo
Guest
WACA Guest
29
January 21, 2016 - 3:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

On the way

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30
February 6, 2016 - 11:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2303
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
31
February 6, 2016 - 11:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

hedley lamarr said

Did you get these already Michael?:

http://bhgappraisals.com/wp/?s=1892+winchester&post_type=product

Brad

WOW!!  No I do not!  But I will the first thing in the morning!   Thanks so much.  Yet another website to follow.  

Thanks Brad!  I really appreciate it.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
32
February 6, 2016 - 11:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

It looked like a lucky strike.  Google images works well sometimes.

Thanks for the 1895s.

Brad

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
33
February 7, 2016 - 12:48 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Pile of 1894s there too…

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10845
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
34
February 7, 2016 - 4:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Got them!

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
35
February 7, 2016 - 1:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
Bert
 
Were you keeping track of these too?  I noticed the date on the barrel.
http://bhgappraisals.com/wp/shop/1894-winchester-25-35-wcf-serial-373434-saddle-ring-carbine/
Kind of a neat gun, maybe somebody here took it home.

 

Brad

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10845
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
36
February 8, 2016 - 1:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Brad,

Yes, I am surveying all Model 1894 serial numbers > 353999. The patent date error on it is of special interest. Thus far I have surveyed (18) round barreled Model 1894s with it (no octagon barrels thus far).

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Bob Maerdian
Guest
WACA Guest
37
July 18, 2016 - 5:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

 1892 Wincvhester 25-20 WCF SRC (no ring), Carbine.  Serial # is 446438.  Missing magazine tube and forearm.  Will take photos later and will forward them to you.3

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2303
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
38
July 19, 2016 - 4:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bob Maerdian said
 1892 Wincvhester 25-20 WCF SRC (no ring), Carbine.  Serial # is 446438.  Missing magazine tube and forearm.  Will take photos later and will forward them to you.3  

Hello from Rome,

I ma visiting Rome for 10 days so my Winchester time will be at a premium I am afraid.  Thanks for the information on the rifle.  Based on the serial number the rifle was manufactured during 1908.  Is there a dovetail cut into the bottom of the barrel near the front sight?  That would indicate the rifle originally had a full length magazine.  I will look forward to receiving the photos.

Ciao

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
August 7, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
39
August 7, 2016 - 8:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello,

I am new to this forum, I just discovered it existed a few minutes ago. 

A couple of years ago, I bought a 92 saddle ring carbine in 44 WCF that was produced in late 1905.  Serial # 31xxxx, which shipped from Winchester in December of 1905 according to the Cody factory letter.  There are two order numbers associated with this carbine, #37508 on December 19, 1905—on which it shipped from the factory—and order #40036 on December 28, 1905.  No information was found for the latter order number. 

My 92 has a couple of odd features that I am attempting to research.  First, it has a bayonet lug on the right side of the barrel (approximately the 3 o’clock position).  The top section of the end of the magazine tube (and cap) are relieved to allow the collar of the bayonet to fit between the muzzle and the magazine.  Second, it has furniture for attaching a sling to the stock and on the barrel forward of the forend—it’s dovetailed into the underside of the barrel.  My 92 has the standard factory proof markings on the barrel and receiver.  There is one additional marking—a circle A—that is stamped into the area below the 44 WCF marking, close to corner where the forend meets the receiver.  There are no markings on the tangs or frame under the stock. (I have not been able to find information on the circle A mark on the barrel.)

I am on the hunt for a bayonet that fits my 92, but when I discovered this forum and your research project I thought you might like to know about my 92.  One local collector speculated that my 92 was sent to Mexico or one of the South American countries where it was modified and used as a police carbine.  Another expert seemed to agree and put me on the trail for a Remington bayonet that was part of a Mexican contract in the late 1890s/early 1900s. 

Yet another expert seems very certain that the bayonet lug modification is a Winchester factory modification; it’s very well done and appears to have been made at the time of production.  The mysterious second order number (see above) might shed some light on this, but no other information is available for that order. 

I you like, I can send you some pictures of my 92 and its special features. 

Have you seen other 92 SRCs like mine?  Do you have any information that might help me find the bayonet that fits it?

I appreciate any information you are able to share with me.

 

Regards,

Keith Pardoe

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2303
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
40
August 8, 2016 - 10:42 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Good morning and welcome to the the forum Keith,

Photos will be a great place to start in assessing your rifle.  Please send them to my email at [email protected]  When you got your factory letter did you also request an image of the ledger entry for your specific serial number?

Michael

   

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: 426crown, antler1, keith shaffer, TXGunNut, 86Win, Green River Gus
Guest(s) 171
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6380
TXGunNut: 5050
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4260
Big Larry: 2346
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12773
Posts: 111285

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1767
Members: 8860
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation